https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630
--- Comment #61 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #51)
> - Use pkgconfig to get include/libs instead of hardcoding (rhbz#1534595)
we can't use pkgconf, for example:
pkgconf --cflags libxml-2.0
-I/usr/i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
marcindulak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcin.du...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ma...@mavit.org.u |
|k)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
> >- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
> > Note: molsketch-debugsource :
> > /usr/src/debug/molsketch-0.5.1-2.fc28.x86_64/libmolsketch/Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852
--- Comment #22 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
Also, I installed molsketch and all its subpackages in mock (built using the
same spec file as in koji build 24441314) and there were no errors:
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install
/var/lib/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274
--- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa ---
@Peter, I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the
original post, so that fedora-review can process it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #12 from Wade Berrier ---
Upstream notified about the incorrect addresses in the license files:
https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/527
Git repo requests:
f27:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
Björn Persson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
--- Comment #10 from marcindulak ---
(In reply to Björn Persson from comment #9)
> (In reply to marcindulak from comment #8)
> > mv %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name} %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}
>
> Where those aren't equal, the correct solution is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #13 from Wade Berrier ---
I guess I need a sponsor?
My pagure.io requests were closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495293
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495293
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-Naked-0.1.31-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-472ea01f77
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526717
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-giacpy-0.6.5-3.fc26 qcas-0.5.3-5.fc26 giac-1.4.9.45-2.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-20e6c0f7cc
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526717
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-giacpy-0.6.5-3.fc27 qcas-0.5.3-5.fc27 giac-1.4.9.45-2.fc27 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6fd9d49e4d
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
--- Comment #11 from William Moreno ---
(In reply to Federico Bruni from comment #6)
> (In reply to William Moreno from comment #4)
> > Hello
> >
> > Advancing with this review in fedora we do not need:
> >
> > rm -rf %{buildroot}
> >
> > A
16 matches
Mail list logo
