https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1a22a7681e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b0b8a01fbe has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-347dc7561b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936414
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933464
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933464
Bug 1933464 depends on bug 1933462, which changed state.
Bug 1933462 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pastel - Terminal strings styling
with intuitive and clean API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933462
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937810
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935373
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1939769
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939769
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1935540
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939769
Bug ID: 1939769
Summary: Review Request: netcat - OpenBSD netcat to read and
write data across connections using TCP/IP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918034
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7179781469 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-56fe02602d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930941
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-826bbccbe6 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910057
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-895a56fedd has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914740
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b4753b5c80 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914739
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d8dc6ed9f2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925940
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936262
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-da10ff316c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938497
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ebe5c3b078 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-00d86aa2de has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911928
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-509e906760 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930941
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d178ae9083 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937081
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-39e4c6d41a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910057
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-0e5c3b9d2c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932375
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-5744d24919 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914740
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-3d4ad6eeab has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936262
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-83a2696965 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914739
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e0309e425b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938497
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-8d2670e9a1 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925940
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936262
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5f3bfd9abf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938497
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-af5db3a93c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914678
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4245c40478 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914678
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-74495023f5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-7179781469 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7179781469
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937081
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933950
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936208
Carl George 鸞 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927033
--- Comment #6 from Jijun Wang ---
Please see my response below. I also updated github with the suggested changes,
and did a koji build
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63926205).
>> So we cannot directly use the source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936208
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Filed a bug against filesystem for the missing directories as bug 1939724.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919656
--- Comment #7 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Thanks for the review.
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32927
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928272
--- Comment #10 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Thanks for the review.
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32926
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919655
--- Comment #8 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Thanks for the review.
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32925
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919654
--- Comment #9 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Thanks for the review.
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32924
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911928
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-509e906760 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-509e906760
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896502
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928969
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Ack on all the other fixes.
On libjabber, I am confused. Looking at it it looks like it should look for it
in the pidgin-2 directory and just work. :(
Instead it's looking up the purple plugin dir, then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917085
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938019
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo python-pcicrawler 1938019
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32922
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924206
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937041
--- Comment #2 from Onuralp SEZER ---
Thank you for review
URL updated to -> https://apps.kde.org/en/kirigami2.gallery
License changed to : LGPLv2+
- Remove trailing spaces (done)
- The appstream validation must be performed without
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919295
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938319
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938019
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917073
--- Comment #19 from Lyes Saadi ---
Hello,
So, forgot to add the COPYING file (from jlatexmath) as well with the fonts. I
will add it before importing it.
Anyway, I opened an issue in jlatexmath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937915
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919295
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> - Why are node_modules symbolic links to node_modules_prod? Why not put
> them directly at node_modules?
>
OK
> - useless-provides:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919295
--- Comment #10 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Your feedback on this batch of NodeJS CLI packages as a very experienced
reviewer is particularly welcome, by the way. I think these are some of the
first submissions under the new NodeJS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919295
--- Comment #9 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
> - Why are node_modules symbolic links to node_modules_prod? Why not put them
> directly at node_modules?
This is taken directly from the template at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919654
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919655
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919656
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928272
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937868
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Moerner ---
Thank you for the quick review and fixes! I have incorporated your changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918035
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928272
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930597
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930597
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #4)
> > # needs installed lsfrom
> > %bcond_with tests
Also I meant to add: I have since worked out a way to use the built binary
easily to run
the tests with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911928
--- Comment #7 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Additionally, I found both nose
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose) and mock
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePythonMock) in the generated
BR’s; I patched them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930597
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - You define that condition but never use it in %check:
>
> # needs installed lsfrom
> %bcond_with tests
>
> It doesn't seem there is any test run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918031
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886700
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930386
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Thanks.
Please add the latest URLs of the spec/srpm to the comment too, so that
fedora-review can find them.
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933216
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937868
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934902
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937201
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937201
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-codecov
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937744
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-symfony-requirements-checker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936161
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/librtprocess
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939404
--- Comment #1 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-mbrman
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934902
--- Comment #12 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rbanffy-3270-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925322
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-guest-agent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909383
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sleef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930441
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hedley
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934257
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asyncpg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935984
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/js-termynal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-56fe02602d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-56fe02602d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
