https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103418
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091389
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Blo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091310
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2056244
--- Comment #10 from c...@supakeen.com ---
Thank you Paul!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036288
--- Comment #13 from Radu Rendec ---
Thank you for the information and advice. Much appreciated!
To answer your question, I'm interested in both, but my priority is getting
this particular program packaged. Therefore, I'm going to take you up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105127
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484
--- Comment #21 from Richard Russon ---
> The spec file looks good now.
Great!
> the changelog entries going forward will need to ...
> ... use 20220629-1 instead of NeoMutt-20220629
OK, I've updated my template
> The historical entries ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105127
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---