https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623295
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623290
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
teampulls-0.2.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
teampulls-0.2.2-2.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
The changelog section is empty. Can you restore the changelog from the original
package spec?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ssdeep-3.4-2.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
sgtk-menu-1.3.1-3.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-logrusorgru-aurora-2.0-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ssdeep-3.4-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801423
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jerry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814401
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann ---
Just for information: The latest version xz-5.2.5 (still not in Rawhide)
contains man pages translated into German, which are also included in
manpages-4.0.0. Such translations provided by upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753
--- Comment #5 from Bob Hepple ---
Latest builds:
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01314682-ydotool/ydotool.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276
--- Comment #9 from Bob Hepple ---
latest builds:
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01314649-libuInputPlus/libuInputPlus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278
--- Comment #5 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks for your help with this, Robert-André.
I changed the spec file as suggested and have new builds:
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801423
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801423
--- Comment #6 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com ---
I have taken a look and the package looks good to me. The only issue that I
have found is that the package drags in the following unnecessary
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib (it appears to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815258
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #14 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
> > > License should be GPLv2+ and ISC (there is one file with ISC license)
> >
> > Fixed.
> This should be exactly
> GPLv2+ and ISC
Actually fixed now.
> I think Requires: hicolor-icon-theme is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #53 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809263
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
--- Comment #2 from Ernestas Kulik ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ekulik/python-pg8000/build/1314594/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
--- Comment #1 from Ernestas Kulik ---
This is a retired package in Fedora. I want to bring it back to be able to
build a newer version of python-testing.postgresql.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
Bug ID: 1815810
Summary: Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL
Driver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809262
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809261
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809723
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1809250
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809250
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1809723
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e1eb74b7a3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e1eb74b7a3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1a925773e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1a925773e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809250
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ee6dd5270c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee6dd5270c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808506
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - License file is missing, grab it from the git repo and install it
>
> %license LICENSE
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Any updates here Luis?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #13 from Guido Aulisi ---
Sorry for the long review, but this is a quite hard package IMHO
(In reply to Erich Eickmeyer from comment #11)
> > You didn't use the latest spec when unretiring this package and cut some of
> > the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808606
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809250
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808509
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01278846-libevdevPlus/libevdevPlus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814220
serge_sans_paille changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808606
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sgtk-menu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstwist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808509
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808506
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #9)
> However, even without the slashes, it contains the entire directory and the
> content in it.
Looks like that I missed that changes or was mixing up things.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #12 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
New files:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01314529-non-daw/non-daw.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #11 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
> You didn't use the latest spec when unretiring this package and cut some of
> the recent history, which could be useful.
Unfortunately, that spec wasn't available in src.fedoraproject.org, so I had
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808411
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #52 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #51)
> The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the
> python-nikola-doc subpackage files section:
>
> > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name}
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #51 from Neal Gompa ---
The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the
python-nikola-doc subpackage files section:
> %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name}
Please add that.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #50 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811410
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jama...@fc.up.pt) |
--- Comment #3 from José Matos ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #10 from Guido Aulisi ---
Versioning is not correct. Latest version in Fedora was 1.2.0-18...
so you should increment by one and start with
1.2.0-19%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit0}%{?dist}
You didn't use the latest spec when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815788
Bug ID: 1815788
Summary: Review Request: rust-bodhi-cli - Bodhi CLI client
based on bodhi-rs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815785
Bug ID: 1815785
Summary: Review Request: rust-fedora-update-feedback - Provide
feedback for fedora updates (inspired by
fedora-easy-karma)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-60dbf2a2c3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60dbf2a2c3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806386
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> - Split the doc into a noarch subpackage:
I don't think I should split html files into another subpackage for this rpm
for now.
This is required for large documentation:
- Large documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #9 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Hi Guido,
I went with your recommendation to remove ntk-fluid from BuildRequires.
However, during build process, I ran into this:
>Checking for program 'ntk-fluid' : not found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo-
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bodhi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-dashmap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #23 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/raysession
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Bug ID: 1815778
Summary: Review Request: rust-dashmap - Blazing fast concurrent
HashMap for Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #22 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Thanks, Ralf. I just filed a new issue with upstream and documented it in the
.spec. Additionally, I made a README-wayland explaining the situation. Thanks
for your help!
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the quick review!
dist-git repo request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/23395
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the review, Fabio! I'll get right on your review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Fabio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
