https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080029
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
- there's a few bundled libraries (nanojpeg, lodepng, possibly others) that
aren't under GPLv3. These should probably be declared (as I don't think they'd
be easy to unbundle) and the license field update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080029
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the tex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080029
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dcava...@fb.com
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080809
Bug ID: 2080809
Summary: Review Request: python-pyvips - Python binding for the
libvips image processing library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073824
--- Comment #2 from Iztok Fister Jr. ---
Thank you for review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077128
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-ff4479fc04 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073824
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077128
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-44213d365d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073825
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068182
Bug 2068182 depends on bug 2068176, which changed state.
Bug 2068176 Summary: Review Request: python-google-cloud-common - Python Client
for Google Cloud Common
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068176
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077128
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-72a3a5e07f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077128
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048131
--- Comment #3 from Chris Adams ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048131
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073825
--- Comment #3 from Iztok Fister Jr. ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/firefly-cpp/rpm-reviews/niaarm/python-niaarm.spec
SRPM:
https://github.com/firefly-cpp/rpm-reviews/raw/niaarm/python-niaarm-0.1.6-1.fc34.src.rpm
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073825
Iztok Fister Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(iztok@iztok-jr-fi |
|ster.eu)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078592
--- Comment #4 from Pino Toscano ---
Hi Petr,
thanks for the review! Note that this is mostly a split of an existing binary
package to its new source from the "subscription-manager" source -- see my
notes in comment #1.
> I am not sure why /
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077832
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f3ae4dbd0c has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056247
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
> INFO: installing package(s):
> /builddir/netplan-debuginfo-0.104-1.fc37.x86_64.rpm
> /builddir/netplan-debugsource-0.104-1.fc37.x86_64.rpm
> /builddir/netplan-devel-0.104-1.fc37.x86_64.rpm
> /builddir/n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048131
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056247
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057594
--- Comment #4 from Petr Menšík ---
I would recommend also including %name in url, it makes nice archives:
Source0:%{url}/archive/refs/tags/upstream/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057594
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057594
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pemen...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057594
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078592
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues found:
- /etc/rhsm is owned both by subscription-manager and
subscr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079289
--- Comment #2 from Carmelo Sarta ---
Thank you Fabio for the review, I updated the srpm link in the previous
comment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079289
Carmelo Sarta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078592
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075980
--- Comment #2 from Carmelo Sarta ---
Hi Fabio, thanks again for this review!
I needed this package since it's a dependency for the following crate
https://crates.io/crates/xh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076023
--- Comment #2 from Carmelo Sarta ---
Hi Fabio, thank you for all your reviews!
I needed this package for a sub-package of Bevy called bevy-macro-utils (
https://crates.io/crates/bevy_macro_utils )
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079341
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Doc Ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079289
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Doc Ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076657
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743
--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík ---
*** Bug 2080744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080744
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076023
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075985
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075984
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Doc Ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075980
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066040
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994234
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
I don't know what happened, the pull request was closed as "Merged", but the
change does not show up in the master branch.
Maybe the developer accidentally force-pushed changes that overwrote your
change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993506
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073825
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra |needinfo?(iztok@iztok-jr-fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993294
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Upstream has released two new versions, could you update this to version 0.2.10
and refresh the spec with rust2rpm 21, if you're still interested in packaging
it?
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991164
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
The changes that are required to make this work well as a distro package don't
look too bad:
1) Patch the build.rs file according to these rules:
- remove all blocks that are gated behind #[cfg(not(feat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080744
Bug ID: 2080744
Summary: Review Request: rust-domain - DNS library for Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743
Bug ID: 2080743
Summary: Review Request: rust-domain - DNS library for Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068182
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@musicinmybrain.net
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080472
--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley ---
Oh, one more thing: it would be nice to package the README file by adding
> %doc README.md
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080472
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080472
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080706
Bug ID: 2080706
Summary: Review Request: greetd-gtkgreet - GTK based greeter
for greetd
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080701
Bug ID: 2080701
Summary: Review Request: bismuth - KDE Plasma extension that
lets you tile your windows automatically
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
54 matches
Mail list logo