https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805870
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sil-apparatus-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805894
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sil-ezra-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805886
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sil-dai-banna-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797363
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694366
--- Comment #31 from chedi toueiti ---
congrats, when can we expect the package to be added to src.fedoraproject.org
and be buildable in koji/bodhi ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806537
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yselk...@redhat.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806544
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1806537
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806544
Bug ID: 1806544
Summary: Review Request: gnome-panel - GNOME Flashback panel
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1806544
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806539
Bug ID: 1806539
Summary: Review Request: gnome-applets - Small applications for
the GNOME panel
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806537
Bug ID: 1806537
Summary: Review Request: gnome-flashback - GNOME Flashback
session
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805691
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805698
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805725
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805729
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805697
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805718
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806017
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801088
--- Comment #9 from Attila Lakatos ---
(In reply to Kairui Song from comment #7)
> Hi, I found some problems with the spec.
>
> > %build
> > mkdir -p ./m4
> > autoreconf -i -f -v --no-recursive ./
> > %configure \
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803479
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806386
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509290
Ingvar Hagelund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793187
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #22 from jiri vanek ---
Moreover yes.
> I commit into package openjfx the code from this review (openjfx 11) in
> rawhide.
In that moment I have to disable openjdk8 bindings.
> In meantime I fix the FTBFS of the package openjfx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806336
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from jiri vanek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
--- Comment #5 from jiri vanek ---
Sure. ty,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
%mvn_install runs tests at the end of the macro, that's how it works. There's
no separate way to run the tests. And all Java packages do it like this. So not
having a separate %check section is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
--- Comment #3 from jiri vanek ---
> > to %build ad %check?
> could you explain more?
From:
%mvn_build -f -s -- -Dmojo.java.target=1.7 -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true
and the trace above it, I'm guessing it is running check during build.
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo