https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663245
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks again!
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9619
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9620
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663168
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks!
SCM requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9617
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9618
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> - Use %bcond_with/%bcond_without for this:
>
> # uncomment to enable bootstrap mode
> %global bootstrap 1
>
> %if !0%{?bootstrap}
> %global tests 1
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671064
--- Comment #5 from Gergely Gombos ---
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, plus for directly including the patch
snippets! I have applied them plus updated the description.
Spec:
https://pagure.io/libldac/raw/master/f/libldac.spec
SRPM:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
This one needs the gap, GAPDoc, gap-pkg-autodoc, and gap-pkg-io packages from
the COPR repository to build successfully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Same issue as with primgrp. You have to build with the gap and GAPDoc packages
from the COPR repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
You're building with Rawhide's gap package, not the one in the COPR I gave in
the initial comment. That's not going to work. For this package, you must
have the gap and GAPDoc packages from the COPR reposi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668646
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
R-gsl-1.9.10.3-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669766
Bug 1669766 depends on bug 1668646, which changed state.
Bug 1668646 Summary: Review Request: R-gsl - Wrapper for the Gnu Scientific
Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668646
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672274
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Regexp-Trie-0.02-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571
--- Comment #14 from Justin W. Flory ---
I see, thanks for the pointers. Addressed in this commit [1]. SRPM [2], Koji
builds [3][4], and COPR [5] with it.
What is the next step to move forward with this package?
---
[1]
https://pagure.io/jf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672274
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Regexp-Trie-0.02-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402656
--- Comment #6 from Michael Hampton ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> (In reply to Michael Hampton from comment #0)
> Would you update your SPEC for a review?
Spec URL: https://error.fedorapeople.org/bdsync.spec
SRPM UR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662550
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Bump Mosquito? Please fix the variable as Zamir said.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662532
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663168
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663245
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661595
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402656
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660538
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659697
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #24 from J. Scheurich ---
Update
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune-0.99-2.fc29.src.rpm
Description: wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor,
simp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301270
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665303
--- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser ---
Great-- I'll prepare a PR for updating praw and submit it either tomorrow or
Saturday.
I guess it's probably worth invoking the non-responsive maintainer policy on
praw as well...
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325477
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665303
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
Sounds ideal!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659196
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665303
--- Comment #7 from Ben Rosser ---
Sorry for the delay on this... I did look into updating praw to 3.6.2 from
3.6.0. I discovered that, despite praw3 claiming it doesn't work with decorator
>= 4.1, it actually works fine-- I was at least able
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658931
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672833
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
mandoc-1.14.4-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a1fe63637e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mandoc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671064
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
License tag is fine. Packaging-wise it looks very good, too. I have some
nitpicks below:
1. I suggest listing pkgconfig and include files explicitly to avoid missing
changes from upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
--- Comment #4 from David Cantrell ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[IGNORED - this has not been upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Shea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ds...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #3 from David Shea ---
(In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672896
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ds...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
--- Comment #1 from David Cantrell ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: mandoc-debugsource :
/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671064
--- Comment #3 from Gergely Gombos ---
Hi, I have gotten the following reply from Tom Callaway:
"The LDAC implementation in libldac might be patented by Sony (the inventor of
the codec), but because Sony is also the author of libldac and they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672950
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671748
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672994
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2)
> This is mostly good; a few minor issues:
>
> - You have COPYING doubly listed in %doc and %license.
Done.
> - Should add the soversion to the %f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671748
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-pecl-pcov
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hashcat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672896
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Applify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636111
--- Comment #42 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glyr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671748
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review !
SCM requests:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9612
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9613
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672950
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack-Test-Agent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671748
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from V
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673214
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcantr...@redhat.com
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787
--- Comment #3 from Jan Macku ---
Hi Patrik,
URL to your SRPM package download html document not SRPM package, can you
please post correct URL?
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673393
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1673400
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673400
Bug ID: 1673400
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-antora-site-generator-default -
The default site generator pipeline for producing and
publishing static documentation sites with Antora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673393
Bug ID: 1673393
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-antora-cli - The command line
interface for Antora
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Done.
Spec URL: https://github.com/EasyCoding/hashcat/raw/master/hashcat.spec
SRPM URL:
https://xvitaly.fedorapeople.org/for-review/hashcat-5.1.0-2.fc29.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
J. Scheurich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muft...@web.de
--- Comment #1 from J.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
J. Scheurich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muft...@web.de
--- Comment #1 from J.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #23 from J. Scheurich ---
Update
Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune-0.99rc1312-2.fc30.src.rpm
Description: wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441
--- Comment #19 from Jan Macku ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jamacku/setconf/fedora-29-x86_64/00855916-setconf/setconf.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jamacku/setconf/fedora-29-x86
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
Bug ID: 1673317
Summary: Review Request: hashcat - Advanced password recovery
utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673317
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Assignee|n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
--- Comment #13 from Mark Goodwin ---
Thanks for the patch Xavier
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/goodwinos/grafana/native-rpm-spec/packaging/rpm/spec/grafana.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/~mgoodwin/grafana/grafana-5.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441
--- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok ---
Also note:
setconf.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/setconf.py 644 /usr/bin/env python
The "script" was not executable, so the shebang had no use what so ever. A
shebang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
J. Scheurich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muft...@web.de
--- Comment #1 from J.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671450
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelen ---
Thank you for the interest.
Yes, that would be ideal, but unfortunately, I am not a Go developer so I am
really not sure what it takes to change the library they are depending on.
Anyway, this is for yubihs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441
Petr Viktorin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pvikt...@redhat.com
--- Comment #17 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672896
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Thank you, Jikta. I've requested the repo and taken your comments into account.
Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Applify/perl-Applify.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~sey
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441
--- Comment #16 from Jan Macku ---
Hi Patrik,
I tried it, but the problem is, that this test require shebang in setconf.py.
The test run setconf.py several times with diferent parameters to different
files to test functionality of the setconf.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672896
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672896
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
81 matches
Mail list logo
