https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996378
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/cheeselee/deepin-manual/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03005103-deepin-manual/deepin-manual.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026791
--- Comment #2 from Jan ---
Thanks, removed %{dist} from the changelog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-mtime
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-io-extras
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rustix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-linux-raw-sys
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007918
--- Comment #2 from Frank Crawford ---
Jakub,
Thanks for looking at this, and taking it on. I'll go through your comments
sometime in the next few days and either adopt them or discuss them with you
further. At first glance, they look to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028306
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ab3fda6beb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028189
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Olivier Lemasle from comment #3)
> We just have to wait from upstream for the license clarification (the
> incorrect FSF address is not blocker as soon as upstream is informed:
> https://fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the review!
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/38806
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028306
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022991
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Girko ---
Hmm. Funny. I've just found out that cmake3 workaround is not needed even for
CentOS 7: i2pd build succeeds with cmake 2. I was using this workaround because
upstream uses it in its spec file. I have no idea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028189
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Lemasle ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> > - Please open a Pull Request on GitHub to upstream your patch, if possible.
>
> The patch isn't appropriate for upstream as is. That's the right patch for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007918
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007918
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkadl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #9 from Olivier Le
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Le
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #10 from Olivier L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026791
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mi...@olasagasti.info
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028189
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Olivier Lemasle from comment #1)
> - The opam file states that the license is "LGPL-3.0 with OCaml linking
> exception"; however, the included LICENSE file states that it is LGPL v2.1
> with exc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996378
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkadl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
You're right about the .ml files. I was thinking the toplevel-related .ml
files might be needed, but it looks like that is not the case. I have removed
them from the package.
The rpmlint messages did turn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419
--- Comment #6 from Olivier Lemasle ---
Thanks, I've removed the "Obsoletes", updated to latest upstream, updated the
license, and removed the code of conducts.
Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-rustix.spec
SRPM URL:
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
--- Comment #7 from Olivier Lemasle ---
Thanks, I've removed the "Obsoletes", updated the license, and removed the code
of conducts.
Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-io-extras.spec
SRPM URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Lemasle ---
Thanks for the reviews Jerry, and thanks Fabio for the comments.
- Regarding the license, you may have seen that I actually asked for
clarification in the fedora-legal thread you mentioned. Actually, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028189
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James ---
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks, Fabio.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle ---
- Package ocaml-mtime-devel includes both /usr/lib64/ocaml/mtime/mtime.ml and
/usr/lib64/ocaml/mtime/mtime.mli, whereas the Fedora OCaml Packaging Guidelines
state that for the -devel subpackage:
> .ml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o.lema...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028899
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028898
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028897
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028895
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028896
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028889
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028890
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2028900
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900
Bug ID: 2028900
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-cli - CLI tool for
developing, testing, and using Tree-sitter parsers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028899
Bug ID: 2028899
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-loader - Locates,
builds, and loads tree-sitter grammars at runtime
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028898
Bug ID: 2028898
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-config - User
configuration of tree-sitter's command line programs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028897
Bug ID: 2028897
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-tags - Library for
extracting tag information
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028896
Bug ID: 2028896
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter-highlight - Library
for performing syntax highlighting with Tree-sitter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028895
Bug ID: 2028895
Summary: Review Request: rust-tree-sitter - Rust bindings to
the Tree-sitter parsing library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028890
Bug ID: 2028890
Summary: Review Request: rust-html-escape - Library for
escaping special characters and unescaping HTML
entities in HTML
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028889
Bug ID: 2028889
Summary: Review Request: rust-smallbitvec - Bit vector
optimized for size and inline storage
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028876
Sandipan Roy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028876
Bug ID: 2028876
Summary: Review Request: python-volatility3 - The volatile
memory extraction framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028306
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028306
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #7 from kc...@redhat.com ---
I have redownload the libxo-1.6.0.tar.gz file and confirm the checksum as well
as made a change on the spec file per your comments. Please review it once
again.
Thanks a lot.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #6 from kc...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 1844620
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1844620&action=edit
libxo-1.6.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
Latest source rpm file of libxo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #5 from kc...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 1844618
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1844618&action=edit
libxo.spec
Reuploading the latest libxo.spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028862
Bug ID: 2028862
Summary: Review Request: python-sly - An implementation of lex
and yacc for Python 3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Lin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #4 from David Cantrell ---
Good tip. The cpio command has a typo, you need to do:
rpm2cpio libxo-1.6.0-1.el8.src.rpm | cpio -id
I also always forget cpio options, so I favor using "rpmdev-extract" which will
unpack an RPM or SRP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028306
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/public-inbox
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022657
--- Comment #2 from Sandipan Roy ---
Updated srpm and .spec according guidelines.
Spec URL: https://github.com/ByteHackr/sqlmap-fedora-rpm/blob/main/sqlmap.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/ByteHackr/sqlmap-fedora-rpm/blob/main/sqlmap-1.5.12-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011770
--- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno ---
There were packaging problems in both rust-zmq and rust-zmq-sys, related to the
"vendored" feature, which I removed completely in rust-zmq-sys-0.11.0-2.fc36
and the following:
Spec file: https://ueno.fedorape
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027872
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645172
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c |
|om)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) has canceled Package Review
's request for Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
's needinfo:
Bug 1832562: Review Request: tpcclib - Tools for processing data from Turku PET
Centre (TPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|A
68 matches
Mail list logo
