https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243
--- Comment #7 from RudraB ---
OK, but since the maintainer is not responding to the bug, what is the best bet
now? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243#c1 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794793
--- Comment #11 from IBM Bug Proxy ---
--- Comment From m...@de.ibm.com 2017-12-11 06:03 EDT---
There is a new version of OpenSSL-ibmpkcs11 available upstream
You can easily grab this release in tarball format on Github:
https://github
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509290
--- Comment #14 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
I added a github issue to the original branch,
https://github.com/Sharecare/libvmod-uuid/issues/8 , and have asked my upstream
at https://github.com/otto-de/libvmod-uuid to look into it.
By the way, th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
Daniel Laskowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dannie...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518262
--- Comment #6 from Zuzana Svetlikova ---
That would be the case if I were building yarn from GH sources. In this case I
just install the (already built) tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524504
Bug ID: 1524504
Summary: Review Request: python-gattlib - Library to access
Bluetooth LE devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524504
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1523930
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler ---
The main reason is that it is written in FPC/Lazarus, which is not a mainstream
programming language, and which is fairly poorly maintained upstream. There are
bindings (and corresponding backends for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508950
--- Comment #4 from Jos de Kloe ---
just for information. Upstream issues:
https://software.ecmwf.int/issues/browse/SUP-2271
https://software.ecmwf.int/issues/browse/SUP-2272
have now been made publicly accessible.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911
--- Comment #31 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Daniel Laskowski from comment #29)
> Double Commander is still in development - new version 0.8.0 arrived:)
> https://sourceforge.net/p/doublecmd/news/2017/12/double-commander-080-beta-
> relea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517006
Christoph Junghans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524551
Bug ID: 1524551
Summary: Review Request: libsodium23 - The Sodium crypto
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #3)
> also as rubygem(gem_isolator)(I'll try
> to send soon on review request).
I would not mind if you disabled the specific test case ATM:
~~~
# Requires rubygem(ge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #5)
LGTM. Could you please ask for repository, import and build the package, since
it was already approved by Roman previously?
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #10)
> Hi Vit,
> yes bacon not needed.
Thx.
But since rubygem-ast does not need this package for its build, do you still
want to import it into Fedora? If the answer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519323
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Add a comment explaining what the patch is for
- You never apply the patch in %prep, did you forget that part?
%patch0 -p1
- Escape the macros in your last changelog entry by doubling the %
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519747
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Why do you use a patch instead of using iconv in %prep?
%prep
%setup -q
iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.new && \
touch -r AUTHORS AUTHORS.new && \
mv AUTHORS.new AUTHORS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509290
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Patch should be numbered:
Patch0: vmod-uuid-1.3.fix_obsolete_m4_macro.patch
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519747
--- Comment #10 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #9)
> - Why do you use a patch instead of using iconv in %prep?
Because I experienced technical problems, but I will try your solution
> libdigidocpp-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523909
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jcl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517006
--- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Lovely! Thanks for the review! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rmtest-0.6.6-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8e24053bdc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rmtest-0.6.6-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4ba4b53084
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517993
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rmtest-0.6.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3742361d6b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517006
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vimiv
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524504
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524245
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524206
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1524504
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Corrected:
SRPMS:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-gattlib/python-gattlib-0.20150805-1.fc27.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-gattlib/python-gattlib.spec
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014544
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
31 matches
Mail list logo
