https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064302
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101999
--- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88871250
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101999
Bug ID: 2101999
Summary: Review Request: python-isoduration - Operations with
ISO 8601 durations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989943
--- Comment #6 from Ladar Levison ---
Just to be clear, Amirerfan, I take you are volunteering to be the package
maintainer?
And for completeness, the GH issue on packaging:
https://github.com/gyunaev/birdtray/issues/481
And the Plasma segf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989943
Ladar Levison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||la...@lavabit.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095974
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095974
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gotmax@e.email
--- Comment #1 from Maxwel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095005
--- Comment #3 from Maxwell G ---
> rpm -qp --qf="%{description}\n
> https://music.fedorapeople.org/python-rfc3339-validator-0.1.4-1.fc36.src.rpm";
This command is misformatted. It should be rpm -qp --qf="%{description}\n"
https://music.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095005
--- Comment #2 from Maxwell G ---
Here is a filled fedora-review template. Everything passes.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095005
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096448
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1f4e043f75 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057654
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/switchtec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064302
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-sebastian-type3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091668
--- Comment #21 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oddjob-gpupdate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935379
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openconnect-gateway
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484
--- Comment #17 from Carl George 🤠---
> I've added: `%{_datadir}` to the `%files` section to cover them.
This should be %{_datadir}/neomutt. Packages shouldn't duplicate directory
ownership with the filesystem package [0].
-%{_datadir}
+%{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Okay, as long as the main dune package contains only the dune binary, I can see
how that would work. When a new version of OCaml is released, for example, we
could build ocaml-csexp and ocaml-pp with the ol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
It compiles for me, and I'm running fedora-review now, but...
I wonder if -- because dune is a regular binary -- if we can just depend on
a non-specific version of dune so we don't have to do such in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjo...@redhat.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
Bug ID: 2101964
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pp - Pretty printing library for
OCaml
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the unofficial review, Benson. Here are my (not completely
satisfactory) answers to your questions.
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #2)
> - If (and only if) the source package includes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057654
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo switchtec 2057654
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45346
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099411
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
I've been super busy and am just now circling back around to this. I'm fine
with it either way. I guess one of should sign on as comaintainer for the
other, whichever package wins out. :-)
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> It appears you have linked a .spec file from an SRPM that was already
> mangled by rpmautospec. That's usually not a good idea for a package review,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
One easy way out is to drop back to 1.3.0 which is under Apache/MIT like most
Rust crates:
https://gitlab.com/pwoolcoc/pwd/-/commit/8375b41379c6f7b2a3b7a675d6b892b27faa44fd
But the move to 'publi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> It appears you have linked a .spec file from an SRPM that was already
> mangled by rpmautospec. That's usually not a good idea for a package review,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057654
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
--- Comment #2 from Yizheng Xie ---
(In reply to Yizheng Xie from comment #1)
> SPEC URL:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yizhengxie/rust-nu/fedora-
> rawhide-x86_64/04571475-rust-pwd/rust-pwd.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101581
Yizheng Xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101583
Yizheng Xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101582
Yizheng Xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101580
Yizheng Xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101584
Yizheng Xie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084529
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(sco...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064302
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks for the review!
SCL requests
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45338
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45339
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45340
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101825
Jan Rodák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101825
Bug ID: 2101825
Summary: Review Request: openscap-report -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101811
Bug ID: 2101811
Summary: Review Request: ghc-shell-monad - Shell monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064302
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4
/neomutt-test/fedora-36-x86_64/04570893-neomutt/neomutt-20220628-1.fc36.src.rpm
Note: This has been built against a development version of NeoMutt, which has
some bugs.
> We do still need to put the finishing touches on the documentation/license
> handling.
> %{make_install}
> +rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101769
Bug ID: 2101769
Summary: Review Request: pf-bb-config - PF BBDEV (baseband
device) Configuration Application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484
--- Comment #15 from Richard Russon ---
Hi Steve!
Thanks for your offer to help maintain the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484
--- Comment #14 from Richard Russon ---
Damn! Sorry, I missed the notification. I'm on it.
Since then, we've been shuffling files around.
We've dropped some old contrib cruft and moved all the non-doc files out of
/usr/share/doc/neomutt.
Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087119
Stephen Coady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918756
Stephen Coady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084529
Stephen Coady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087119
Bug 2087119 depends on bug 2084529, which changed state.
Bug 2084529 Summary: Review Request: python-flask-mod-auth-gssapi - A Flask
extention to make use of the authentication provided by the mod_auth_gssapi
extention of Apache's HTTPd.
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267
Iztok Fister Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084040
Iztok Fister Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083142
Iztok Fister Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
53 matches
Mail list logo
