https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-hkdf-0.0.3-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-xnat-0.3.11-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pybids-0.6.5-2.gite35ced6.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-indexed_gzip-0.8.7-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652305
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651365
--- Comment #1 from Luis Bazan ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31045513
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649570
--- Comment #12 from Jie Kang ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor
at the end has:
You should make sure the review ticket is closed. You are welcome to close it
once the package has been built on the requeste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428
Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428
--- Comment #9 from Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz
---
fedora-review output completed with manual review.
Issues found:
Looking to the spec there is not any line that does that, probably a false
positive.
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
Bug 1649577 depends on bug 1649569, which changed state.
Bug 1649569 Summary: Review Request: owasp-java-encoder - Collection of
high-performance low-overhead contextual encoders
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649569
Wh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649570
Salman Siddiqui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
Bug 1649574 depends on bug 1649570, which changed state.
Bug 1649570 Summary: Review Request: ee4j-parent - Parent POM file for Eclipse
Enterprise for Java projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649570
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649572
Salman Siddiqui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649569
Salman Siddiqui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
Bug 1649576 depends on bug 1649572, which changed state.
Bug 1649572 Summary: Review Request: dd-plist - A java library providing
support for ASCII, XML and binary property lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649572
W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649575
Bug 1649575 depends on bug 1649570, which changed state.
Bug 1649570 Summary: Review Request: ee4j-parent - Parent POM file for Eclipse
Enterprise for Java projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649570
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
Salman Siddiqui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649552
Bug 1649552 depends on bug 1649573, which changed state.
Bug 1649573 Summary: Review Request: directory-maven-plugin - Establish
locations for files in multi-module builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
What|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
Jie Kang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650987
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #5)
> Thanks a lot Fabio for this detailed feed-back. I will use your numbering to
> answer.
That was the idea. ;) I find it makes it a lot easier to structure suggest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650987
--- Comment #5 from Alain V. ---
Thanks a lot Fabio for this detailed feed-back. I will use your numbering to
answer.
1) Originally, I named it genht.spec, and developed the spec file as you
suggested (it was easier :).
But when I submitted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652305
Bug ID: 1652305
Summary: Review Request: dav1d - AV1 cross-platform Decoder
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590431
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #11 from Jie Kang ---
fix-info-plist-maven-plugin Package Review 1
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #10 from Salman Siddiqui ---
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sasiddiq/jmc/fedora-29-x86_64/00827653-fix-info-plist-maven-plugin/fix-info-plist-maven-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824
--- Comment #4 from Luis Bazan ---
Spec URL: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-elephant.spec
SRPM URL: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-elephant-0.6.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-xnat-0.3.11-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7c665c1711
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651388
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649572
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dd-plist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649570
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ee4j-parent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/directory-maven-plugin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #9 from Salman Siddiqui ---
Updated.
Add comment about maven requires generator.
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sasiddiq/jmc/fedora-29-x86_64/00827653-fix-info-plist-maven-plugin/fix-info-plist-maven-pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649569
--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/owasp-java-encoder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lsm5/kata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827650-kata-shim/kata-shim-1.3.1-6.git58f757d.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@redhat.com |jose.carlos.venegas.munoz@i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590423
Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
--- Comment #16 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Salman Siddiqui from comment #15)
> Updated.
>
> License changed to 'ASL 2.0'.
>
> SPEC URL:
> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sasiddiq/jmc/fedora-29-
> x86_64/00827487-di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
--- Comment #9 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Salman Siddiqui from comment #8)
> There is a script that is used to produce the tarball (it downloads a
> specific revision, NOT the tip):
> https://pagure.io/jmc-rpm/blob/master/f/jmc-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636812
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rav1e/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827545-rust-criterion-stats/rust-criterion-stats.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636814
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rav1e/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827567-rust-criterion/rust-criterion.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636813
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rav1e/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827564-rust-criterion-plot/rust-criterion-plot.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645681
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jca...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590423
--- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lsm5/kata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827561-kata-proxy/kata-proxy-1.3.1-5.gitd364b2e.fc30.src.rpm
Now built for all supported arches.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646795
Pavel Cahyna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pcah...@redhat.com
--- Comment #16 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
--- Comment #8 from Salman Siddiqui ---
There is a script that is used to produce the tarball (it downloads a specific
revision, NOT the tip):
https://pagure.io/jmc-rpm/blob/master/f/jmc-core/generate_jmc_core_tarball.sh
Would it be better to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
--- Comment #7 from Severin Gehwolf ---
# original source: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jmc/jmc/archive/tip.tar.gz
Source0:jmc-core-7.0.0.tar.gz
This won't work. Sources need to be reproducible. The only way to do this is to
use specific re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759
Luis Segundo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
--- Comment #3 from sensor@gmail.com ---
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/search?q=deepin&untracked=1&collection=f30
Packages is looks like well. very well~ :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652216
Bug ID: 1652216
Summary: Review Request: python-magic-wormhole-transit-relay -
Transit Relay server for Magic-Wormhole
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
--- Comment #2 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00827549-deepin-topbar/deepin-topbar-0.5.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
SPEC:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652212
Bug ID: 1652212
Summary: Review Request: python-magic-wormhole-mailbox-server -
Securely transfer data between computers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631987
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-deepdiff-3.3.0-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639186
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
libcerf-1.9-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590423
--- Comment #5 from Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz
---
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-hkdf-0.0.3-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eca7f0d205
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #11 from Jie Kang ---
Actually, I should wait till tomorrow at the least as today is the last day for
review. Sorry for the fluff.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #10 from Jie Kang ---
Yes looks like it. The review "page" is here:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jaf/reviews/1.2.1-release-review
The state says "successful" but the GitHub repository doesn't have any tags
(yet?). Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
--- Comment #6 from Mario Torre ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #5)
> JMC 7.0.0 is not yet released and the repository is in SNAPSHOT mode.
