https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056663
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! I prefer to keep the source package named golang-github-mroach-rom64 to
make this easier to update in the future with go2rpm; the binary package is
named rom64 already. Likewise for the check sect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062293
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Can we move forward with this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035289
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2053969
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053969
Bug 2053969 depends on bug 2053965, which changed state.
Bug 2053965 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-ps - Find, list,
and inspect processes from Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053965
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053969
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2035289
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053965
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053969
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: gopass -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053963
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
I changed this, but I forgot to upload and comment -_-. Sorry for the delay.
SPEC:
https://fale.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-martinhoefling-goxkcdpwgen/golang-github-martinhoefling-goxkcdpwgen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053968
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5e96c84cc1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5e96c84cc1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053964
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d50943202e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d50943202e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053964
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053969
--- Comment #3 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
> Should I close this request and create a new one with the right name as well?
You can just rename the BZ title and upload a new spec/srpm with the new name
for review.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053966
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053969
--- Comment #2 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
Hi Mikel,
Looking doctl, I notice that the "master" package is also named that way.
Should I close this request and create a new one with the right name as well?
Thanks a lot,
Fale
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056164
--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Thank you for the review, Mikel
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43043
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031584
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064943
Bug ID: 2064943
Summary: Review Request: python-colcon-rerun - Extension for
colcon to quickly re-run a recently executed verb
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056164
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
St
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064941
Bug ID: 2064941
Summary: Review Request:
python-colcon-installed-package-information -
Extensions for colcon to inspect packages which have
already been installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031226
--- Comment #8 from Maxwell G ---
(In reply to W. Michael Petullo from comment #7)
> Should I just remove the binaries? As you stated, they seem relevant only
> when compiling and testing the package.
cmd/jsontoml cmd/tomljson cmd/tomll are i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064935
Bug ID: 2064935
Summary: Review Request: unclutter-xfixes - Hides the cursor on
inactivity
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570
--- Comment #8 from Jerry James ---
Thanks for the review, Ankur.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982911
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b61e15b0f2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982911
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4fc9a756bf has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012994
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012989
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982911
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-e612302bf3 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063445
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2bfaa0888e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James ---
The license of the doc subpackage has been set to "GPLv3 and MIT" with an
explanatory comment above it. New URLs:
Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-primecountpy/python-primecountpy.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963740
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|kde-settings|cryfs
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963740
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(n...@kde.org) |
--- Comment #12 from Nate Graham ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708
Kaleb KEITHLEY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056663
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mi...@olasagasti.info
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991150
--- Comment #3 from José Ignacio Tornos Martínez ---
It's a great job.
To pass I would only need to confirm that the latest versions on github behave
the same and something to justify the %check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991150
--- Comment #2 from José Ignacio Tornos Martínez ---
fedora-review tool output + manual checks and extra notes
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061077
--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Ah, awesome! Thank you. I'll make the tweak now and request SCM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Yes, bundling them with the necessary provides should be fine. I think that the
License field may need to be updated to include the licenses of the bundled
bits, though?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051874
--- Comment #18 from Jan Macku ---
Relation between initscripts and initscripts-rename-device you described is due
to compatibility reasons. Initscripts-rename-device needs to be installed by
default (RHEL9) to ensure backwards compatibility s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064142
--- Comment #3 from Mads Kiilerich ---
Ok - I didn't look closely and thought the explicit version was for the old
compat packages.
(But FWIW, .rust2rpm.conf seems a bit secret. It is not in -h and there is no
man page - only mentioned on htt
46 matches
Mail list logo
