https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830870
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fd6bac8065 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b95d0ce6b7 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-18cd5f0e4e has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774741
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f7b02980b0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f7b0298
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819148
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6e5fe0249d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818945
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6e5fe0249d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751160
LumÃr Balhar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lbal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774741
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1de4190a52 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1de4190
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832675
Bug ID: 1832675
Summary: Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - A collection of
LV2 plugins ported from the MDA VST plugins
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #64 from Honggang LI ---
https://release-monitoring.org/project/98355/
Create this project for upstream release monitoring for rshim.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832632
Bug ID: 1832632
Summary: Review Request: python-authres - RFC 5451
Authentication-Results Headers generation and parsing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795079
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822509
--- Comment #7 from Lyes Saadi ---
The notifier worked :P!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795079
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
A successful Koji scratch build.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44172011
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623
Bug ID: 1832623
Summary: Review Request: psi-notify -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: psi-notify |Review Request: psi-notify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830870
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f1bc3a1e88 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f1bc3a1e88
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Purusharth S changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822509
--- Comment #6 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks again Lyes!
Let's see if the notifier works this time!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828079
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note: warning: File listed twice:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832610
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||re...@seznam.cz
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832610
Bug ID: 1832610
Summary: Review Request: python-pcodedmp - VBA p-code
disassembler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Sta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827957
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= Issues =
- The "%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}}" line is not
nec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Purusharth S changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #13 from Kelly Brazil ---
Thanks for the suggestions. I updated the spec here:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc-packaging/master/rpmbuild/SPEC/python-jc.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816733
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Bug ID: 1832562
Summary: Review Request: tpcclib-v0.7.5 - Command line tools
for processing and analyzing data collected in Turku
PET Centre (TPC)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #12 from Artur Iwicki ---
>https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc-packaging/blob/master/rpmbuild/SPEC/python-jc.spec
This points to a syntax-highlighted HTML rendition of the spec. Please use "raw
file" links.
>%global desc JSON CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774741
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1de4190a52 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-1de4190a52
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774741
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f7b02980b0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f7b02980b0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441843
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Dieter ---
I'd really like to see this move forward, but I can't even install it right
now, in either Rawhide or F32:
sudo /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 33 --se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828079
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827957
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #62 from l...@mellanox.com ---
Michal / Honggang,
This is my first Fedora package. Any advice what the next steps would be?
Such as how to get it into fedora 33 or Redhat, how to make it visible to 'dnf'
install, etc.
Thanks!
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal-wlr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #7 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
BTW, I'll be adding @sway-sig as comaintainer for this package (and kanshi, I
guess), but I don't think it's suitable for the sway module. Won't build for
f31 anyways due to outdated pipewire.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #6 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
Thank you for the review!
> - Could not download Source2:
> https://emersion.fr/.well-known/openpgpkey/hu/dj3498u4hyyarh35rkjfnghbjxug6b19#/gpgkey-0FDE7BE0E88F5E48.gpg
>See: https://docs.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #49 from David Cantrell ---
The ticket is opened for my account to move to sponsor and per policy should be
resolved by the end of the week. If you want to follow that ticket:
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/420
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Brown ---
This is a requirement for the latest python-tenacity versions:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9973/44159973/build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Til
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Brown ---
Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/snecker/python-typeguard
Github Spec URL for copr repo: https://github.com/snecklifter/python-typeguard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
Bug ID: 1832392
Summary: Review Request:python-typeguard - Run-time type
checker for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818670
--- Comment #6 from Devin Acosta ---
Dominik,
I will see what I can do to try to adhere to the Go way of doing things,
however I am not a GoLang developer by any means. The Go Binary that I am
building requires 79 additional Go Language depe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830322
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830323
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #61 from l...@mellanox.com ---
Thanks a lot for the help!!!
The changes have been pushed. The 'fedpkg build' also seem passed.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rshim
$ fedpkg import ~/rshim-2.0.4-1.fc31.src.rpm
$ git commit -m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #4 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
I'm just being extra cautious because I feel that the constraint enforced on
source package should apply to the binary package as well.
Also, the bug in pipewire 0.3.2 is really subtle and I want to avoi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #11 from Kelly Brazil ---
Just checking if there is anything more I need to do here. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
Preeti Walia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pwaliac...@gmail.com
--- Comment #115 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #60 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rshim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830870
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wdisplays
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223
chedi toueiti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803223
--- Comment #11 from chedi toueiti ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an ope
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
Payal singh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||payalsinghc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann ---
(In reply to Aleksei Bavshin from comment #2)
> (In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #1)
> > >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libpipewire-0.3) >= 0.3.4
> > This would avoid the explicit (and redundant) depe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #2 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #1)
> >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libpipewire-0.3) >= 0.3.4
> This would avoid the explicit (and redundant) dependency on pipewire.
BR does not directly affect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Lefoul ---
This is a trivial package. All relevant MUSTs pass (after slightly rewriting
the description).
Note: It was also successfully tested in f31 and epel8 in the sympa solution
proposed here: https://github.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831981
--- Comment #1 from Till Hofmann ---
Some remarks:
* Why not just
>BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libpipewire-0.3) >= 0.3.4
This would avoid the explicit (and redundant) dependency on pipewire.
* The versioning constraint in
>pkgconfig(wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #59 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-18cd5f0e4e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-18cd5f0e4e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b95d0ce6b7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b95d0ce6b7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813648
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
68 matches
Mail list logo
