https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-078fd6a431 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-84cf8d20b2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834496
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-a1b70feb8c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e0db4e4fcc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e0db4e4f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ac7fd1c04 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ac7fd1c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834496
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6beba110a6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6beba110
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818945
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6ecb9adca3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819148
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6ecb9adca3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833473
Bug 1833473 depends on bug 1833472, which changed state.
Bug 1833472 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-compiler-libs-janestreet - OCaml
compiler libraries repackaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833472
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833472
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835263
Charles R. Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838306
Bug ID: 1838306
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-graph-gophers-graphql -
GraphQL server with a focus on ease of use
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834977
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cchardet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833741
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ac7fd1c04 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8ac7fd1c04
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833745
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e0db4e4fcc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e0db4e4fcc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834496
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6beba110a6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6beba110a6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818176
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/calls
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836540
--- Comment #5 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Thanks, Artur. Either way, I made the correction in the above-posted links
(Comment 3). :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #26 from Eric Sandeen ---
(to put a finer point on it, I'd drop the whole -devel package; make install
does not install headers, they aren't meant for public consumption)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #30 from Kelly Brazil ---
Let me know if there is anything I need to do. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #3 from Paul Dufresne ---
Created attachment 1690304
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1690304&action=edit
Paul Dufresne... version 1 (for this bug) of 7kaa.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
Paul Dufresne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dufres...@zoho.com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #25 from Eric Sandeen ---
If upstream is not building shared libraries or providing a stable API, Fedora
should not try to do on its own.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818176
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
8)
%files doc
%doc build/html LICENSE README.fedora
LICENSE should be marked as %license, not %doc.
Other (sub)packages don't have LICENSE packaged at all.
9) rpmlint screams with problems. I've pic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jakarta-activation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
> Done, but I was unable to use the macro neither to find it.
The macro is in python3-rpm-macros since yesterday:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/58 -- going
with a direct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review!
Two comments for posterity:
Yes, I plan to update to the latest version once we have Java 11 by default.
This package is still available on f32 due to the botched retirement, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--- Comment #2 from Fabien Boucher ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> spec sanity:
>
>
> 1) %global srcname zuul -> consider dropping this, I don't see it used
> anywhere in the spec
done
>
> 2) 0001-Remove-another-shebang-a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820850
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-jpillora-tld
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok ---
spec sanity:
1) %global srcname zuul -> consider dropping this, I don't see it used anywhere
in the spec
2) 0001-Remove-another-shebang-and-remove-useless-exec-bits.patch -> is the
mode thing supported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833405
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ufoLib2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #9 from Honggang LI ---
1 Package Review
2 ==
3
4 Legend:
5 [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
6 [ ] = Manual review needed
7
8
9 I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #8 from Honggang LI ---
Functional smoke test verified libvma works as expected. Performance
significantly improved.
+--+---+
|Socket over IPoIB |6.97 Gb/s |
+--+---+
|li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #7 from Honggang LI ---
$ cat -n libvma.spec
.
4 %{!?make_build: %global make_build %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} %{?mflags}
V=1}
It was my bad. I should told you to delete line 4.
5 %{!?_pkgdocdir: %global _pkgdocdir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838056
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|manipulate an IP address in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838056
Bug ID: 1838056
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #6 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to igor.ivanov.va from comment #5)
> Thank you for review
>
> libvma.spec has been updated accordingly.
>
> There are a couple of notes:
> 1. After applying changes to meet
> https://fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1837685
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
Fabien Boucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fbouc...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838033
Bug ID: 1838033
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-activation - Jakarta
Activation Specification and Implementation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838027
Bug ID: 1838027
Summary: Review Request: zuul - Trunk Gating System
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #24 from Simone Caronni ---
Thanks for the review. I'm updating to 1.0.3, upstream has disabled building
shared libraries:
https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/commit/9d5bb880e3c310012c75f590f53e0f70a8173cef#diff-e8acc63b1e238
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826621
--- Comment #21 from Neil Horman ---
sure, I'll take this offline though, so we don't confuse the review with
troubleshooting this. I'll send you email shortly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836540
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(fed...@svgames.pl |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807365
--- Comment #15 from Pander ---
Sorry, one more minor fix. Thanks for updating it.
Summary:
Fast and safe spellchecking C++ library and command-line tool
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836540
--- Comment #3 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01398558-mudita24/mudita24.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826621
--- Comment #20 from ArunPrabhu Vijayan ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #18)
> In regards to your koji issue, the build system uses kerberos to
> authenticate, and you need to configure the FEDORAPROJECT.ORG realm. You
> should get t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837793
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
57 matches
Mail list logo