https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
Bug ID: 1815726
Summary: Re-Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design
theme for MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
Bug ID: 1815727
Summary: Re-Review Request: mkdocs-alabaster - Alabaster port
for MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
Bug ID: 1815728
Summary: Re-Review Request: mkdocs-bootstrap - Bootstrap theme
for MKDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815723
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815723
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-attohttpc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815729
Bug ID: 1815729
Summary: Re-Review Request: mkdocs-bootswatch - Bootswatch
themes for MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811410
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1815725, 1815726, 1815727,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1811410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1811410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1811410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815729
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1811410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1811410
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815723
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
(In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #2)
> Can you please help me to understand, what is wrong with this new SPEC file?
> It is not constructing proper Source URL.
> https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #49 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #48)
> Err strike that, it should be instead:
>
> > Source0:
> > https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/archive/v%{version}/nikola-%{version}.tar.gz
New version wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154
--- Comment #10 from José Matos ---
Actually I had at the header:
%{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}
and then later:
Source0: %{pypi_source}
There is new version with a working pypy_source:
Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/pytho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808288
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806386
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Thank you for comments:
- Why do you change the icon? And remove all icons?
Using system-wide icon enables the looks to change according to system style.
- Why don't you keep the desktop file in applica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
--- Comment #2 from Artur Iwicki ---
Ha, I've spotted both of those myself, but since I had to wait for the
dependencies to get approved, I decided to wait.
Either way, python-ssdeep got approved yesterday, so here's the updated spec
and a sc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808259
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thank for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809097
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #2 from Artem ---
Fixed, thanks.
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-32-x86_64/01314288-sgtk-menu/sgtk-menu.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-32-x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Ralf Senderek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808259
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/massdns
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shuffledns
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-notifications
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #19 from Ralf Senderek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808288
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-projectdiscovery-gologger
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Ralf Senderek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-logrusorgru-aurora
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
Guido Aulisi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(guido.aulisi@gmai |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #21 from Ralf Senderek ---
There is one point you'll have to work with upstream to resolve:
Ordinary users (not necessary JACK enthusiasts) will use raysession in a
standard installation with WAYLAND.
Once started in a terminal,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #7 from Guido Aulisi ---
This was reported by fedora-review:
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 2242560 bytes in 46 files.
See: http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Fabio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the review, Fabio! I'll get right on your review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the quick review!
dist-git repo request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/23395
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #22 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Thanks, Ralf. I just filed a new issue with upstream and documented it in the
.spec. Additionally, I made a README-wayland explaining the situation. Thanks
for your help!
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Bug ID: 1815778
Summary: Review Request: rust-dashmap - Blazing fast concurrent
HashMap for Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
--- Comment #23 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/raysession
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-dashmap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815778
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bodhi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo-
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #9 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Hi Guido,
I went with your recommendation to remove ntk-fluid from BuildRequires.
However, during build process, I ran into this:
>Checking for program 'ntk-fluid' : not found
>Cou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806386
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> - Split the doc into a noarch subpackage:
I don't think I should split html files into another subpackage for this rpm
for now.
This is required for large documentation:
- Large documentation m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807967
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-60dbf2a2c3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60dbf2a2c3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811354
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815785
Bug ID: 1815785
Summary: Review Request: rust-fedora-update-feedback - Provide
feedback for fedora updates (inspired by
fedora-easy-karma)
Product: Fedora
Versio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815788
Bug ID: 1815788
Summary: Review Request: rust-bodhi-cli - Bodhi CLI client
based on bodhi-rs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #10 from Guido Aulisi ---
Versioning is not correct. Latest version in Fedora was 1.2.0-18...
so you should increment by one and start with
1.2.0-19%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit0}%{?dist}
You didn't use the latest spec when unreti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811410
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jama...@fc.up.pt) |
--- Comment #3 from José Matos ---
(In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #50 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #51 from Neal Gompa ---
The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the
python-nikola-doc subpackage files section:
> %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name}
Please add that.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #52 from José Matos ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #51)
> The only remaining issue is that you're missing the following line in the
> python-nikola-doc subpackage files section:
>
> > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{pypi_name}
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808411
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #11 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
> You didn't use the latest spec when unretiring this package and cut some of
> the recent history, which could be useful.
Unfortunately, that spec wasn't available in src.fedoraproject.org, so I had
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #12 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
New files:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01314529-non-daw/non-daw.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #9)
> However, even without the slashes, it contains the entire directory and the
> content in it.
Looks like that I missed that changes or was mixing up things.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808506
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808509
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807981
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstwist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sgtk-menu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808606
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808287
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Bl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814220
serge_sans_paille changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01278846-libevdevPlus/libevdevPlus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/wef/ydotool/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808509
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809250
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808606
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811485
--- Comment #13 from Guido Aulisi ---
Sorry for the long review, but this is a quite hard package IMHO
(In reply to Erich Eickmeyer from comment #11)
> > You didn't use the latest spec when unretiring this package and cut some of
> > the rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Any updates here Luis?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808506
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - License file is missing, grab it from the git repo and install it
>
> %license LICENSE
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807337
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ee6dd5270c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee6dd5270c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo