https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540422
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks a lot, Robert-André
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4402
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539323
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen ---
Thank you for reviewing! :)
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4401
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539314
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks for reviewing, Robert!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - Latest version seems to be 0.0.6, please bump the version.
I probably can, though I am tracking package versions in S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539291
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Thank you, Robert-André
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4399
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541343
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4398
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520375
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4395
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4396
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4397
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513669
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet ---
And
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4393
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4394
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513669
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4392
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541337
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4391
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541334
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4390
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541340
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCL request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4389
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541342
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4388
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539554
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM request
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4387
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509856
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4385
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4386
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519719
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4383
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4384
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509119
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4380
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4381
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4382
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541346
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Make rpmlint happy and me sad:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/phpunit/phpunit7.git/commit/?id=d42d474d01d987b661216d6f2dab2d6d3984cee3
Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/phpunit/phpunit7.git/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541346
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - RPMLint error:
>
> phpunit7.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/bin/phpunit7 /usr/bin/env
> php
>
>Policy is not to use env in Fedora. What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509856
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - Version 3.0.0 has been published 4 days ago.
v2 is for PHPunit 6
v3 is for PHPunit 7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|DEFERRED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519719
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> Sh*t I forgot to check latest release, version 6.0.0 has been published 4
> days ago, please bump your package.
This package is v5 (v6 is review #1541340
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541862
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197
--- Comment #20 from Ben Rosser ---
copr is fine for scratch builds these days (it uses Koji behind the scenes).
Just a note, generally it's good to run "rpmlint" over your package before
uploading (e.g. "rpmlint [rpm]"). It frequently produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256104
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
The problem is that you previously defined elementary-wallpapers as %version in
pandora-wallpapers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541554
--- Comment #3 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Thanks for the review and approval.
I merged your PR, the link should be the same as the original posted above.
RE: manpage macro, it's probably because the '.' character appears first on a
newline f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
--- Comment #3 from David Benoit ---
Here is the rpmlint output of the updated package:
[dbenoit@dbenoit]$ rpmlint racket-6.12-1.fc27.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[dbenoit@dbenoit]$ rpmlint racket.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541554
Frantisek Kluknavsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541554
--- Comment #2 from Frantisek Kluknavsky ---
"MUST:rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review."
$ rpmlint ./podman-*
podman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274
--- Comment #26 from Peter Oliver ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #25)
> But fedora-review will automatically use posts that have the following
> construction:
>
> Spec URL:
> https://pagure.io/twitter-twemoji-fonts/raw/master/f/twi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also note that these dependencies may have their own dependencies as well, in
other words, lots of work ahead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
--- Comment #5 from Jens Reimann ---
Thanks for the quick review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #6)
>
> Done, but I still obtain some errors
>
> main.go:7:2: cannot find package "github.com/evilsocket/bettercap-ng/core"
> in any of:
> /usr/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
--- Comment #3 from Jens Reimann ---
Just to be sure: As the version/release changed, the new name/URL of the SRPM
is now:
https://dentrassi.de/download/4diac-forte/4diac-forte-1.9.0-0.1.M3.fc27.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
--- Comment #2 from Jens Reimann ---
Sorry, you are right. I mixed up Release with Version when it came to
. Also to "dist" variable was wrong.
I fixed both problems and also changed file under "/etc/sysconfig" to
"%config(noreplace)" as this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
That doesn't work, because Epoch isn't defined:
warning: line 35: Possible unexpanded macro in: Requires:
elementary-wallpapers = %{epoch}:0-0.1.20171230.git4f5b8e4.fc27
error: line 35: Invalid v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #10 from Germano Massullo ---
bettercap 2.0.0 will be released on 28 February 2018
https://github.com/evilsocket/bettercap-ng/milestones
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535207
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks for the reminder and sorry for the delay. I hoped we can wait for a new
release from upstream including latest (important) fixes. Maybe you want to
package a pre-release or shapshot?
*No copyrigh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||podv...@redhat.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542200
Bug ID: 1542200
Summary: Review Request: 4diac-forte - IEC 61499 runtime
environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274
--- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #24)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23)
> > I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the
> > original post, so that fedora-review can pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520375
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513669
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541441
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search-10-2.fc27 has been pushed to
the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-27-2.fc27 has been pushed to the
Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
scribus-generator-2.5-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509119
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-27-2.fc26 has been pushed to the
Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541346
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541340
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541337
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541334
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541343
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541342
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539554
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541862
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clover2. You may commit to the branch "f27"
in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509856
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509856
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541862
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Thank you for review!
About license tag: I noticed that README.md says this is under GPLv2, I will
modify this.
Now I proceed to importing process...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
rust-threadpool-1.7.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8cf4ad15b8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519719
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Sh*t I forgot to check latest release, version 6.0.0 has been published 4 days
ago, please bump your package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519719
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514274
--- Comment #24 from Peter Oliver ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #23)
> I need specifically links laid out specifically as they are in the
> original post, so that fedora-review can process it.
Are you sure that that’s the cause of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nss_nis
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922
--- Comment #12 from Federico Bruni ---
Hello William
I've made a new build in Copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fedelibre/extractpdfmark/build/709990/
I think I will do a new release (1.0.2-2) as soon as this request passes the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211821
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541862
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
Petr Kubat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
--- Comment #8 from Petr Kubat ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114146
--- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Julian C. Dunn from comment #11)
> This all seems reasonable. I updated it to rubygem-ffi-yajl 2.3.1 and
> rebuilt it
There is missing changelog entry, but this is just minor nit.
> Are we go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-threadpool. You may commit to the
branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541587
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I've rerun fedora-review, I still get the same error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373004
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364603
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(d...@redhat.com)
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364607
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(d...@redhat.com)
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463253
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbadi...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463538
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbadi...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
--- Comment #7 from Petr Kubat ---
(In reply to Matej Mužila from comment #6)
> The packaged version is 3.0 already. As long as I know, there is no more
> recent version yet.
Now that I am looking at the contents of the source rpm you are ri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
Matej Mužila changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mmuz...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
Petr Kubat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mmuz...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
google-noto-emoji-fonts-20170928-3.fc27 nototools-0-0.20170926.git0c99dff.fc27
has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4791ed67e5
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073
--- Comment #4 from Petr Kubat ---
>I think we absolutely should keep the name for the binary RPM.
After thinking about it a bit more I agree with keeping the name of the package
as nss_nis. Changing it to libnss_nis would have some positives
97 matches
Mail list logo