https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #23 from Jason A. Donenfeld ---
> I have the ability to sponsor him myself if he'd like when the package is
> finalized.
Is there any reason for this order of operations? Can we get Joe sponsored and
ready to serve as soon as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Dridi, you need update strip-nondeterminism.spec according to above mentioned,
to continue the review , until Peter approve this package .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684934
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
--- Comment #9 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL: https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-2.fc30.src.rpm
I cleaned up more empty files,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687442
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531950
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687443
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687440
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687402
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687427
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687404
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687411
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687287
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687407
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687386
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687283
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687390
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687394
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687396
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687387
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687284
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
Thanks! I filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8207 to request unretirement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687624
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687624
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33412177
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687620
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534052
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687620
--- Comment #3 from Eli Young ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - add a comment explaining what the patch is for
>
> - use a better name for your archive:
>
> Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687335
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687620
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215261
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||elysc...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687619
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #10 from Chris Caron ---
Robert,
thanks for your patients, round 4 is a lucky one perhaps? :)
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- In that case you can remove:
%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} > 7
# This package is not included with EPEL7
# glibc-all-langpacks used for LANG= line in %test reference
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687507
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #8 from Chris Caron ---
@Robert,
I dropped the .nuxref and changed the LANG= line to reflect your suggestion and
there doesn't appear to be any issues.
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687624
Bug ID: 1687624
Summary: Review Request: R-udunits2 - Udunits-2 Bindings for R
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687363
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687352
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also remove .nuxref in Release:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Is LANG=en_US.utf8 mandatory? What happens with LANG=C.UTF-8?
I'll let Artur finish the review if he wishes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687620
--- Comment #1 from Eli Young ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411770
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #5 from Chris Caron ---
Thank you guys for all your feedback. It was also suggested on the mailing
lists to not use flake8 as it's to harsh to fail a %test because of a pep8
issue. I couldn't agree with this more, so i dropped
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687620
Bug ID: 1687620
Summary: Review Request: python-biscuits - Fast and tasty
cookies handling
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687619
--- Comment #1 from Eli Young ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33411747
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687619
Bug ID: 1687619
Summary: Review Request: python-pytimeparse - Time expression
parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #22 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard-tools-0.0.20190227-2.fc31.src.rpm
(In reply to Joe Doss from comment #20)
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System ---
netatalk-3.1.12-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dustym...@redhat.com
--- Comment #21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #20 from Joe Doss ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #18)
> I would not mind some help but currently Joe Doss is not a member of the
> Packager group and would need to be sponsored. He, if he'd like to do so,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
R-ncdf4-1.16.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-44c5b5301f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687343
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #19 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Tibbs on IRC set me this guideline:
Epochs from Third Party Repositories
If a package to be imported is or previously was present in a publicly
accessible repository, the packager can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #18 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Jason A. Donenfeld from comment #16)
> > - or keeping wireguard as a meta package
>
> If you'd like to have a "wireguard" meta package, *in addition to the
> wireguard-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
opentrep-0.07.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685068
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libxls-1.5.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System ---
netatalk-3.1.12-4.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687274
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #17 from Joe Doss ---
Your response doesn't really address my questions, so let me rephrase:
We should make the needed changes between these two packages so we have some
sort of path to migrate people to the Fedora package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #16 from Jason A. Donenfeld ---
> - or keeping wireguard as a meta package
If you'd like to have a "wireguard" meta package, *in addition to the
wireguard-tools package*, that's totally fine with me. There might indeed at
some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #46 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also 0.7.4 was released this past day.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687260
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687235
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
The problem with your package is that it set Epoch: to 1 so it will always be
picked up over the Fedora package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: wireguard - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687216
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
Joe Doss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667661
--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok ---
Don't worry about it, this is not time critical. I'll bump the upstream issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556
--- Comment #27 from Martin Pitt ---
Anthony, the first push needs to happen manually. From then on, the cockpituous
bot will do releases automatically.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667661
--- Comment #10 from Patrik Kopkan ---
It is quite while since posting issue on github. From my understanding
python-gast need python-astunparse for tests right ? If so is there option that
to drop tests ?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556
--- Comment #26 from Anthony McInerney ---
I've added martinpitt as admin and cockpit as commit access.
Is the package going to be pushed automagically, or do i grab the srpm and
commit it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556
--- Comment #25 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cockpit-composer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687217
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Simplify the Source0:
Source0:
https://github.com/tsl0922/%{name}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- The LICENSE file must be included with %license not %doc
- Split the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687507
Bug ID: 1687507
Summary: Review Request: python-crayons - Python module for
writing colored text to terminal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665303
--- Comment #12 from Ben Rosser ---
Yes, sorry. The Rawhide build was still failing the last time I looked at this
(about a week ago)-- I think because even though praw 3.6.2 had been built,
there were compose failures. Anyway, it's working
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556
--- Comment #23 from Anthony McInerney ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10279#comment-559461
The review is not approved by the assignee of the Bugzilla bug
Metadata Update from @limb:
- Issue close_status updated to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671790
--- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Interesting difference could be bumped version of setuptools because of that
> it won't be build successfully in fedora 29.
The version in Fedora 29 is too low? See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687217
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687122
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671790
--- Comment #19 from Patrik Kopkan ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pkopkan/python-vistir/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00866815-python-vistir/python-vistir.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687062
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
--- Comment #18 from Joachim Frieben ---
Updated packages for the current release giza-1.1.0 are now available at COPR
via 'dnf copr enable frieben/giza'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-GIS-Distance-0.11-1.fc |perl-GIS-Distance-0.11-2.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687450
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841
Bug 1686841 depends on bug 1686788, which changed state.
Bug 1686788 Summary: Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic
distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788
Bug 1686788 depends on bug 1686753, which changed state.
Bug 1686753 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and
convert units of measurement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687450
Bug ID: 1687450
Summary: Review Request: perl-FFI-Platypus - Write Perl
bindings to non-Perl libraries with FFI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo