https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901377
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901377
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898135
--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch ---
Thank you for taking a look at my package! I'll rework the SPEC today. I
started with a template spec using "rpmdev-newspec -t python python-pyerfa",
however the template provided by rpmdev-newspec seem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619610
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Version|31
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901377
--- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897619
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897619
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(chris.brown@redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901583
Bug ID: 1901583
Summary: Review Request: javapackages-bootstrap - A means of
bootstrapping Java Packages Tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901583
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #58 from Brandon Nielsen ---
Okay, I can verify the compiler works on armhfp. I'll just disable tests on
that platform.
Looking into s390x now, that will be harder since I don't seem to have any IBM
big iron laying around...
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881381
--- Comment #7 from Andy Mender ---
Got it! Thanks for the swift reply!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898312
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1898311 |
Summary|Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898311
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1898312 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898311
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
Bug ID: 1901665
Summary: Review Request: box86 - Linux Userspace x86 Emulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to limited time.
>
> This request is mainly a preparation to give to the emulator box86 a chance
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901583
--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
The review is ongoing, licensing is complex so it will take me some
time to complete. Items marked with "+" are passed, ones marked with
"-" are failed and need to be fixed or explained.
+ 1. spec fil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898312
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
Doc Typ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks. Should I close bug #1800429 as a duplicate of bug #1901665 then?
There's already some interest for review mentioned in the original request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895696
--- Comment #7 from Andy Mender ---
Fair enough. Thanks for the update!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
First, big thanks for bringing this package to Fedora! :)
> %check
> # Tests are failing for now
> %ctest || :
Any indication why they are failing? Could you add an extra comment explaining
that?
> %files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889021
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901740
Bug ID: 1901740
Summary: Review Request: lua-readline - Lua interface to the
readline and history libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901747
Bug ID: 1901747
Summary: Review Request: python-subprocess-tee - A
subprocess.run that works like tee, being able to
display output in real time while still capturing it
Pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bruno Cornec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|DEFERRED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
Bug 187317 depends on bug 476234, which changed state.
Bug 476234 Summary: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for
Mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901757
Bug ID: 1901757
Summary: Review Request: python-pyls_black - Black plugin for
the Python Language Server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
Bug ID: 1901758
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901759
Bug ID: 1901759
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901759
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|- Pygments theme
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|extensions for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Updated SPEC URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-pyls-spyder/python-pyls-spyder.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901757
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901759
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Updated SPEC URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-jupyterlab_pygments/python-jupyterlab_pygments.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
*** Bug 1800429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605
--- Comment #9 from John Kacur ---
Ah, now see what you meant by
Correct URL would be:
Source0:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests-%{version}.tar.xz
Which causes the following error:
+ cd realtime-tests-1.9
/va
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605
--- Comment #10 from John Kacur ---
I also did the latest build in COPR
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jkacur/realtime-tests/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495
--- Comment #20 from Carl George 🤠 ---
I was able to run the review tool against that copr build. It pointed out that
we have a complicated license situation, similar to qatlib. All licenses must
be reflected in the License field, using the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901829
Bug ID: 1901829
Summary: Review Request: php-yoast-phpunit-polyfills - Set of
polyfills for changed PHPUnit functionality
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901829
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
45 matches
Mail list logo