https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720049
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
resalloc-openstack-6-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-b5dbfb1cb5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b5dbfb1cb5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707711
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
xe-guest-utilities-7.12.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721564
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
zincati-rolling-3020190704205121.a23e773d has been pushed to the Fedora 30
Modular testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727502
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mcqd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727502
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jerry Jame
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725840
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707711
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
xe-guest-utilities-7.12.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720049
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924
--- Comment #12 from Steven Jay Munroe ---
Making progress on clean up of rpmlint issues:
Latest changes in pull request
https://github.com/open-power-sdk/pveclib/pull/79 for review.
Current results:
$ rpmlint ./rpmbuild/
pveclib.ppc64le: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728345
Cestmir Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721564
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-74e36a7052 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30
Modular. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-74e36a7052
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728381
Bug ID: 1728381
Summary: mdevctl - A mediated device persistence and management
utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728378
Bug ID: 1728378
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728378
Robert Fairley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|Telemetry service for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728373
Bug ID: 1728373
Summary: Review Request: python-glymur - Glymur is a Python
interface for JPEG 2000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Please fix the above mentioned problems, most notably the license tag.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> Will libsavitar-lulzbot be also needed?
It does not seem to be needed at this time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Please update the summaries of subpackages to mention libarcus-lulzbot instead
of plain libarcus.
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-arcus} ->
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-arcus-lulzbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
I've noticed the LGPLv3+ license for the main package vs AGPLv3+ in the devel
package. Seems like a forgotten remark in the original libarcus package as
well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726843
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Various notes about the spec:
Requires: python3-box
Requires: python3-click
Requires: python3-dotenv
Requires: python3-toml
Requires: python3-pyyaml
Is the automatic depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728348
Bug ID: 1728348
Summary: Review Request: libarcus-lulzbot -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728345
Bug ID: 1728345
Summary: Review Request: flent - The FLExible Network Tester
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
--- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok ---
I'm 75% sure the pathfix.py call is redundant an %py3_build and %py3_install
will handle that.
Running automated checks once more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
--- Comment #14 from David Moreau Simard ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/master/python-box.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/dmsimard/python-box-distgit/raw/master/python-box-3.4.2-1.fc30.src.rpm
Des
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
--- Comment #13 from David Moreau Simard ---
@Miro, box.py ends up in /usr/bin too: . So I guess we need to keep the shebang
for the script in /usr/bin and take out the one from site-packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707711
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707711
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e6e9ea6563 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e6e9ea6563
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728307
Bug ID: 1728307
Summary: Review Request: foundation-icons-fonts - Icons web
font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Statu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728300
Bug ID: 1728300
Summary: Review Request: sympa - Powerful multilingual List
Manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
St
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726585
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
For reference, this is the guidelines bit about the -devel packages:
"There are some notable exceptions to this packaging model, specifically:
compilers often include development files in the main package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726585
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Added rm -rf docs/_build/html/.{doctrees,buildinfo} - running a scratchbuild
now and will upload new spec and srpm if it builds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726585
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
> but there are many C++ headers
Yes, there are, but expected, see the breakdown for rpmlint output:
pythran.x86_64: E: devel-dependency boost-devel
This is expected, this is a package that compiles co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726585
Marcel Plch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|mp...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725840
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelen ---
Thank you for the review. Comments inline.
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> [...]
>
> = Issues
>
> 1. The project does advertise its license as LGPLv2+. However, there are
> files
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727502
Jakub Jelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jaku
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok ---
Anyway the shebang must be removed, not chnaged:
python3-box.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/box.py 644 /usr/bin/python3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726742
--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok ---
> it turns out that "%{__python3}" already supplied a "-s"
In fact, %{__python3} doesn't have -s, but %py3_build is trying to add -s and
errors liek this, as is tracked in bz1335203.
I'm back at this, so
45 matches
Mail list logo
