https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092471
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Lopez ---
(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #1)
> I just tested and ExclusiveArch + ExcludeArch works fine. So before pushing
> slap a `ExcludeArch: %{ix86}` in there with a comment explaining why
Will do that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
Hison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericc6...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Hison
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
--- Comment #16 from Hison ---
Now it's important to think about exactly where you're going, so that everyone
was comfortable. For example, you can look here and read in detail
https://tripbirdie.com/guam-all-inclusive-resorts/ , I, for example
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087264
--- Comment #3 from Gustavo Costa ---
Hi Benson. Thanks for the unofficial review.
> 1) Perhaps change
> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/setfacl
> to
> BuildRequires: acl
> as setfacl is provided by https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/acl/acl/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091289
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b7d68aee70 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091290
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b7d68aee70 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091291
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b7d68aee70 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
--adv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036278
--- Comment #6 from W. Michael Petullo ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/44836
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093465
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mi...@olasagasti.info
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036278
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091310
--- Comment #1 from Benson Muite ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/python3-ufo2ft/fedora-36-x86_64/04500813-python-ufo2ft/python-ufo2ft.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092965
Cole Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|crobi...@redhat.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092965
Cole Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081109
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092471
Cole Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091389
--- Comment #4 from Benson Muite ---
Output of fedora-review
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091389
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite ---
Updated Spec and SRPM
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/uacme/fedora-36-x86_64/04500702-uacme/uacme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467
--- Comment #6 from Mark E. Fuller ---
I'll take the suggestion - Thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467
Arthur Bols changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467
--- Comment #4 from Mark E. Fuller ---
Fixed:
SPEC: https://fuller.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-task.spec
SRPM: https://fuller.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-task-3.12.1-1.fc36.src.rpm
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467
--- Comment #3 from Arthur Bols ---
Thank you for the changes!
Only a small issue left, the description is missing from the -doc and go-task
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091282
--- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley ---
> Will see if can package fontship.
There are still quite a few missing dependencies, including some challenging
ones. I’d like to think it might eventually be possible.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091282
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite ---
Thanks for information about the headers. Changes look good. Testing
functionality. Will see if can package fontship.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
://music.fedorapeople.org/20220605/sfnt2woff-zopfli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://music.fedorapeople.org/20220605/sfnt2woff-zopfli-1.3.1-1.fc36.src.rpm
> diff --git a/sfnt2woff-zopfli.spec b/sfnt2woff-zopfli.spec
> index 7fedb86..a713768 100644
> --- a/sfnt2woff-zopfli.spec
> +++ b/sfnt2woff-zopfli.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091282
--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley ---
Thank you for the preliminary review!
> Comments:
> 1) Seems good to me.
>
> 2) The url http://people.mozilla.org/~jkew/woff/ seems not to be available.
> Code seems to be available at
> https://web.archi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093585
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081109
--- Comment #4 from Mark E. Fuller ---
Sorry about that. Thanks for catching it
I reran the builds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/review-june-2022/build/4500640/
Build log here: https://fuller.fedorapeople.org/mopac-copr-build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091282
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite ---
6) Should header files be in a devel package? See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087264
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093674
--- Comment #1 from Jani Juhani Sinervo ---
*** Bug 2017870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017870
Jani Juhani Sinervo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093674
Bug ID: 2093674
Summary: Review Request: hsetroot - An imlib2-based wallpaper
composer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091282
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
33 matches
Mail list logo
