https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951628
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33698
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33699
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951628
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951398
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33696
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33697
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951398
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928004
Matthieu Saulnier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942312
Bug 1942312 depends on bug 1928004, which changed state.
Bug 1928004 Summary: Review Request: python-slixmpp-omemo - OMEMO plugin for
Slixmpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928004
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950923
--- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Looks good but I'm wondering if we need to add the provides/obsoletes to the
python3 sub-package too. I installed the current package:
$ rpm -q python3-FireflyAlgorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923830
--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Almost there, a little more work needed :)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953254
bryce.a.car...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(package-review@li
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
bryce.a.car...@gmail.com has asked Package Review
for needinfo:
Bug 1953254: Review Request: SLiMgui - an evolutionary simulation framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953254
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Dovecot FTS |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |33
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|33 |rawhide
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |33
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Joan Moreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
Bug ID: 1953340
Summary: Review Request: Dovecot FTS Xapian plugin - Xapian
plugin for Dovecot
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870
--- Comment #12 from Ben Beasley ---
> This was not discussed because Fedora/EPEL repos have no appropriate packages
> and I have no plan to package them (see my note №1)
There’s no need to argue with me; I didn’t write the guidelines.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876864
--- Comment #10 from markusN ---
Thanks for your pointer.
Unfortunately I seem to have missed the train:
fedpkg request-repo kealib 1876864
Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60
days ago
Could you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870
--- Comment #11 from Eugene A. Pivnev ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #10)
Ok, let's go:
> 1. Upstream does not support building with an external copy of the
> dependency. If it did, you would NOT be permitted to bundle, no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870
--- Comment #10 from Ben Beasley ---
Please re-read the guidelines around bundled dependencies carefully; I think
you have some misunderstandings.
When you bundle dependencies, Fedora doesn’t require you to install the bundled
dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913870
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ti.eugene@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953326
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66655237
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953326
Bug ID: 1953326
Summary: Review Request: rust-futures-test - Common utilities
for testing components built off futures-rs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876864
--- Comment #9 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors
Start from step 7.
tl;dr:
$ fedpkg request-repo kealib 1876864
# Requests are processed manually - wait for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876864
--- Comment #8 from markusN ---
Thanks for approving the package.
What is the next step here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
28 matches
Mail list logo
