https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #10 from Parag Nemade ---
Fixed both the issues above discussed.
Just can someone confirm if installation of this dynamic buildrequires
python3-tox-current-env is really correct?
Spec URL:
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124142
Bug ID: 2124142
Summary: Review Request: vorta - A GUI for Borg Backup
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073765
--- Comment #2 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #1)
> So I would expect only something like amd64 and i386 to be OK.
> Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding the package?
> Sorry if I am missing something obvious.
T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122170
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-db97b93907 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-db97b93
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122170
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1817fae14b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a76837d282 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122170
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-588a605741 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f80dd4eaa3 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111607
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c0d3e99741 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051066
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f2c240a532 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111607
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3817cede8e has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111607
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b57304128b has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121751
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111607
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c30176f464 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111607
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
Sandro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1909545 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
Please also drop coverage[toml], as did upstream. See
https://github.com/hynek/hatch-fancy-pypi-readme/commit/6c06d7244183c5b71aed905c9950e3206e5f0a9e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #7 from Sandro ---
Created attachment 1909545
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1909545&action=edit
Remove unused dependency from pyproject.toml
With the attached patch included in the spec file you can drop all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124098
Bug ID: 2124098
Summary: Review Request: python-qt6 - Python bindings for Qt6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #5 from Sandro ---
One more (minor) thing I forgot to mention:
I would suggest using consistent naming in the BuildRequires. You added some
for running the tests. For consistency and better readability I would change
these to:
Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123950
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #4 from Sandro ---
(In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sandro from comment #2)
>
> Thank you for having a look at this package.
>
> > Issues:
> > ===
> > - If (and only if) the source package includes th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093674
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093674
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkadl...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091310
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124068
Bug ID: 2124068
Summary: Review Request: python-avro - Avro is a serialization
and RPC framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123618
--- Comment #3 from Parag Nemade ---
(In reply to Sandro from comment #2)
Thank you for having a look at this package.
> Issues:
> ===
> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then
29 matches
Mail list logo