> Following [1] I think it makes sense to have snapshot information in the
> Release tag.
>
> [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #9 from Severin Gehwolf ---
From the spec:
Source0:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaf/archive/initial-contribution.tar.gz
So this looks like it's in the same boat as javamail 1.6.3?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/javamai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649569
--- Comment #13 from Salman Siddiqui ---
Updated.
Manifest version is now added at build time.
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sasiddiq/jmc/fedora-29-x86_64/00827488-owasp-java-encoder/owasp-java-encoder.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #7)
> Right, sorry I wasn't clear. I didn't mean to suggest copy and pasting the
> SPDX list, but only following the list with the appropriate names.
>
> Fedora recomm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649573
--- Comment #15 from Salman Siddiqui ---
Updated.
License changed to 'ASL 2.0'.
SPEC URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sasiddiq/jmc/fedora-29-x86_64/00827487-directory-maven-plugin/directory-maven-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1465889
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1652110
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652110
Bug ID: 1652110
Summary: Review Request: deepin-topbar - Topbar for Deepin
desktop environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649577
Jie Kang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jk...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Jie K
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590431
--- Comment #5 from Jose Carlos Venegas Munoz
---
I just tested Kata with the packaged version of fedora 28 (2.11) and fedora 29
(3.0.0) and the docker integration seems to work well.
200 Passed | 1 Failed.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #7)
> When you say requirements in place twice, do you mean the duplicate BR and R?
No. If an explicit "Requires: xz-java dd-plist" was being added, we'd have the
same
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #7 from Jie Kang ---
Right, sorry I wasn't clear. I didn't mean to suggest copy and pasting the SPDX
list, but only following the list with the appropriate names.
Fedora recommendations for multiple licenses are:
https://fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405548
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs-json-mode
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405547
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs-json-snatcher
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405546
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs-json-reformat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #7 from Jie Kang ---
When you say requirements in place twice, do you mean the duplicate BR and R?
Sure, a comment works for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092
Aurelien Bompard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092
--- Comment #19 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Thanks again. I've built the package for rawhide, building it for F29 would
require upgrading the aiosmtpd library and first I'd like to make sure it
doesn't break anything.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645766
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-azure-devtools
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-hkdf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172
--- Comment #28 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firejail
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652036
Bug ID: 1652036
Summary: Review Request: cockpit-session-recording - Package
provides session recording playback in Cockpit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651824
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651808
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the fast review!
dist-git requests:
f30: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8966
f29: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8967
f28: https://pagure.io/releng/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651759
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
This is not needed, when you package terminal_size, you need to patch the
metadata (rust2rpm -p) to remove the windows only deps:
[target.'cfg(windows)'.dependencies]
winapi = { version = "0.3", f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651962
Bug ID: 1651962
Summary: Review Request: GoldenCheetah - Cycling Performance
Software
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564683
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1651947 |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172
--- Comment #27 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Ondrej Dubaj from comment #26)
> Got it and fixed.
>
> Posting modified spec file and srpm:
>
> Spec URL:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/odubaj/firejail/master/firejail.spec
> SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564683
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1651947
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649576
--- Comment #6 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #5)
> The package will need to have a runtime dependency on dd-plist and xz-java
> as it does not include the packages in the jar it builds. It looks like the
> rpm bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574
--- Comment #6 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Jie Kang from comment #5)
> The notice file [1] has:
>
> SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 WITH
> Classpath-exception-2.0
>
> I believe the spec should follow thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405547
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Thanks for the review :)
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Group is not needed in Fedora
I will remove it on import
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405548
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Thanks for the review :)
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Group is not needed in Fedora
I will remove it on import
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo