[Bug 1916190] Review Request: overlayfs-tools - OverlayFS layers manipulation tools

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916190 c...@musicinmybrain.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #18 from Jaya --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #17) > Yo still have "# java runtime decompiler launch script" in the launcher :) > > But nvm, will go through that more deeply. Yes :) my bad !! somehow missed that ;) Now

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #17 from jiri vanek --- Yo still have "# java runtime decompiler launch script" in the launcher :) But nvm, will go through that more deeply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #16 from Fabio Valentini --- There seems to be another problem: Your Source0 URL references %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, but the %setup call does still use "master". That most certainly won't work. You also don't need to document a

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #15 from Fabio Valentini --- Yes, this is like the recommended approach for packaging maven projects: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#maven However, I see one big issue: do **never** reference an upstream *branch*,

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #14 from Jaya --- Now I fixed it!! @jvanek and @decathor Could you please take a look? Spec file URL: https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 --- Comment #13 from Jaya --- @decatho...@gmail.com Thanks for your suggestion to use : %files -f maven/.mfiles Spec file URL: https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/openjdk-asmtools.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1933419] Review Request: js-jquery-ui - jQuery user interface

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933419 Silvie Chlupova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 1933471] Review Request: golang-github-hub - A command-line tool that makes git easier to use with GitHub

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933471 --- Comment #6 from Phil Dibowitz --- In fact, if I change the imports to use the gopkg.in path, go warns me: ``` $ go mod vendor go: finding module for package gopkg.in/russross/blackfriday.v2 go: found gopkg.in/russross/blackfriday.v2 in

[Bug 1926697] Review Request: openjdk-asmtools - An OpenSource project to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926697 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||decatho...@gmail.com --- Comment

<    1   2