https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1929231
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
License:LGPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and ASL 2.0 and MPLv2.0 and
zlib
# Rizin as a package is targeting to be licensed/compiled as LGPLv3+
# however during build for Fedora the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896
--- Comment #9 from Rémi Lauzier ---
Thanks for the help!
i got the package to compile and the man page to install.
Can confirm that everything work on my end.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-347dc7561b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6bb1ba4bd0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2cb552bdcd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1271ec83fd has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to ericedens from comment #3)
> If possible, it'd be nice to stay consistent with upstream. I did some
> research, and these two reference (seem to) support using `/etc`:
>
> - "The /etc/ director
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-aaadac85ee has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-aaadac8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938471
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e03a72ed74 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-56fe02602d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935540
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-11c0280666 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936262
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5f3bfd9abf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943353
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c6c351209c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939978
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
Sent you a PR. Use go-md2man as indicated in the commit log.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
--- Comment #3 from ericedens ---
If possible, it'd be nice to stay consistent with upstream. I did some
research, and these two reference (seem to) support using `/etc`:
- "The /etc/ directory is reserved for configuration files that are lo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943526
Otto Urpelainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(alciregi@posteo.n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
> # Omit 'noreplace' since the values in these values are required for a system
> to run
> # correctly on Google Compute Engine.
> %config /etc/dracut.conf.d/*
> %config /etc/modprobe.d/*
If these aren't ac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-aaadac85ee has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-aaadac85ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6bb1ba4bd0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6bb1ba4bd0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
--- Comment #1 from ericedens ---
`fedora-review -b 1925323 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64`
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-2cb552bdcd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2cb552bdcd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941388
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
ericedens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941896
--- Comment #7 from Rémi Lauzier ---
Hi!
i manage to get the config file to install as file.
i just have a problem with the man page.
i must convert markdown to man page but i don't know how to do it.
Thanks for your time!
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944912
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945307
Bug ID: 1945307
Summary: Review Request: rust-sevctl - Administrative utility
for AMD SEV
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
Cole Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crobi...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939978
Ibiam changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941994
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cockpit-machines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150393
Danila Vershinin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cia...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
Connor Kuehl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cku...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
Connor Kuehl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
Riccardo Schirone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
Bug ID: 1945159
Summary: Review Request: rizin - reverse engineering framework,
fork of radare2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
Fabiano Fidêncio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(cku...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942392
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Lopez ---
(In reply to Connor Kuehl from comment #7)
> (In reply to Fabiano Fidêncio from comment #6)
> > [..]
> > [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> > Sergio, license is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941994
--- Comment #4 from Martin Pitt ---
Thanks for your review, Robert! Katerina fixed the License: field in
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-machines/commit/cc8c4afdc50f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943526
Alessio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(alciregi@posteo.n |
|et)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944554
--- Comment #6 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5)
> The usage is this one:
>
> my $loop = Glib::MainLoop->new ();
>
> That does not load Glib module. The test just expects that Glib::MainLoop
> was import
45 matches
Mail list logo
