https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468861
--- Comment #4 from Felix Yan ---
I should have addressed these problems.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felixonmars/fedora-staging/115ecf207f86073dc0177f316b08d387eae25a57/dtksettings/dtksettings.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fedrepo-req
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
--- Comment #2 from mpr...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/fedrepo-req.spec
SRPM URL: http://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/fedrepo-req-0.1.7-1.fc25.src.rpm
Thanks for the review! I think this latest version addresses your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
Bug ID: 1469331
Summary: Review Request: fedrepo-req - A CLI tool that provides
an easy way to submit ticket requests for packaging
tasks in Fedora
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463797
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463797
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-irc-colors-1.3.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ff0e626a10
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468766
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463797
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-irc-colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463821
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-simple-markdown-0.2.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e72aded7ea
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426962
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-net-browserify-alt-1.1.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3c658315da
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468949
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #2)
> Taking review.
Thanks!
>
> One quick comment for now:
>
> Please make use of the python3_pkgversion macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431855
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-debrepo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463797
Michael Cronenworth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189171
--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Sorry, I don't know how I missed your comment.
Spec URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/antlr-python/antlr-python.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431855
--- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer ---
Awesome, thanks Julien!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468949
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468766
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322
--- Comment #11 from Josh Boyer ---
I've added the bundled Provides. For the bundled versions with explicit tags
or commits, I've included those. For those where I can't tell which upstream
is explicitly vendored, I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love ---
Of course you can use the changes. I don't think it's necessary to attribute
changes from a review, and they're not copyright-significant.
Have you seen the discussion on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468766
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth ---
They bundle 0.7.0 and Fedora carries a git checkout (0.8.0+). I'm waiting on my
Z-wave stick to arrive so I can't test it at the moment. I'll mark it as
bundled for now.
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451348
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/neard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rpkg-client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465676
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mingw-graphite2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #6 from Qixiang Wan ---
Beside of that, I found python2-koji is not available for Fedora 25 from
updates repo yet, so it can cause problem to have python2-koji before it's
available in updates.
python2-koji can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
--- Comment #2 from Qixiang Wan ---
I had another check on the packages list, some of the python-* packages are
named as python2-* from Fedora 26, since Fedora 26 is not GA yet, I think we
can keep it as now and update if we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451348
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #5 from Qixiang Wan ---
(In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #4)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #2)
> > > Hi Igor,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492
--- Comment #11 from s1061...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #10)
> No sure about (In reply to s1061123 from comment #9)
> > Hi srakitnican,
> >
> > Thank you for your review again!
> >
> > Here is the modified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
Qixiang Wan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #11 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Bit weird that it's version 5.0.0, but 6.2.1 of gcc (and presumably some other
version of the other tools). Not sure what should be done about that.
Minor things
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #4 from Qixiang Wan ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> (In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #2)
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments, the remaining python-* packages are all available
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422198
Tomas Tomecek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(james.hogarth@gma |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #2)
> Hi Igor,
>
> Thanks for your comments, the remaining python-* packages are all available
> in python-* prefix only which I checked in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #2 from Qixiang Wan ---
Hi Igor,
Thanks for your comments, the remaining python-* packages are all available in
python-* prefix only which I checked in fedora koji build system.
python2-koji is available from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
Bug ID: 1469009
Summary: Review Request: odcs - On Demand Compose Service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492
--- Comment #10 from srakitnican ---
No sure about (In reply to s1061123 from comment #9)
> Hi srakitnican,
>
> Thank you for your review again!
>
> Here is the modified spec/SRPM, all comments above are taken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451348
--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #1)
> I have found one thing might need a comment or changed. Others looks good.
>
> [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Also depends on a new Rtree, but I'm hoping that can be updated by the time the
other requirements are reviewed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468877
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468872
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468995
Bug ID: 1468995
Summary: Review Request: python-geopandas - Geographic pandas
extensions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468873
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Some informal reviews I have done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468877
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Some informal reviews I have done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468872
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Some informal reviews I have done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971#c1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336168
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467371
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467527
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
Qixiang Wan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: freshmaker |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
Bug ID: 1468971
Summary: Review Request: freshmaker -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee:
56 matches
Mail list logo