https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-aiosmtpd-1.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19db6a5d92
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #3 from Yunying Sun ---
Thanks Robert-Andre for the first review.
With current upstream code base, tpm2-abrmd.service is installed at
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/tpm2-abrmd.service, not /lib/systemd/system.
I created a ticket for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(hho...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Tracking
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #4 from Yunying Sun ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> Hello,
>
> A couple of points first:
>
> - Systemd service files should be installed in %{_unitdir}. See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yes, in %install just move from the file from
%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/systemd/system/tpm2-abrmd.service to
%{buildroot}/%{_unitdir}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
--- Comment #6 from Alfredo Moralejo ---
official package review:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
Alfredo Moralejo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|needinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #6 from Yunying Sun ---
Thanks Robert. I've updated SPEC & SRPMS to address the issues in comment 2:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-abrmd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Thanks for the comments and sorry for the late reply, I was trying to get the
tests working with upstream - still having some issues.
Uhm why obsoletes qt-creator? Qbs is currently a subpackage of qt-creato
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473663
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457737
Bug 1457737 depends on bug 1457735, which changed state.
Bug 1457735 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-iniparse - Ruby library for
parsing INI documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457735
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457735
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
--- Comment #17 from Dominic Hopf ---
Somehow the dependency management is a bit confusing to me today. Until today I
was assuming that everything I BuildRequire is a Require afterwards anyway.
The perl(Net::SSH2) requirement actually is ther
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/icemon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419317
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-terminal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419332
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-shortcut-viewer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421041
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-gettext-tools
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Regexp-Stringify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773
Bug ID: 1476773
Summary: Review Request: python-subunit2sql - Command to Read a
subunit file or stream and put the data in a SQL DB
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473663
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
icemon-3.1.0-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6952a04673
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Robin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini ---
The previously missing dependencies have now been pushed to the rawhide
repositories and to the mirrors (which took some time due to the mass rebuild).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474333
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
Bug ID: 1476790
Summary: Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner
similar to testrepository
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476325
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chku...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #5 from Zamir SUN ---
Updated.
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
> danmaQ-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474333
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489
--- Comment #2 from Zamir SUN ---
Hi, thanks for the review.
> - If you're installing a .desktop file, you must validate it in %check:
IMO this is not a general desktop file. It is for xfce use only. I checked
various xfce plugins, and none
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Blocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine.
Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>What's more, it will fail to rpmbuild if a validate is added
Why would that be?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474392
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474392
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678
Bug 1470678 depends on bug 1470656, which changed state.
Bug 1470656 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp
object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #7 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine.
>
> Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check.
Done.
Spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489
--- Comment #4 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> >What's more, it will fail to rpmbuild if a validate is added
>
> Why would that be?
It shows
> + desktop-file-validate
> /home/zsun/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-stestr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani ---
The qbs subpackage is only f27+ with qt-creator-4.3.x, see [1]. This actually
makes it tricky now that I think of it though, since Obsoleting qbs will work
fine for current rawhide users, but users updating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
OK, I wasn't aware of the subpackage in rawhide. But this doesn't really change
anything: dnf doesn't care from what srpm a binary subpackage originates. So
when you just move the subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434749
Lukas Berk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429804
Lukas Berk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani ---
Okay, thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434744
Lukas Berk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756780
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476458
--- Comment #6 from Otavio R. Piske ---
> Sorry for not pointing this out earlier, but I just consulted the Licensing
> Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names
Thanks for pointing th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the review! I'll have a look at hugo.
> Is there any reason for the second license file not being under %license?
Yes. Writing "%license LICENSE" and "%license foo/bar/LICENSE" will resu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #13 from Athos Ribeiro ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #12)
> Thank you for the review! I'll have a look at hugo.
>
> > Is there any reason for the second license file not being under %license?
>
> Yes. Writing "%li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #25 from Fabio Valentini ---
I have found some issues:
1) The latest release is 0.25.1. Please update your package (v0.24) for the
latest version.
2) The "-unit-test-devel" subpackage Requires "%{name}-devel" (which doesn't
exist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini ---
Well, in this case, I explicitly copied the file to a *different* filename
myself, because both files are named "LICENSE" in the tarball, which would
generate a conflict.
Using something like
%license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-cznic-ql
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476438
--- Comment #4 from Jake Hunsaker ---
I forgot to mention in c0, I will need a sponsor as this is my first package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani ---
Uhm,
Problem 1: both package qbs-1:1.9.0-0.1.gita2fd0f3.fc27.x86_64 and
qt-creator-4.4.0-0.1.beta1.fc27.x86_64 obsolete qt-creator < 4.4.0
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
qbs-4.3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
What was the command that gave this error?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani ---
Just a plain
# dnf update
By the way, since there is a DSO dependency
/usr/lib64/qtcreator/plugins/libQbsProjectManager.so -> libqbscore.so.1.8
it is already taken care of that updating qt-creator will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
icemon-3.1.0-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434
--- Comment #4 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
Sorry for changing URLs again
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585332-bstrlib/bstrlib.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #7 from Yunying Sun ---
%changelog
* Tue Aug 1 2017 Sun Yunying - 1.1.0-3
- Use config option with-systemdsystemunitdir to set systemd unit file location
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-abrm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #8 from Yunying Sun ---
SRPM URL should be:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-abrmd-1.1.0-3.el7.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #34 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #30)
> And now the build fails on ppc64le, while successful on all other arches:
>
> bin/ib_acme: error while loading shared libraries:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/rdma-c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-stestr-0.5.0-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0c9fb7977a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434
--- Comment #5 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> ---
(In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0)
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585360-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr
80 matches
Mail list logo
