https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098379
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098379
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d8b9b42632 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100567
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2f16004650 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098379
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d37b6ebc5e has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100567
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
Thank you! I will update ocaml-dune as soon as this package is built.
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #5)
> Rpmlint
> ---
> Cannot parse rpmlint output:
>
>
> Rpmlint (debuginfo)
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102767
Major Hayden 🤠 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Fedora Pagure
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102767
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If your application is a C or C++ application yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084228
--- Comment #16 from Justin M. Forbes ---
It is in the 5.18 kernel-tools for f36. It is not present for F35 because one
of the builddeps is too out of date. If those are updated, I am happy to add it
to the next build. It is also currently in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102859
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88926113
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102859
Bug ID: 2102859
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-git-billy-5 - The
missing interface filesystem abstraction for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102846
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88926035
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102857
Bug ID: 2102857
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-git-billy - The missing
interface filesystem abstraction for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102846
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
New Spec URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-git-gcfg.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-git-gcfg-1.5.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102846
Bug ID: 2102846
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-git-gcfg - Go-gcfg/gcfg
fork for usage in src-d/go-git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Sorry for the delay. Here it is without all the build-without-dune parts.
This means when you do a mass rebuild, you'll have to remove the dependency on
dune from ocaml-csexp and ocaml-pp when computing th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102767
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102388
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 ---
# Currently Delve only supports x86_64
%global golang_arches x86_64 aarch64
needs to be higher up in the spec. Macros define ExclusiveArch: just below
Version, so it needs to be above.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102091
Karolina Surma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100555
--- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
> > # The tests currently crash
>
> This shounds like a red flag to me. Do you know *why* they crash? Do the
> tests need to be run with root provileges?
> T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102767
Bug ID: 2102767
Summary: Review Request: python-azure-mgmt-subscription -
Microsoft Azure Subscription Management Client Library
for Python
Product: Fedora
Versi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097677
--- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Emmm ... -2
Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-MikroTik-API/perl-MikroTik-API.spec
SRPM URL:
http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-MikroTik-API/perl-MikroTik-API-2.0.1-2.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100555
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097677
--- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Thanks for the review and sorry, blissfully forgotten everything that I once
knew about perl packaging.
Updated spec in the same location.
Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-MikroTik-API/perl-MikroT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102388
--- Comment #10 from Alejandro Sáez Morollón ---
(In reply to Alejandro Sáez Morollón from comment #9)
> FYI: There's a problem with starlark, delve uses an old version of this and
> the newer version that we have in Fedora breaks tests.
> I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097677
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source0 addresses are Ok.
Source0 archive (SHA-512:
4357bdc590e2db5e65808d3289b000cd376a7b56a1fe22bb9f2d839e3321fb79edab1d0cadf0a2cebdd2b00a1348b1bfc1486f2734ceee920134c42158c31838)
is original. Ok.
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102693
Bug ID: 2102693
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-httpserver - HTTP server
for pytest
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097677
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989943
--- Comment #12 from Amirerfan Rafati ---
I am glad that @mark.e.ful...@gmx.de is volunteering to maintain this package,
because I probably cannot maintain it.
Also I do not have access to any Fedora system with Plasma installed right now
but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654664
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(xavier@bachelot.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Assignee|bruno.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212256
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsta...@redhat.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102106
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089243
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jama...@fc.up.pt
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100555
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099677
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099857
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|zbys...@in.waw.pl |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049698
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084228
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082032
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@sicherha.de
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053420
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@sicherha.de
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091372
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102388
--- Comment #9 from Alejandro Sáez Morollón ---
FYI: There's a problem with starlark, delve uses an old version of this and the
newer version that we have in Fedora breaks tests.
I'm working on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056244
--- Comment #5 from c...@supakeen.com ---
I'm going to follow the stalled review procedure here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#stalled which
means I'll reassign the ticket in a week :)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098379
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d8b9b42632 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d8b9b42632
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098379
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d37b6ebc5e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d37b6ebc5e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100567
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2f16004650 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2f16004650
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100567
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102280
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102388
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark.e.ful...@gmx.de
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
Yunying Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(yunying.sun@intel |
|.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102106
--- Comment #5 from Jaya ---
I tried a mock build as below and its failing at the end (looks like while
installing the artefacts):
# mock -r /etc/mock/fedora-37-x86_64.cfg --rebuild lucene-9.2.0-1.fc37.src.rpm
.
.
.
+ cp -pr NOTICE.txt
/build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
Tadej Janež changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(xiangquan.liu@int
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102546
--- Comment #1 from Gris Ge ---
Koji scratch build is
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=88911224
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102546
Bug ID: 2102546
Summary: Review Request: rust-mptcp-pm - Linux kernel MPTCP
path manager netlink Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089243
--- Comment #11 from José Matos ---
(In reply to kkula from comment #10)
> yes, you are right about build dep generation.
> I updated spec file by removing all BR's except python-devel.
Just a small followup: last week, on Monday, when I inte
61 matches
Mail list logo
