https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
--- Comment #18 from Lyes Saadi ---
Thank you so much :D! This will indeed only package fonts-contrib! Andy Mender,
are you still up to review this? (Otherwise, I'll just ask for a review swap to
speed this up, since old packages rarely get re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
--- Comment #17 from Richard Fontana ---
FE-Legal block lifted. The assumption for now is that this is just a request to
package the figlet fonts in the fonts-standard directory. I actually don't
currently have an opinion on the fonts-contrib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
Richard Fontana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106138
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@lyes.eu
--- Comment #2 from Lyes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@lyes.eu
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110814
Bug ID: 2110814
Summary: Review Request: rs - Reshape a data array
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105873
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2110758
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110085
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus_names.spec
SRPM URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-zbus_names-2.2.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
Updated to version 2.2.0, which now ships a license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110082
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #15)
> What is next step ? You request the repo ? I do something ?
Could you please take the bugzilla (i.e. assign it to yourself), because my SCM
request was dropp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109250
Bug 2109250 depends on bug 2107915, which changed state.
Bug 2107915 Summary: Review Request: python-plac - The smartest command line
arguments parser in the world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086269
--- Comment #15 from Joshua Strobl ---
Hey Neal, any update on the review of this and my thoughts provided in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086269#c12 ? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088753
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gotmax@e.email) |
--- Comment #4 from Maxwell G ---
I'm d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109250
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-yte
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110001
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-reretry
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-plac
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109250
--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley ---
Thanks for the review! Repository requested:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45945
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109250
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107901
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110001
--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley ---
Thank you for the review!
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45944
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley ---
Thank you for the review!
Repository requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45943
Here is the rpmlint output. You have to run it manually with current
fedora-review.
===
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110001
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #12 from Ben Beasley ---
Thanks! I’ve skimmed your responses.
> We've addressed this for debian, too. Essentially the packaged version is too
> old for our requirements (5.1.3), which is not available on most
> distributions.
U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #11 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #10)
> 1) Using conditionals for distros other than Fedora or EPEL is forbidden in
> Fedora .spec files:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #8 from ha...@kit.edu ---
Hi There,
I'm the debian packager of oidc-agent and a colleague of the developer. I'm
replying inline to help getting this package done. I also wrote the initial
specfile.
Whatever I report as "i have don
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #9 from ha...@kit.edu ---
I also removed the dependency on libsodium-static
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075170
--- Comment #5 from Stephen Gallagher ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sgallagh/npm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04684591-npm/npm.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sgallagh/npm/fedora-ra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108034
--- Comment #3 from Roman Inflianskas ---
Thanks, Paul.
1. Now updates were pushed, so I've requested branches.
2. xfailed is intentional, see:
https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade/blob/28d3c0b287188512d7c7a7c225ff8dedf4a87ee1/tests/featur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049699
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094638
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445
--- Comment #15 from Alain V. ---
What is next step ? You request the repo ? I do something ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902
--- Comment #9 from Karolina Surma ---
Except for the doc issue, the package meets the Packaging Guidelines, it
installs, it is possible to use (I tested it with Sphinx 5 & python-myst-parser
0.18 on Rawhide), its metadata look correctly, requ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074401
Julien Rische changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jris...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110372
Bug ID: 2110372
Summary: Request for kernel modules for DLN2
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110001
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110108
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107915
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109250
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902
--- Comment #8 from Karolina Surma ---
> > - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
> > (~1MB) or number of files.
> > Note: Documentation size is 2088960 bytes in 61 files.
> > See: https://docs.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104932
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
44 matches
Mail list logo