https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457737
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475961
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Thank you for your review and helpful comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
Bug 1465889 depends on bug 1478689, which changed state.
Bug 1478689 Summary: Review Request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on QtAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478689
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478689
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
There's nothing after your %systemd_postun, didn't you forget to add the
service file there?
%systemd_postun tpm2-abrmd.service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
Right. We still need gtef though to get latexila updated in F26.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
--- Comment #26 from Eyal Edri ---
Any update on accepting the gdeploy package? any more actions are required?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478656
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Bug ID: 1478703
Summary: Review Request: perl-Exporter-Easy - Takes the
drudgery out of Exporting symbols
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1472755
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1478705
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
Bug ID: 1478705
Summary: Review Request: deepin-calendar - Calendar for Deepin
Desktop Environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478705
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felixonm...@archlinux.org,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421048
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421046
--- Comment #3 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00587260-golang-deepin-go-lib/deepin-go-lib.spec
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476558
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434578
--- Comment #3 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
LaTeXila has switched from Gtef to Tepl in Release 3.25.1
https://git.gnome.org/browse/latexila/tree/NEWS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421046
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sensor@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #18 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to sensor.wen from comment #17)
> - "_" prefix in macro names is not necessary.
>
> %{_commit} -> %{commit}
Oh, thanks. Will change it when packaging into repo
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #19 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #16)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> > ... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then just go ahead — the
> > guidelines (the old and t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: danmaQ - A |Review Request: danmaq - A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|danmaQ |danmaq
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #20 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #19)
> (In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> > > ... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then ju
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #21 from Zamir SUN ---
SPEC URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaq/danmaq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaq/danmaq-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478689
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478689
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Hmm, Robin, can you provide some details why this is closed?
Oh, this package requires qtav and in turn FFmpeg. The latter is not permitted
by Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476584
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476584
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476584
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also, you could use pkgconfig to handle your -devel dependencies.
If you don't know what's the pkgconfig name for a -devel, just search for it
with dnf. For example:
>$dnf repoquery -l deepin-too
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476458
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(athoscribeiro@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476558
--- Comment #2 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/05164f3d4a5344d2c6099e0675a92ec205f9d434/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-desktop-base.spec
Hello,
Thank you for your help. I fixed some problem.
- ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422123
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476558
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
You should post both the updated SPEC and the updated SRPM.
One last thing, you shouldn't own "/usr/share/distro-info" because it is owned
by other package (distro-info).
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476584
--- Comment #5 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/0ee362e6a7f81ba7df3ddda0472465154d651e6e/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-session-ui.spec
Diff:
https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/0ee362e6a7f81ba7df3dd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421048
--- Comment #2 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/aae8453fbda7ce83d72d3c385a4122909f7d759e/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-sound-theme.spec
I fixed release tag and description. Thanks.
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476560
--- Comment #3 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/5e57f37830e634919c2c440cf8a5fb2311ca2e7e/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-desktop-schemas.spec
Fixed :)
I will be submit deepin-artwork-themes package fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444666
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-XStatic-Patternfly-3.21.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444682
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-XStatic-DataTables-1.10.15.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447120
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyfakefs-3.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421058
--- Comment #5 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/afcfb988017bd8354ec4f60e63c5d692da957cf4/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-metacity.spec
Fixed all. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462443
--- Comment #14 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #12)
> Created attachment 1292418 [details]
> hdf5: enable szip support through libaec
>
> With this patch we can now enable szip support in hdf5:
> http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.8-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421058
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oops, sorry. My comment about glib-compile-schemas was wrong. I trusted
fedora-review without checking the guidelines, but
/usr/bin/glib-compile-schemas should not be called since F24 (#14093
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476560
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oops, sorry. My comment about glib-compile-schemas was wrong. I trusted
fedora-review without checking the guidelines, but
/usr/bin/glib-compile-schemas should not be called since F24 (#14093
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444682
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-XStatic-DataTables-1.10.15.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438881
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
guile22-2.2.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193
Bug 1426193 depends on bug 1447089, which changed state.
Bug 1447089 Summary: Review Request:
python-XStatic-Patternfly-Bootstrap-Treeview - Patternfly Bootstrap Treeview
CSS/JS framework (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447089
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
--- Comment #2 from Roman Joost ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Roma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469331
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #38 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467651
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #39 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Maslennikov ---
Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/708923dcd5342351cda488fa51cf296091abfac1/ucx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5ef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr
63 matches
Mail list logo