https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051055
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051055
--- Comment #3 from Mark E. Fuller ---
Looks like all the requested changes have been made and that the package is
compliant - approved
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047560
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407
Bug 2052407 depends on bug 2052402, which changed state.
Bug 2052402 Summary: Review Request: rust-greetd_ipc - Implementation of the
greetd IPC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||rust-greetd_ipc-0.8.0-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407
Bug 2052407 depends on bug 2052400, which changed state.
Bug 2052400 Summary: Review Request: rust-enquote - Quotes and unquotes strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050552
Matthew Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Davis ---
(In reply to Matthew Davis from comment #4)
> Unable to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to blocks
Please ignore - Misread the definition. Since I am not a packager, I thought
my sponsor needed to double check my revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050876
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley ---
U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Davis ---
Unable to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to blocks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744
Matthew Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050876
Matthew Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051373
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-652885bb89 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051372
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-652885bb89 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026389
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f09192575e has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051373
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2ef52450a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051372
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2ef52450a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026389
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051373
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-419af3b3d4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051372
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-419af3b3d4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051373
Bug 2051373 depends on bug 2051372, which changed state.
Bug 2051372 Summary: Review Request: the_foundation - Opinionated C11 library
for low-level functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051372
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051372
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051373
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires again
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047560
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
I've refreshed it based on the discussion from the EPEL meeting today. Same
URLs for the spec and SRPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758
--- Comment #14 from Dave Dykstra ---
Mattia,
The updated package is now ready for further review:
Spec URL:
https://github.com/apptainer/apptainer/releases/download/v1.0.0-rc.2/apptainer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
Kaleb KEITHLEY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008
--- Comment #37 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/ffmpeg/ffmpeg.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/ffmpeg/ffmpeg-5.0-8.fc35.src.rpm
changelog
* Wed Feb 09 2022 Andreas Schneider - 5.0-8
- Build ag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/liborc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
Kaleb KEITHLEY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: liborc- |Review Request: liborc -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205249
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-dcd0d56559 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205249
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-dcd0d56559 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-dcd0d56559
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
--- Comment #4 from ecur...@redhat.com ---
Changes made. Updated links:
Spec URL:
https://ecurtin.fedorapeople.org/automotive_sig_packages/twincam/SPECS/twincam.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ecurtin.fedorapeople.org/automotive_sig_packages/twincam/SR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
> %pre
> exit 0
This can be dropped, since it does nothing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205249
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205249
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-56f8a0c311 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-56f8a0c311
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
--- Comment #17 from Kaleb KEITHLEY ---
(In reply to Michael S. from comment #16)
> So, there is still the question of latest version, but I think that's not a
> big problem, it will be updated sooner or later.
>
> The gpg verification is a n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
Michael S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
Michael S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)|
--- Comment #16 from Michael S. ---
So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Initial spec review:
> BuildRequires: libevent-devel
> BuildRequires: libcamera-devel
> BuildRequires: libdrm-devel
It seems that you're using Meson, and it discovers dependencies with pkgconfig,
so I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #1)
Thanks for the reviews!
> Additional note: %autorelease isn't terribly effective if you're putting
> version-release in manual changelog entries. You probably wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052620
Bug ID: 2052620
Summary: twincam - a lightweight camera application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050876
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Davis ---
Thank you for directing me to the documentation!
Based on the documentation I agree and verify the package complies with the
packaging guidelines.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806999
--- Comment #20 from Weiping ---
@zeb could you help review this package again, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-greetd_ipc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-enquote
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050876
--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley ---
Thank you for the review!
Regarding the listed issues, please see the rpmautospec documentation[1], and
note that the fedora-review tool does not yet understand rpmautospec.
[1] https://docs.pagure.org/Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049681
Major Hayden 🤠 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(davd...@amazon.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049681
--- Comment #2 from Major Hayden 🤠 ---
Using the `forgemeta` macros could save some work down the road:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control
Your spec could look somethi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049681
--- Comment #1 from Major Hayden 🤠 ---
I'm still waiting on COPR to finish its builds, but there are compile issues on
s390x:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mhayden/awscliv2/fedora-rawhide-s390x/03415438-s2n-tls/
If s39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035911
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|paul.wout...@aiven.io
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
--- Comment #9 from Germano Massullo ---
Today I am trying to fix the fedora-review problem once for all
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859
--- Comment #3 from Dr Anirban Mitra ---
fbf-beng-fonts should consist of all fonts created by our volunteers in Free /
Mukta Bangla Font Project https://www.nongnu.org/freebangfont which includes
Aakash, Likhan, Jamrul. Haritaki, Ani Mitra an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052024
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052024
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052024
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
rpmlint is silent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052024
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
As this package's upstream hosting is not simpler and clear, it becomes
difficult to decide font package naming.
I thought more on this and consulted someone also in our team.
Do you have plan to develop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048261
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I just had a look at upstream source.
It appears upstream is collection of 2 fonts Ani and MitraMono fonts.
As same tarball is used for creating 2 packages, I suggest do not create 2
packages.
I suggest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318
--- Comment #17 from Filip Januš ---
package ready
dnf install autoconf autoconf2.7x-2.71-1.el8.noarch.rpm
Dependencies resolved.
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051854
--- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> > Intel® oneVPL GPU Runtime
>
> We don't use (R)/(C)/(TM) or their unicode equivalents:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> #_tradema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen ---
For me fedora-review runs fine against this bug:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2052407
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2052407
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052407
Bug ID: 2052407
Summary: Review Request: greetd - Generic greeter daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
--- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen ---
I updated package to new %pymacros
Spec URL:
https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-3.fc36.src.rpm
SRPM URL:
https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/pyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052402
Bug ID: 2052402
Summary: Review Request: rust-greetd_ipc - Implementation of
the greetd IPC protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Lin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052400
Bug ID: 2052400
Summary: Review Request: rust-enquote - Quotes and unquotes
strings
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
St
79 matches
Mail list logo
