https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028900
--- Comment #12 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
Spec URL:
https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/tree-sitter-cli/rust-tree-sitter-cli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alebastr.fedorapeople.org/review/tree-sitter-cli/rust-tree-sitter-cli-0.20.6-1.fc36.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068097
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-24d03ea25e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068097
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-73a387efba has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038469
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a8d29865fb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038469
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d6bcfee763 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068097
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e0baea3c8b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068097
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-87985f6a4d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063554
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8d6e154791 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024814
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1ecdd99f7d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068097
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ff2996c093 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063554
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-303f8a255a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024814
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-316b915c11 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069851
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-50a2685dce has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-50a2685dce
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-const_format 1993292
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
Spec URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-const_format/rust-const_format.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-const_format/rust-const_format-0.2.22-1.fc37.src.rpm
Ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993291
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo rust-const_format_proc_macros 1993291
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43363
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mic...@michel-slm.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993291
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069800
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f39a6d8e0 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068968
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7f39a6d8e0 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 5s
โฏ fedpkg request-repo rust-is_ci 2071119
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43359
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 2s
โฏ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 5s
โฏ fedpkg request-repo rust-owo-colors 2071125
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43355
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
I did a PR adding the license text. Since the PR also modifies Cargo.toml,
which in the crate is Cargo.toml.orig, I can't apply it directly so I'm pulling
in the text I added as an additional sour
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071122
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 6s
โฏ fedpkg request-repo rust-supports-unicode 2071122
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43351
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071121
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 5s
โฏ fedpkg request-repo rust-supports-hyperlinks 2071121
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43347
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071120
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Thanks!
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4 took 14s
โฏ fedpkg request-repo rust-supports-color 2071120
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43343
specs on ๎ master [?] via ๐ v5.4.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071120
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
MIT requires the license text to be present.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071121
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071122
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071121
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071122
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071120
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcava...@fb.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
Bug ID: 2071125
Summary: Review Request: rust-owo-colors - Zero-allocation
terminal colors that'll make people go owo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071125
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071122
Bug ID: 2071122
Summary: Review Request: rust-supports-unicode - Detects
whether a terminal supports unicode
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071122
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2070649
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071121
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2070649
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071121
Bug ID: 2071121
Summary: Review Request: rust-supports-hyperlinks - Detects
whether a terminal supports rendering hyperlinks
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2071120
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071120
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2070649
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071120
Bug ID: 2071120
Summary: Review Request: rust-supports-color - Detects whether
a terminal supports color, and gives details about
that support
Product: Fedora
Ve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071119
Bug ID: 2071119
Summary: Review Request: rust-is_ci - Super lightweight CI
environment checker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede ---
> Maybe instead just remove the binary from SDL_sound, since this effectively
> replaces that.
Yes that would be fine too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #6)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> > > %files
> > > %license LICENSE.txt
> > > %doc docs/CREDITS.txt docs/README.txt
> > > %{_bindir}/playsound
> > > %{_l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
--- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> > %files
> > %license LICENSE.txt
> > %doc docs/CREDITS.txt docs/README.txt
> > %{_bindir}/playsound
> > %{_libdir}/libSDL2_sound.so.2{,.*}
>
> Can you please sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
> %files
> %license LICENSE.txt
> %doc docs/CREDITS.txt docs/README.txt
> %{_bindir}/playsound
> %{_libdir}/libSDL2_sound.so.2{,.*}
Can you please split out playsound into a subpackage so that this is multil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hdego...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1947732
--- Comment #3 from Hans de G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
Hi Carmelo,
Thanks for the effort, and overall a good package! I see a couple of things to
tweak before it's approvable:
1. For future request, please provide direct links and not links that re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070881
Bug ID: 2070881
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mock - gomock is a
mocking framework for the Go programming language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070860
Bug ID: 2070860
Summary: Review Request:
golang-bitbucket-creachadair-stringset - A lightweight
set-of-strings implementation based on the Go built-in
map type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687
Nikola Forrรณ changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nfo...@redhat.com |needinfo?(benson_muite@emai
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Nikola Forrรณ has canceled Package Review
's request for Nikola Forrรณ
's needinfo:
Bug 1813687: aspell-sw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687
--- Comment #17 from Nikola Forrรณ ---
Benson, are you still interested in p
65 matches
Mail list logo