https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051879
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051859
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050295
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #33 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I decided to sponsor you now as other 2 package review may take some time.
Can you please login to https://src.fedoraproject.org and then logout to
refresh your account status?
The next process is descr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993506
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Yeah, I'd like to include the binary, I think it's pretty useful.
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-cpc/rust-cpc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-cpc/rus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993506
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Effective license calculation:
ASL 2.0 and (MIT or ASL 2.0) and MIT and (Unlicense or MIT) = ASL 2.0 and MIT
Full list:
# ASL 2.0: rust-decimal 2.1.0
# MIT or ASL 2.0: rust-bitflags 1.3.2
# MIT or ASL 2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035547
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2035548 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035548
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|2035547 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035548
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
You're right, it doesn't seem to be needed for this to build and the tests to
pass.
Spec URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-deser-hjson/rust-deser-hjson.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994234
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993294
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Good catch! Not sure how that ended up there, but it's not needed.
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-base-x/rust-base-x.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979754
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Put up https://github.com/vitiral/stfu8/pull/5 for the deps update.
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-stfu8 1979754
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42161
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979780
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
> Why does the crate contain both GPL and LGPL license texts if its license is
> only LGPL?
I suspect it's because GMP (which is wrapped by this crate) is dual licensed
under LGPL and GPL.
> The crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980205
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! Put up https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/3130 to fix the repo
URL and https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/3131 to add the missing
license files.
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-uucore_proc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981133
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! Put up https://github.com/bozaro/local-encoding-rs/pull/4 for the
dependency bump.
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-local-encoding 1981133
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42158
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
--- Comment #6 from Davide Cavalca ---
Filed https://github.com/la10736/temp_testdir/pull/5 to add the missing license
files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981129
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-daemonize 1981129
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42157
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981140
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-tokio-compat 1981140
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42156
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981141
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-impls 1981141
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42155
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983875
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-fscommon 1983875
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42154
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983876
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-fatfs 1983876
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42153
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983879
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-typed-builder 1983879
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42152
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983886
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-os-release 1983886
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42151
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983884
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks, will address comments and fix the license on import.
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-local_ipaddress 1983884
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/42150
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983887
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Yeah, ExcludeArch is probably better, as I don't think this would do anything
useful on s390x as it is. I'll retest with the latest version on import to be
sure.
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-aparato 198388
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053906
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1980198
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980198
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2053906
--- Comment #4 from Davide C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053906
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82755936
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053906
Bug ID: 2053906
Summary: Review Request: rust-os_display - Display strings in a
safe platform-appropriate way
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035547
Bug 2035547 depends on bug 2035545, which changed state.
Bug 2035545 Summary: Review Request: rust-minimad - Light Markdown parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035545
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035546
Bug 2035546 depends on bug 2035545, which changed state.
Bug 2035545 Summary: Review Request: rust-minimad - Light Markdown parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035545
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035568
Bug 2035568 depends on bug 2035560, which changed state.
Bug 2035560 Summary: Review Request: rust-strict - NonEmptyVec, a vec
guaranteed to hold at least one element
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035560
What|Remov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035545
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048270
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e65f189fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048271
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e65f189fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044700
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e65f189fba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7e3e819640 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-47d9bc51eb has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035369
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7a7736c314 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048271
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a875475190 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035792
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fd3326f130 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048270
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a875475190 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044700
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a875475190 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035792
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048271
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-06f4a03773 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048270
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-06f4a03773 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044700
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-06f4a03773 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053892
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2041190
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053892
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82750851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053892
Bug ID: 2053892
Summary: Review Request: rust-option-operations - Improve
arithmetic operations usability when dealing with
Options
Product: Fedora
Version: rawh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048271
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-269605ed97 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044700
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-269605ed97 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048270
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-269605ed97 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #9)
> Well, that's fine by me if it helps getting the patch applied. In general it
> would be nice if ROCm development would happen more in the open. As a Fedora
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040728
--- Comment #12 from Phil Cameron ---
Are any further changes needed?
Hope to hear soon.
Phil
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #10 from Felix Schwarz ---
Why does "rocm-comgr-devel-5.0.0-1.fc37.x86_64.rpm" provide
"rocm-compilersupport-devel"? If nothing depends on that specific name, I guess
we should not provide it.
One thought about naming:
The package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053875
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2053877
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053877
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053877
Bug ID: 2053877
Summary: Review Request: duf - Disk Usage/Free Utility, a
better 'df' alternative
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048156
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048157
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048153
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048154
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053875
Bug ID: 2053875
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-iglou-eu-wildcard - Fast
and light wildcard pattern matching. Fork from Minio
project
Product: Fedora
Vers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053822
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan S. ---
Thanks for the review!
1.) Thanks, I did not know about _vpath_builddir. Very useful!
2.) Unfortunately that installs the binary to /usr/feather, installs header
files at random places, installs libraries t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #9 from Felix Schwarz ---
> Sure, I realize my comment was very confusing, see updated. The issue is that
> upstream still wants to compile statically, but my patch forces dynamic
> linking. I need to figure out how to fix my pat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008
--- Comment #80 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a3794271c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008
--- Comment #78 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a3794271c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a3794271c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #77 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Newton ---
Here's the rocm-opencl build if you're interested:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-opencl/builds/
The rocm-opencl package is full of problems, but it might help if you want to
test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053822
Oleg Girko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
--- Comment #32 from Dr Anirban Mitra ---
Thank you very much Parag for teaching me proper RPM packaging. I learned a lot
interacting with you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035369
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7a7736c314 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7a7736c314
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050889
--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley ---
Added a workaround to generate the runtime requirements as BR’s.
Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/20220212/python-hatchling.spec
SRPM URL:
https://music.fedorapeople.org/20220212/python-hatchling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053822
Bug ID: 2053822
Summary: Review Request: featherwallet-1.0.1 - Free and
open-source Monero desktop wallet
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016597
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7e3e819640 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7e3e819640
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048456
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #31 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-47d9bc51eb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-47d9bc51eb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8d2bae75a1 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8d2bae75a1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8d2bae75a1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040990
Bug 2040990 depends on bug 2005925, which changed state.
Bug 2005925 Summary: Review Request: rust-atomic - Rust generic atomic wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040994
Bug 2040994 depends on bug 2005925, which changed state.
Bug 2005925 Summary: Review Request: rust-atomic - Rust generic atomic wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758
--- Comment #17 from Mattia Verga ---
Can you please backport the patch into the provided files, so that I can run
fedora-review? Otherwise it will fail and doesn't produce any useful output.
I think you have fixed all my points reported befo
94 matches
Mail list logo