https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750942
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750938
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506
--- Comment #4 from Alessio ---
(In reply to Philip Kovacs from comment #2)
> Can you issue a release on your github instead of using git commit hashes in
> the spec? Just create an annotated tag then issue a release tarball, e.g.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506
--- Comment #3 from Alessio ---
(In reply to Philip Kovacs from comment #1)
> You should post direct links to the spec and srpm you want the reviewer to
> use. We download those and run software against them.
Ok. I will remember that.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747855
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747852
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750765
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750017
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
mate-optimus-19.10.3-5.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750019
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750263
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750102
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743781
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Upstream tagged 0.2.0, which should work with latest kong. Please update to
that, and it should build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506
--- Comment #2 from Philip Kovacs ---
Can you issue a release on your github instead of using git commit hashes in
the spec? Just create an annotated tag then issue a release tarball, e.g.
hasciicam-1.1.2.tar.bz2 (or whatevcer version you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
--- Comment #11 from Philip Kovacs ---
SPEC: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fastbit/raw/f30/f/fastbit.spec
SRPM:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/fastbit/2.0.3/13.fc30/src/fastbit-2.0.3-13.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506
--- Comment #1 from Philip Kovacs ---
You should post direct links to the spec and srpm you want the reviewer to use.
We download those and run software against them.
I am willing to fish around on your COPR for candidates, other reviewers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkde...@yahoo.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pdfarranger
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743048
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-niklasfasching-org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gthree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741587
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-brotli
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741582
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-libpsl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983
Bug ID: 1750983
Summary: Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM)
killer for linux systems.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743048
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704917
--- Comment #10 from Felix Schwarz ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #9)
> > "- Maybe you could use "python3-cssselect2" as package name?"
>
> No. The python guidelines are clear this needs to be a subpackage.
You are right
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741582
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741587
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440687
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718540
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Already asked two or three times to look at this on the mailing list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743689
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714001
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714009
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729056
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Gennadii Altukhov from comment #9)
> Hi,
>
> Now I can expect to see the rpm package spec here
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/projects/rpms/, right?
No you need to request it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743767
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
--- Comment #9 from Philip Kovacs ---
Please introduce yourself more clearly in the future. The spec difference
problem is on your side not my issue. I will ask a packager/proven packager to
get this done.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704917
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704958
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441427
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Refreshed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441427
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441427
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
--- Comment #8 from J. Scheurich ---
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
See: (this test has no URL)
Rpmlint
---
Checking:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
--- Comment #7 from J. Scheurich ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
--- Comment #6 from J. Scheurich ---
This is a informal review, i am not in the packager group 8-(
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611
Felix Schwarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611
Felix Schwarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |fschw...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750942
Bug ID: 1750942
Summary: Review Request: rust-cassowary - Implementation of the
Cassowary linear constraint solving algorithm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750938
Bug ID: 1750938
Summary: Review Request: rust-failure-tools - Various tools to
be used in conjunction with the 'failure' crate
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750501
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||package-review@lists.fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750137
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ego.corda...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750139
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744195
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748012
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Nice packaging though, I have nothing else to comment. Great work Spike!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747648
--- Comment #6 from Artem ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/nohang/fedora-30-x86_64/01031349-nohang/nohang.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748012
--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík ---
I am missing license file inside the source package. Do you think it is
feasible to add it into the release?
Also, licensecheck complains about incorrect FSF address. Do you think this
could be fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748012
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471
--- Comment #5 from serge_sans_paille ---
My fault, fixed and uploaded,
https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python.spec
https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python-0.23.1-0.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen ---
I marked it GPLv3 for now to be consistent, thanks:
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/dl-fedora/dl-fedora.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714377
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823
--- Comment #2 from Pino Toscano ---
Hm interesting: there are no libguestfs packages as BuildRequires, and thus the
tests that require guests are not run.
An extract of the mock build [1] on my Fedora 30:
--- Checking for programs for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
After fighting bugs in fedora-review, I found a real bug in this package.
It cannot be built in mock (therefore koji) because the tests run virt-builder
which requires access to the internet to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/conmon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748967
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-451cd14fd6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-451cd14fd6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748967
Martin Kutlak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823
Bug ID: 1750823
Summary: Review Request: virt-p2v - Convert a physical machine
to run on KVM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #6 from Petr Schindler ---
I'm sorry. I forgot to NOT copy the instructions.
List of require and provides seems sane to me:
Requires
dl-fedora (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-json5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748967
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-satyr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
Ah thanks - I can correct that...
It is partly my fault - actually the intention is GPL3+ but older Haskell Cabal
packaging doesn't make the distinction - so I should really update to Cabal
2...
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652588
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
> I was also contacted by Robert-Andre Mauchin by mail where he asked me to do
> some review on "fictional" package (it was glyr but with some (lot of)
> problems in spec) so I responded today with my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821
Jindrich Novy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750777
Bug ID: 1750777
Summary: Review Request: python-stompest - STOMP library for
Python including a synchronous client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý ---
In that case, it needs to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/dl-fedora explicitly says "GPL-3.0-only",
but the spec has "License: GPLv3+"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Petr Schindler from comment #2)
> This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
> also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
> - Add issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652588
Petr Schindler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pschindl@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750765
Bug ID: 1750765
Summary: Review Request: python-pycryptodome - Cryptographic
library for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
Petr Schindler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750590
--- Comment #1 from Artem ---
- pycryptodome - an almost drop-in replacement for the old PyCrypto library
- pycryptodomex (already packaged in Fedora) - a library independent of the old
PyCrypto
! One must avoid having both PyCrypto and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821
--- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/conmon/raw/master/f/conmon.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/conmon/blob/master/f/SRPMS/conmon-2.0.0-2.fc32.src.rpm
removed BR: go-md2man.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #5 from Lokesh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268435
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Hey Ilya, are you still interested in getting this package into fedora?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1333989
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745478
--- Comment #8 from Dan Horák ---
further comments
- missing BuildRequires: gcc
- fails to rebuild on ppc64le, because it installs the libs into /usr/lib/ -
https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/blob/master/src/Makefile#L57 is wrong
- distro-wide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750701
Bug ID: 1750701
Summary: Review Request: php-pragmarx-google2fa5 - Google
Two-Factor Authentication for PHP Package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
I cannot build the package:
Processing files: xtensor-python-debugsource-0.23.1-0.fc32.x86_64
RPM build errors:
error: Empty %files file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748967
Ernestas Kulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750667
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750658
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1750667
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750667
Bug ID: 1750667
Summary: Review Request: php-bacon-qr-code2 - Summary:
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750667
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1750658
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750658
Bug ID: 1750658
Summary: Review Request: php-dasprid-enum - PHP enum
implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo