https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
Kiran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kk762...@gmail.com
--- Comment #71 from Kiran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789919
--- Comment #2 from J. Scheurich ---
It do not build without disabling the debuginfo
I have no idea why
The problem is something with empty *debuginfo*.list 8-(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750103
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
dl-fedora-0.7.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789211
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789211
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789211
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #9 from Marcus Müller ---
(In reply to Antonio from comment #8)
> %set_build_flags
That works, thanks!
Updated:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/marcusmueller/signify-package/master/signify.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #8 from Antonio ---
%build
%set_build_flags
%make_build
%install
%make_install PREFIX=%{_prefix}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #7 from Marcus Müller ---
> Remove the code in %prep
Removed! Didn't expect it to work without.
> > [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
>
> Are you sure that flags are used?
>
> `%make_build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
Antonio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #5 from Marcus Müller ---
(In reply to Marcus Müller from comment #3)
to be specific:
> libwaive is included in the upstream source, but not being used (unless you
> `make PLEDGE=waive`, which I don't), so no action required.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #4 from Marcus Müller ---
(In reply to Ondřej Pohořelský from comment #1)
> This is informal review only. Feedback appreciated.
Feedback: thank you! Very much appreciated.
> I would advise you to contact upstream regarding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789980
Bug ID: 1789980
Summary: Review Request: slurp - Select a region in a Wayland
compositor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768027
--- Comment #3 from Marcus Müller ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2)
> * Wrong use of PREFIX in install section
> - Usage of '/usr' is definitely not right. If nothing else, there should
> be used %{_prefix} macro for this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771343
--- Comment #2 from Tim Knoll ---
We have re-uploaded the source RPM and spec files to a new location:
Spec URL:
https://github.com/intel-secl/trustagent/blob/v1.5.1/packages/trustagent-linux/src/build/trustagent-linux.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771338
Tim Knoll changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timothy.e.kn...@intel.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771346
Tim Knoll changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timothy.e.kn...@intel.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789969
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789969
Bug ID: 1789969
Summary: Review Request: jtc - JSON processing utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789919
--- Comment #1 from Antonio ---
Hi J.
Why do you disable debuginfo package:
%global debug_package %{nil}
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789919
Antonio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714
--- Comment #24 from Neal Gompa ---
Let's make the commented out kmod dependency this:
> # Requires: (kmod(wireguard.ko) if kernel)
That way, when we uncomment it, wireguard-tools can still be installed in
containers without pulling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789940
Bug ID: 1789940
Summary: Review Request: Pound - Reverse proxy and load
balancer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789919
Bug ID: 1789919
Summary: Review Request: freewrl-4.0 - FreeWRL is an X3D/VRML
open source viewer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714
--- Comment #23 from Joe Doss ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #20)
> Some changelog entries still contain Epoch prefixes in the version string.
> Those must be fixed as well.
> I Hope Neal doesn't mind this drive-by comment :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788178
Bug 1788178 depends on bug 1788170, which changed state.
Bug 1788170 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-DefHash - Manipulate defhash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788170
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788170
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462467
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #7)
> I don't have the time to work on this until next month, so I'd recommend
> finding a new reviewer. Sorry.
No problem. I've to see if I find the time by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714
--- Comment #22 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Group: is not needed.
Thank you for taking over, I don't have much cycle to take care of it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788178
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1788170
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788170
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1788178
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787216
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiomysql
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786955
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiosqlite
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788170
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Hash-DefHash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787306
--- Comment #3 from Razer ---
I have no time nor skills to be a fedora package maintainer, I'm just a
developper aiming to have his software available on fedora.
If this is not the right place to do it, please tell me
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786399
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-vincent-petithory-dataurl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786962
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788178
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786955
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for reviewing this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462467
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|sgall...@redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462467
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789783
Bug ID: 1789783
Summary: Review Request:
php-webimpress-http-middleware-compatibility-
Compatibility library for Draft PSR-15 HTTP Middleware
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789146
--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck ---
My plan is to track the latest systemd-networkd version in Fedora. The
systemd-networkd package in this review does not have any dependency on
specific systemd versions due to shared libraries etc. (like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789749
Bug ID: 1789749
Summary: Review Request: elements-alexandria - A lightweight
C++ utility library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789146
--- Comment #1 from Felix Schwarz ---
One problem I see is: What version should the package track?
For example CentOS 8 is currently lagging a bit behind RHEL 8 but CentOS 8 CR
has the newer version already. So one way or another there will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789146
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
Version|rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787714
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #20)
> Some changelog entries still contain Epoch prefixes in the version string.
> Those must be fixed as well.
> I Hope Neal doesn't mind this drive-by comment :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784230
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788170
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788893
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelen ---
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #5)
> They aren't the same, one shouldn't obsolete the other. (I ported
> yubihsm-connector from old to new gousb.)
Thank you for your input. I know, that
51 matches
Mail list logo
