https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #28 from markusN ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #27)
> Created attachment 1692463 [details]
> licensecheck.txt
>
> Full review below.
Thanks for the new review.
> Issues:
>
> [!]: License field in the package spec fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth ---
I wasn't suggesting having a dependency on 7kaa-music from the main package, I
was suggesting having a reverse dependency from the 7kaa-music package back to
the 7kaa package. This is the sort of case that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840134
--- Comment #5 from Igor Raits ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kio-fuse
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #29 from Sandro Mani ---
> I went through the licensecheck.txt file and verified the unclear extractions
> within the files.
> Would the following change be ok (twice in the spec file)?
> -%license LICENSE.txt
> +%license Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833475
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839147
Bug 1839147 depends on bug 1839146, which changed state.
Bug 1839146 Summary: Review Request: mingw-python-click - MinGW Windows Python
click library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839146
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840614
Bug ID: 1840614
Summary: Review Request: mass3 - Buckets enumerator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840614
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
Doc Type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840622
Bug ID: 1840622
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-tomnomnom-rawhttp -
Making HTTP requests with complete control
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840628
Bug ID: 1840628
Summary: Review Request: meg - Fetch many paths for many hosts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840628
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
Depends On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840622
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1840628
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
Bug ID: 1840632
Summary: Review Request: python-pymc3 -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual ---
I have disabled testing because it takes about 1 hour in my computer (that is
relatively fast)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837757
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839870
--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík ---
This package was already in Fedora, but was orphaned for too long. Check [1].
1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mk-files
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839870
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pzhu...@redhat.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839870
Pavel Zhukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839870
aegor...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aegor...@redhat.com
Assi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840711
Bug ID: 1840711
Summary: Review Request: dnsgen - Generates DNS names from
existing domain names
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840711
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
Doc Type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840713
Bug ID: 1840713
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-reconquest-loreley -
Simple and extensible colorizer for output
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840714
Bug ID: 1840714
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-reconquest-barely -
Status bar to pretty display of Golang program's
progress
Product: Fedora
Version: raw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840714
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1840713
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840713
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1840714
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815670
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
Sorry, I missed to make the new files available.
%changelog
* Mon May 18 2020 Fabian Affolter - 8.20.1.7-2
- Fix installation requirements (rhbz#1815670)
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839888
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
--- Comment #5 from Guido Aulisi ---
Some more findings:
1) License seems to be GPLv2+ and not GPLv3+
2) Restore default release tag, rpmdev-bumpspec isn't playing well with that
complex release tag
> Release:%{rel}%{dotprerel}%{?dist}
R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840632
--- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #2)
> How about adding a condition for the tests? E.g.,
>
> %bcond_with check
>
> %if %{with check}
> %check
> ...
> %endif
>
> Would help if one wants to run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840797
Bug ID: 1840797
Summary: Review Request: shhgit - GitHub secrets search tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840797
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
Doc Type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
Christopher Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol |
|ter.ch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832392
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Brown ---
Submitted a scratch build but Koji is unwell at the moment it seems:
OSError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system: '/var/tmp/koji/tasks/9906/45069906'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703721
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #14 from Andy Mender ---
@Artur Iwicki
Thanks a lot for pointing this out! I read the page on weak dependencies Paul
linked, but I somehow missed the subtlety of the section you linked.
@Paul Howarth
I think Artur is right, actual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627180
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725008
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766916
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Bug ID: 1840865
Summary: Review Request: lv2lint - LV2 turtle language checker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
Doc Type|-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840870
Bug ID: 1840870
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-HarryMichal-go-version -
Version normalizer and comparison library for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #3 from ycollet ---
Created attachment 1692809
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1692809&action=edit
A requested patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #2 from ycollet ---
Created attachment 1692808
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1692808&action=edit
The spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #4 from ycollet ---
I just fixed the spec file.
I added a patch because of a duplicated symbol problem on Fedora 32.
I don't understand the point 5 ?
In the Review request, I must add the spec file and not give an URL to the spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
No need patches here put it near your spec file. If you added patch then need
%autosetup -p1
URL should be this
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ycollet/fedora-spec/master/lv2lint/lv2lint.spec
You stil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
7. Change License: field to
Artistic 2.0
Here you can find all allowed licenses and how they must be writed in License:
field
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #7 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
8. Don't use glob * in %files section such way.
Change paths to something like
%{_bindir}/{name}*
%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #8 from ycollet ---
OK, Thanks.
I updated the build / install part. I removed %{set_build_flags} and used
%meson %meson_build and %meson_install.
I replaced the license by Artistic 2.0 and I fixed the %file part by using
%{name}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #9 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now please post direct links to updated Spec URL: and SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #10 from ycollet ---
The link to the lv2lint spec file on the COPR repo:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/01414984-lv2lint/lv2lint.spec
The link to the corresponding src rpm pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #11 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Just use
Spec URL: ...
SRPM URL: ...
As in first message.
And you still not removed BuildRoot string from spec!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #12 from ycollet ---
Ah, sorry. I thought you where talking about the %buildroot in the build and
install section.
I commit a change ASAP.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #30 from markusN ---
Thanks for the updates, much appreciated!
New RPMs:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45074748
rpmlint only shows a few warnings (see above, two have already been addressed
upstream).
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1692236 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1691395 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now post new URLs. It needed to make review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #14 from ycollet ---
I was waiting for the build to finish on COPR.
The link to the lv2lint spec file on the COPR repo:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/01414998-lv2lint/lv2lint.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #15 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
It is really need gcc-c++ to build? I don't see it in build.log
If not then remove it from BuildRequires.
Source0:
https://gitlab.com/drobilla/lv2lint/-/archive/%{version}/lv2lint-%{version}.tar.gz
can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #16 from ycollet ---
Yes, you're right, c++ was not required. I cleaned up the spec file.
The URL to the last version of the spec file:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ycollet/linuxmao/fedora-32-x86_64/0141500
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #18 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Now you need to get sponsored.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
Bug ID: 1840914
Summary: Review Request: mpsolve - Multiprecision polynomial
solver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
St
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #19 from ycollet ---
OK, thanks a lot for your review.
I will now try to find a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839352
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865
--- Comment #20 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I can be a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833475
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
I'm on it!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839352
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- There is a non-fatal error building the documentation. Look for several
instanc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #33 from San
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840224
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(stef...@figura.im
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
--- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen ---
(In reply to Guido Aulisi from comment #5)
> Some more findings:
>
> 1) License seems to be GPLv2+ and not GPLv3+
No, according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
--- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen ---
Spec URL: https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/ardour6/ardour6.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/ardour6/ardour6-6.0.0-2.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(brand...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820855
Bug 1820855 depends on bug 1820851, which changed state.
Bug 1820851 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-sizestr - Pretty
print byte counts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820851
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820918
Bug 1820918 depends on bug 1820851, which changed state.
Bug 1820851 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-jpillora-sizestr - Pretty
print byte counts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820851
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832979
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f3ed4c9caf has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823132
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820851
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b800d5de3e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787452
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817721
Bug 1817721 depends on bug 1808406, which changed state.
Bug 1808406 Summary: Review Request: python-cooldict - Some useful dict-like
structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823132
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-08bcf86079 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817721
Bug 1817721 depends on bug 1815103, which changed state.
Bug 1815103 Summary: unicorn-1.0.2-rc3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815103
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815670
--- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo ---
The new revision installs fine on Fedora 32:
# rpm -Uvh /tmp/python3-claripy-8.20.1.7-2.fc32.noarch.rpm
Verifying... # [100%]
Preparing...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825183
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
94 matches
Mail list logo