https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917278
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917281
--- Comment #5 from Jan Grulich ---
*** Bug 1917278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907048
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1924099
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923015
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
--- Comment #7 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo python-yaml2ical 1924217
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924206
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|unspecified |medium
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924167
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|unspecified |medium
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897436
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912668
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e6ae246a32 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899337
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Nick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912668
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907014
Nick Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|RELEASE_PENDING
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924343
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61158836
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924343
Bug ID: 1924343
Summary: Review Request: proxygen - A collection of C++ HTTP
libraries including an easy to use HTTP server.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917625
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920606
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dustym...@redhat.com
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920606
ericedens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
Spec URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-yaml2ical/python-yaml2ical.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/python-yaml2ical/python-yaml2ical-0.10.0-2.fc33.src.rpm
Change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
> Requires: python3dist(icalendar)
> Requires: python3dist(jinja2) >= 2.8
> Requires: python3dist(pbr) >= 1.6
> Requires: python3dist(pyyaml) >= 3.1
> Requires: python3dist(setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922774
--- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-DiagINC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923015
--- Comment #4 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-badoux-checkmail
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914739
--- Comment #9 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rteval
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914740
--- Comment #7 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rteval-loads
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922147
--- Comment #8 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdatovka
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894911
--- Comment #8 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-Builder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688
--- Comment #11 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/voikko-fi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921408
--- Comment #15 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plasma-firewall
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914637
--- Comment #7 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-boututils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907014
--- Comment #10 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cty
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922166
--- Comment #3 from Mohan Boddu ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/purple-mm-sms
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924217
Bug ID: 1924217
Summary: Review Request: python-yaml2ical - Convert YAML
meeting descriptions into iCalendar files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916936
--- Comment #23 from Ron Olson ---
I made the suggested changes and tested it using toolbox (woohoo, SilverBlue
for the win!) and it obsoleted libblocksruntime correctly.
As far as versioning the libs, the Apple CMake scripts don't do that,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
--- Comment #4 from niohiani ---
Thank you for all of the useful input. I'll look over all of this and start
making the necessary changes. I'm pretty sure I can slim down the Build
Requirements in the spec too. It might take a few days for me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922147
--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Waiting for repos:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/31972
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/31973
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/31974
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924167
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen ---
https://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/dec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924167
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This is to unsubpackage dec from ghc-servant - it is also be needed by
singleton-bool, which also needs to be unsubpackaged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924206
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This unpackages ghc-assoc from ghc-cabal-helper.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924206
Bug ID: 1924206
Summary: Review Request: ghc-assoc - Swap and assoc: Symmetric
and Semigroupy Bifunctors
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924167
Bug ID: 1924167
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dec - Decidable propositions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897436
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-4a03d26f9a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4a03d26f9a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917278
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909400
--- Comment #3 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Fixed an issue with the EPEL7 files list:
Updated spec URL:
https://gitlab.com/musicinmybrain/fedora-rpm/-/raw/d227b8a6559d277985bb616656746f684f38c4a8/python-setuptools_git_ls_files.spec
Updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807365
--- Comment #19 from Dimitrij Mijoski ---
(In reply to vishal vijayraghavan from comment #18)
> Nuspell package updated[1] to latest release 4.2.0.
> This update is build currently for rawhide only, please review and suggest
> updates if any.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567
--- Comment #10 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
I tried again to see if anything had changed; now there is a problem with
openshadinglanguage in Rawhide:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package openshadinglanguage-devel-1.11.10.0-6.fc34.x86_64
> req
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922858
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908922
--- Comment #13 from Ben Cotton ---
(In reply to Gergely Gombos from comment #11)
> Hi @Ben, any advancements on the legal review? Looks like this still is
> still blocking the FE-Legal ticket.
Not yet. I'll flag this with Red Hat Legal again
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917528
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881482
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(andrey.matyukov@i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881482
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@musicinmybrain.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919349
--- Comment #7 from d.hatay...@fujitsu.com ---
Dominik, Lianbo,
Thanks for your comments.
I've updated the spec file and source rpm file.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/d-hatayama/crash-modules-fedora-package-review/master/crash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919347
--- Comment #9 from d.hatay...@fujitsu.com ---
Dominik, Lianbo,
Thanks for your comments.
I've updated the spec file and source rpm file.
Spec URL:
http://raw.githubusercontent.com/d-hatayama/crash-modules-fedora-package-review/master/crash-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916936
--- Comment #22 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I see to the Epoch bump. Because 5.3.3 < 7.0.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Looks pretty good. Here is a first round of reviews. A few blockers here that
need fixing:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922774
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Thank you for the review, Jikta.
I've taken into account your feedback and updated the package:
Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-DiagINC/perl-Test-DiagINC.spec
SRPM URL:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
A few notes already:
- We use the `fedora-review` tool for the first round of reviews, and that
downloads the spec/srpm from the bug here, so we need to make sure that the
links we provide here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
61 matches
Mail list logo
