https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
--- Comment #14 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Those are only warnings (possibly because you don't BR setuptools). The build
fails because you don't BuildRequires: gcc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #10 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478210
--- Comment #18 from Stuart D Gathman ---
As I understand it, I will not be able to create an official EL7 package due to
the bundling requirement. Or is there a procedure for doing so? For my own
use, I build with:
rpmbuild -ba --with=bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478210
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478210
--- Comment #16 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Built for el7 (using --with=bundled) and testing that it still seems to work
with real EDI partners.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478210
--- Comment #15 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/openas2.spec
SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f27/src/openas2-2.6.1-4.fc30.src.rpm
Built for rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628752
Juston Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628752
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
ipmctl-01.00.00.3262-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fc4e7fc9bc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628752
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fips
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok ---
Without the last "and".
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Adding:
%if %{with_bundled_fonts}
%package -n python2-matplotlib-data-fonts
# STIX and Computer Modern is OFL
# DejaVu is Bitstream Vera and Public Domain
License:OFL and Bitstream Vera and Publi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #25 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #24)
> (In reply to Stefan Berger from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > > > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
--- Comment #13 from MartinKG ---
I am aware about this issue in rawhide.
upstream ticket: https://github.com/kivy/kivy/issues/5936
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599666
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
It's a bit problematic with the xvfb-run. Let's keep it how it is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Because it's a straight copy-paste of the old spec.
I can do that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #24 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Stefan Berger from comment #21)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> > > executable. > So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |lemen...@gmail.com
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Peter L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626134
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #23 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> - remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough
Actually added a license to the -devel package.
>
> - use regular section ord
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #22 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #20)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> > >- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #21 from Stefan Berger ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> > python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> > executable. > So I have to use python2.
> > Actually, I need python as well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #20 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #19)
> (In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
> >- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a
> >header & stab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478210
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> What Fedora release?
All reviews are made with Rawhide. Do your own mockbuild:
fedpkg --release f30 mockbuild --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64
--no-cleanup-after
I still have the same erro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #17)
>- dist'ing libswtpm_libtpms.so in -devel isn't useful if you don't provide a
>header & stable API to use it.
I don't see why this would be a prob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #18 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> python3 doesn't seem to create the symlink of python to the python3
> executable. > So I have to use python2.
> Actually, I need python as well. It seems to be the one setting the symlink.
> I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630799
Bug ID: 1630799
Summary: Review Request: python2-matplotlib - Python 2D
plotting library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611829
--- Comment #17 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
- remove the duplicated "License: BSD" lines, the top-level one is enough
- no need to duplicate %doc & %license for each pacakge
- use regular section order, %files come just before %changelog (th
38 matches
Mail list logo