https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-40c75bb11a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867407
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-aae3af1953 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511
Stuart Campbell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d884e10277 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c998efb60b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f9876b6cf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861440
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Mark Goodwin
's needinfo:
Bug 1714432: Review Request: golang-github-robfig-cron - Cron library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714432
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868994
Bug ID: 1868994
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-ws-rs - Jakarta RESTful Web
Services
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868993
Bug ID: 1868993
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-servlet - Server-side API for
handling HTTP requests and responses
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868992
Bug ID: 1868992
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-server-pages - Jakarta Server
Pages (JSP)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868991
Bug ID: 1868991
Summary: Review Request: jakarta-el - Jakarta Expression
Language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
- latest version is packaged
- MIT license is correct
- package builds and installs successfully
- package conforms to OCaml Packaging Guidelines
Please adapt the BuildRequires: (foo and bar) to (foo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625
Bug 1862625 depends on bug 1862624, which changed state.
Bug 1862624 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-octavius - Ocamldoc comment syntax
parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862627
Bug 1862627 depends on bug 1862626, which changed state.
Bug 1862626 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-optcomp - Optional compilation
for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862622
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862627
Bug 1862627 depends on bug 1862622, which changed state.
Bug 1862622 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-enumerate - Generate a list
containing all values of a finite type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862622
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862619
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862620
Bug 1862620 depends on bug 1862619, which changed state.
Bug 1862619 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ppx-here - Expands [@here] into its
location
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862619
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-octavius
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-optcomp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4)
> It might be good to compare builds in mock and in koji, to check whether
> binaries actually get chmodded 555 or 755 ...
Yes, I'm going to do one build then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #6)
> Assuming the "and" is replaced with "with", package is APPROVED.
Will do, for all of my OCaml packages. Thank you, Fabio.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
Uh, I think I found the issue. glibc 2.32.9000 might be broken. Running the
mock build without "--enablerepo local" yields the correct permissions. :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Let me try again. I ran fedora-review with both "-m fedora-rawhide-x86_64" and
"-o '--enablerepo local'" flags to build against the latest and greatest, but
I've been noticing very weird buildroot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
> Same issues here:
>
> - duplicate Provides in main and -devel package (may not be problematic, as
> noted in other reviews)
> - wrong file permission on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thanks for the review, Fabio. That's weird. Dune usually sets the correct
permissions on files. I don't know why it failed this time, but I have fixed
them. New URLs:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862622
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-enumerate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862619
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862622
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Thank you, Jared!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862680
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f9876b6cf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f9876b6cf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c998efb60b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c998efb60b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9b95b9e6e7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9b95b9e6e7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d884e10277 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d884e10277
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862680
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jakarta-xml-ws
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #39 from igor.ivanov...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #37)
> Please create fedora update for libvma-9.0.2-1.fc32 and libvma build for F31.
>
> Install bodhi-client and run 'bodhi updates new --help' for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Same issues here:
- duplicate Provides in main and -devel package (may not be problematic, as
noted in other reviews)
- wrong file permission on executable (555 instead of 755)
- ldd fails to read
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867407
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-aae3af1953 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aae3af1953
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862795
--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson ---
Builds fine with a scratch build in koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49241448
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862626
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini ---
Same as in one of the other OCaml packages, the Provides seem to be duplicated
between the main and -devel package.
There also seem to be minor isses with the executable files, as shown by
rpmlint:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862619
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Thanks for the comments, Jerry, Richard. That sounds OK to me. I'll move on to
the next review when this has been built etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862624
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862680
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review! I have requested the repo and an f33 branch.
I wanted to look at some of your pending OCaml package reviews today for Swaps
anyway :-)
master:
54 matches
Mail list logo
