https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038734
--- Comment #9 from Alessio ---
(In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #8)
> - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
> %{name}.spec.
> Note: mygnuhealt.spec should be mygnuhealth.spec
> See: https://docs.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042789
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042789
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Add missing BuildRequires:
BuildRequires: git
BuildRequires: gtk3-devel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #10 from Dr Anirban Mitra ---
Build 3
This time build from sfd source as mandated by GPLv3
SPEC URL;
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fbf-mukti-fonts/blob/main/fbf-mukti-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fbf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042789
--- Comment #2 from fujiwara ---
Thank you.
I updated
https://fujiwara.fedorapeople.org/ibus/engine-gui-ci/ibus-engine-gui-ci.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034816
--- Comment #5 from Jaya ---
Hi Alice,
Thanks for the review. I have addressed the review comments.
Uploaded the files here:
Spec URL:
https://jhuttana.fedorapeople.org/java-jd-decompiler/java-jd-decompiler.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jhuttana.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050169
Bug ID: 2050169
Summary: Review Request: optee_client - OP-TEE Client API and
supplicant
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050169
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||245418 (ARMTracker),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) The links you gave are not raw file links. The way to share files are to
give raw links.
so for your package it will be
SPEC URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mitradranirban/fbf-mukti-font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #11 from Robert Mader ---
Just for understanding: would it still be possible to request this to be part
of a default setup? Or would that need to wait for Fedora 36?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039945
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039948
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039954
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039935
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039193
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Missing BuildRequires:
- perl-interpreter
- perl-devel
- gcc
- perl(strict)
- perl(warnings)
rpmlint warnings:
perl-HTML-Gumbo.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/HTML/Gumbo/Gumbo.b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #39 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6a61e0d790 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6a61e0d790
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Robert Mader from comment #11)
> Just for understanding: would it still be possible to request this to be
> part of a default setup? Or would that need to wait for Fedora 36?
Most of its depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049379
--- Comment #5 from David Duncan ---
SPEC: https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-c-common.spec
SRPM:
https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-c-common-0.6.14-4.fc35.src.rpm
Updated with the changes requested
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050275
Bug ID: 2050275
Summary: Review Request: opentoonz - 2D animation software
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050275
Diego Herrera changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049379
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Kyle Knapp from comment #4)
> Thanks Neal! I created a PR in the repository where David and I are
> developing the specfiles right now:
> https://github.com/davdunc/awscli-2-rpm/pull/30. It shoul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050281
Bug ID: 2050281
Summary: Review Request: python-pyABF - Python library for
reading files in Axon Binary Format (ABF)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050281
Vanessa Christopher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295
Bug ID: 2050295
Summary: Review Request: uniol-fonts - Unicode compliant Open
source Ol Chiki or Ol Cemet font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295
Dr Anirban Mitra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #12 from Dr Anirban Mitra ---
As I have been asked to submit more review requests to indicate I understand
the packaging process, I have already proposed to pack another of my fonts
uniol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a5b7268390 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a5b7268390
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983456
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(o.lemasle@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a9b767b74c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a9b767b74c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758
--- Comment #12 from Mattia Verga ---
(In reply to Dave Dykstra from comment #11)
> It looks to me like it is saying that using "All rights reserved" is not
> recommended, but if it's there, it can be ignored.
Yep, you can ignore my comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038734
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049379
--- Comment #7 from Kyle Knapp ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> (In reply to Kyle Knapp from comment #4)
> > Thanks Neal! I created a PR in the repository where David and I are
> > developing the specfiles right now:
> > https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758
--- Comment #13 from Dave Dykstra ---
I don't think I can depend on Fedora Golang macros, because they have not been
backported to epel7. There they are a part of the golang package, which I
maintain, so I could backport some of them if there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035792
--- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola ---
1) Dependencies added on -data and -devel, thanks.
2) excludearch and bz ticket added.
3) mrchem is not a Python package so this is void; it's a C++ program with a
Python interface
4) there are no static ex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982877
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d0d8a3d81 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d0d8a3d81
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983456
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(o.lemasle@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-985b15dfcf has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-985b15dfcf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050395
Bug ID: 2050395
Summary: Review Request: rust-fs-err - Drop-in replacement for
std::fs with more helpful error messages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050395
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2033090
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050275
Diego Herrera changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038734
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mygnuhealth
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038734
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038734
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049236
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050395
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050395
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050395
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks a lot for the fast review!
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41758
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41759
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/417
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048007
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978432
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mic...@michel-slm.name
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050434
Bug ID: 2050434
Summary: Review Request: python-accept-types - Determine the
best content to send in an HTTP response
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045930
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044720
Bug 2044720 depends on bug 2045930, which changed state.
Bug 2045930 Summary: Review Request: moodycamel-concurrentqueue - An
industrial-strength lock-free queue for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045930
What|Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044720
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-43d2855388 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045930
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-43d2855388 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036291
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2e3dcf8f0a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046287
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4337b6a7d1 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044720
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9dd27f09ca has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034723
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045930
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-9dd27f09ca has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044720
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-cb399d1bce has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050451
Bug ID: 2050451
Summary: Review Request: rust-arf-strings - Encoding and
decoding for ARF strings
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049808
--- Comment #2 from David Duncan ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #1)
> This depends on awscrt, marked it as a blocker. Meanwhile:
>
> - why rename this to awscli-2 ? If the intention is that both are parallel
> installabl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045930
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-cb399d1bce has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050451
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982877
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d0d8a3d81 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2d0d8a3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-985b15dfcf has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-985b15df
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #41 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043581
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2a101a0345 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013814
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-dbd820d712 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a5b7268390 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018705
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-12ca3ade13 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a9b767b74c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018705
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6cd25da316 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042789
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
running fedora-review tool on this package SRPM gave below output
Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) disttag is not present. You need to write
Release: 1
as
Release: 1%{?dist}
Read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/
2) The Source0 line is not the way i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Try using second line in your conf file as
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042789
--- Comment #4 from fujiwara ---
I updated
https://fujiwara.fedorapeople.org/ibus/engine-gui-ci/ibus-engine-gui-ci.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #14 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Use forge macros also here.
Read
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036341
Didik Supriadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036792
Bug 2036792 depends on bug 2036341, which changed state.
Bug 2036341 Summary: Review Request: janino - Super-small, super-fast Java
compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036341
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049656
--- Comment #1 from David Duncan ---
Spec URL: https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-c-compression.spec
SRPM URL:
https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-c-compression-0.2.14-4.fc35.src.rpm
Modified CMake to match the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049397
--- Comment #2 from David Duncan ---
SRPM URL:
https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-c-sdkutils-0.1.1-4.fc35.src.rpm
Updated the spec file and CMakeLists.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified abou
87 matches
Mail list logo
