https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
--- Comment #24 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Lyes Saadi from comment #22)
> Paul Howarth :
> Huh, that's very weird? I don't think this is blocking the review, since
> this does seem like more a bug or a missing dependency (which I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108034
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-25c885d89b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105872
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3e6a99a3da has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993292
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105874
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3e6a99a3da has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105873
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3e6a99a3da has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
Lyes Saadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wright ---
Package is APPROVED!
If you have a second to review one of my open reviews I'd greatly appreciate
it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110050
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
--- Comment #22 from Lyes Saadi ---
Paul Howarth :
Huh, that's very weird? I don't think this is blocking the review, since this
does seem like more a bug or a missing dependency (which I think is then
handled automatically?), but is there no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901306
--- Comment #6 from Göran Uddeborg ---
In case anyone would like to use these programs, I've made the package
available via copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/goeran/tlpi/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wright from comment #2)
> I think you need "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" so the icon directory
> structure retains proper package ownership.
Thanks! Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-thlib-timezone-local
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wright ---
I would also adjust the source to use variables wherever possible:
Source0:
https://download.gnome.org/sources/%{name}/1.0/%{name}-%{tarball_version}.tar.xz
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonat...@almalinux.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
--- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember ---
Fair enough. I guess in this case it's mainly an executable package then?
Upstream's naming (psautohint instead of python-psautohint) seems to hint that
this may be the case.
I'm pretty sure David is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111269
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111269
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111995
Bug ID: 2111995
Summary: Review Request: mingw-python-ply - MinGW Windows
Python ply library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111995
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
The scratch build above failed due to what looks like an intermittent parallel
build issue, should be easy to fix or work around if it shows up again (my
earlier scratch build went fine).
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
--- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #8)
> Oh, that's true, and it's actually installed as well, I think -- I totally
> missed it at first because the python library must be hidden behind %files
> -n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111978
Bug ID: 2111978
Summary: Review Request: libpanel - IDE paneling library for
GTK
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108034
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-25c885d89b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-25c885d89b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
--- Comment #21 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/for-review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04689787-secrets/secrets.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104123
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
--- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #6)
> (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #5)
> > I would simplify this a bit and call the package just 'psautohint' and not
> > python-psautohint because it's just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(amigadave@amigada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109069
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyvat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104123
Sergio Lopez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111672
--- Comment #3 from Major Hayden 鸞 ---
(In reply to Scott K Logan from comment #2)
> Thanks for the really fast review!
>
> I converted the package to use pyproject-rpm-macros:
> Spec URL:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
--- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #5)
> I would simplify this a bit and call the package just 'psautohint' and not
> python-psautohint because it's just an executable and not a python library.
> See
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040624
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klem...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079394
Ali Erdinc Koroglu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dc...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #19 from Ding-Yi Chen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #24 from Petr Vokac ---
> Even if you want to be the primary maintainer of this package, since Petr
> Vocak submitted this review request, Petr is the only one who could request
> the dist-git repository after a successful review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029547
--- Comment #20 from Paul Howarth ---
Still (see #2061745) fails to build on s390x:
s390x: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90173601
==
The Meson build system
Version: 0.62.2
Source dir:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110372
Markus Rathgeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maggu2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
44 matches
Mail list logo
