https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881604
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881612
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829523
--- Comment #2 from david08...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/davidsch/testing/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01772667-python-pysam/python-pysam.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/result
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495
--- Comment #16 from Carl George š¤ ---
I ran fedora-review on this, and it found another issue.
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
/h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891370
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-628a83992c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890821
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-82ed38f52a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880356
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4d0ceb5f4e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892693
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894726
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891370
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890821
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-aabefd4c4e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892646
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4e3511966a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894601
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-db6745bb0c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892778
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b20640a0a9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880356
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-2ea6267123 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895749
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-56c486ba0b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895745
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9c3ce08c96 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895203
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ce168aac0e has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893741
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893680
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893314
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895630
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894601
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880356
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895745
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895203
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886356
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886356
Bug 1886356 depends on bug 1886354, which changed state.
Bug 1886354 Summary: Review Request: libliftoff - Lightweight KMS plane library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886354
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867423
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6fa40ef357 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896988
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fd7b7bf8c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-fd7b7bf8c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880640
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318
--- Comment #68 from Bruno Cornec ---
To follow up with mindi's update:
SRPM:
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/32/x86_64/mondo-3.3.0-0.20201118013837.s3776M.fc32.src.rpm
SPEC: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/32/x86_64/mondo.spec
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
Bruno Cornec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bruno.cornec@hp.c |needinfo-
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898704
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427
--- Comment #16 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Mohamed Aboubakr from comment #14)
> Question related to
>
> %py3_build_egg
> %py3_install_egg
>
> I receive this error
>
>
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>/usr/con
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898704
Bug ID: 1898704
Summary: Review Request: python-tcxparser - Tcxparser is a
minimal parser for Garmin TCX file format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #29 from giovanni.cabi...@intel.com ---
Thanks Carl. I imported the SRPM into dist-git.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661
--- Comment #8 from Tom Gundersen ---
Thanks Neal!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427
David Duncan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(davd...@amazon.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
--- Comment #7 from Andy Mender ---
> Source1: %{url}/raw/v%{version}/debian/udev
> Source2: %{url}/raw/v%{version}/README.md
I had a look at the source tarball again and you don't actually have to attach
additional sources with Sourc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #28 from Carl George š¤ ---
Thanks for making those changes upstream. Yes, the current SRPM is ready to be
imported into dist-git.
One final piece of advice, it's a bad idea to force push and move tags in the
upstream repo. It br
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893321
--- Comment #9 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is a new build with missing:
- %license LICENSE
- %doc README.md
- Source2
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/raw/levelup/fedora-gtk2/awf-gtk2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #9 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is a new build with missing:
- %license LICENSE
- %doc README.md
- Source2
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/raw/levelup/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893327
--- Comment #7 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is a new build with:
- Source2
- %license LICENSE
- %doc README.md
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/human-theme/raw/master/fedora/human-theme-gtk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897883
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
--- Comment #6 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Okay, I found a way.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4743/55754743/python-rad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #27 from giovanni.cabi...@intel.com ---
Is it ok if I push the src rpm to dist-git?
Just to summarize:
* The upstream release (20.10) was changed to use the default numbering scheme
produced by autotools/libtool (as you suggested)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893661
--- Comment #5 from Tom Gundersen ---
Thanks for starting this process Christian, I'm really excited to see this
land!
Neal, is there anything I can do to help move the review forward?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878977
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bravado
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
--- Comment #5 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
You are so right! I fixed. I rebuilded. I updated.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807365
--- Comment #17 from Pander ---
Version 4.0.1 has been released. Please drop -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1 as that is
default. Also replace build dependency on ronn with one on pandoc. See also
https://github.com/nuspell/nuspell/issues/94 Please let m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756
--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen ---
Thankyou for the review,
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/30755
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867423
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6fa40ef357 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6fa40ef357
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895588
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898470
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1872227
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898470
Bug ID: 1898470
Summary: [Unretirement] Review Request: nodejs-object-assign -
ES6 Object.assign() ponyfill
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
70 matches
Mail list logo