https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e78f68bc31 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e78f68bc31
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-2230657233 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2230657233
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-68c7e36176 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-68c7e36176
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-24bae9230c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-24bae9230c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109341
Paul Wouters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Pau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112474
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #35 from Maxwell G ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871171
--- Comment #38 from Joel Savitz ---
Ok, I believe I have fixed the remaining problems. I put the new spec and SRPM
in the same place.
I will send a self-introduction soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-furo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
FWIW, I like using setuptools_scm to control the contents of upstream tarball
builds rather than a manually-maintained MANIFEST.in, and I would think that
would let you include the file in the tarball wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Sun ---
The unwanted pylero cli file have already been removed as you suggested within
the %install in the cfg and it is still required to be added to the `%exclude`
to work.
The pylero.cfg is the user config sample
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
--- Comment #24 from Stefano Brivio ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #22)
> BTW you should avoid using macros in the %changelog: rpmbuild expands them!
>
> See for example https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20588
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954
--- Comment #5 from Sandro ---
Created attachment 1909951
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1909951&action=edit
original spec file
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #4)
> (In reply to Sandro from comment #2)
> > > Iss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079161
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079161
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkadl...@redhat.com
Doc Type|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043940
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d6be6ae092 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124244
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
As expected the build attempts to download stuff, and that doesn't end well:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91712209
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thank you for the review!
(In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #2)
> The package looks qite good to me. Except for the way we have to deal with
> JS bundling but this is a thing which won't change anyti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefa...@redhat.com
F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Bug ID: 2124697
Summary: Review Request: libblkio - Block device I/O library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119499
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102
--- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson ---
In general, when you get an error like that, you should ask "why is a file I
don't want getting installed?" and fix that, rather than just telling RPM to
ignore it. Why is the upstream install stuff inst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119499
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/SDL2_Pango
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and compo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119499
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Will do, thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102
--- Comment #3 from Wayne Sun ---
Without the `_unpackaged_files_terminate_build` set as 0, it will fail on
fedora > 36 (37 and rawhide) with:
Requires: /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) = 3.11 python3.11dist(click)
python3.11dist(suds)
Checking f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122024
Bug 2122024 depends on bug 2122023, which changed state.
Bug 2122023 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bwesterb-ristretto - Pure Go
implementation of the Ristretto prime-order group over Edwards25519
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118906
--- Comment #7 from Artem ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #5)
a) Why use 0.3 for Release instead of 1? See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/
Fedora maintainers recommend me this when submitti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
The package looks qite good to me. Except for the way we have to deal with JS
bundling but this is a thing which won't change anytime soon.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-55865abd9a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-55865abd9a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115102
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Sun ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #1)
> I'm not a sponsor so cannot do the official review, but a couple of
> unofficial notes:
>
> * I'd be concerned about `%define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087174
Ali Erdinc Koroglu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ali.erdinc.korogl |
|u...@intel.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vim-fugitive-gitlab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/erlang-rebar3-pc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124244
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122763
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Looks fine now, except for the licenses
You probably do want to go through the list of projects bundled and see what
the upstream licenses are
These are some (but not all) that I found:
$ find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3feea8d57d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3feea8d57d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d6be6ae092 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d6be6ae092
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-d6be6ae092 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d6be6ae092
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-434f6f9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043940
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124391
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112474
--- Comment #34 from John Snow ---
Sorry for the delay, just finished moving :)
v0.0.2 published upstream: https://pypi.org/project/qemu.qmp/
V5 spec: https://people.redhat.com/~jsnow/v5/python-qemu-qmp.spec
V5 SRPM:
https://people.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plasma-welcome-app
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124359
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rctree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122024
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-cloudflare-circl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120005
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-unsafe-libyaml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122023
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-bwesterb-ristretto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124244
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpv
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088753
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-docstring-parser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041266
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
--- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen ---
BTW you should avoid using macros in the %changelog: rpmbuild expands them!
See for example https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2058896
eg you could write instead %%set_build_flags or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074709
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyqt6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123950
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clibs-list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120129
--- Comment #6 from Alessandro Astone ---
(In reply to Maíra Canal from comment #5)
> (In reply to Alessandro Astone from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Maíra Canal from comment #3)
> > > Hi Alessandro,
> > >
> > > Just a few nitpicks on your s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8a734e1c9c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8a734e1c9c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123760
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123760
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from V
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546
Bug ID: 2124546
Summary: Review Request: duo_unix - Duo two-factor
authentication for UNIX systems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124546
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91699155
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
--- Comment #3 from Onuralp Sezer ---
All done
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/plasma-welcome-app/raw/master/f/plasma-welcome-app.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/plasma-welcome-app/raw/master/f/plasma-welcome-app-0-1.20220902git0163cda.fc38.sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> %description
> Plasma Welcome App
%description must end with a dot.
> Version:0.0.1+git.20220323.%{shortcommit}
Version must be 0 as there are no releases yet.
> Release:1%{dist}
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124356
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Sandro from comment #2)
> > Issues:
> > ===
> > - Dist tag is present.
>
> I've got no clue what that means.
I think this is related to rpmautospec. No change is required then if you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106611
--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124479
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843646
BrendaPerez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janethil...@outlook.com
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107600
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jva...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #5)
> Do you understand the "beam-was-not-recompiled" warnings from rpmlint? I'm
> not conversant enough with erlang to know what that means.
Yeah that's a known is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124479
--- Comment #1 from serge_sans_paille ---
bolt has been part of LLVM since LLVM 14, it's packaging is made a bit
difficult by its dependency on private headers...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124479
Bug ID: 2124479
Summary: Review Request: llvm-bolt - a post-link optimizer
developed to speed up large applications
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103073
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/praiskup/vim-fugitive-gitlab/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04811885-vim-fugitive-gitlab/vim-fugitive-gitlab.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124361
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
Done: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/28966
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124326
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
Thank you! I've requested unretirement in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11013
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124329
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
I'm in no hurry at all. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124359
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember ---
Thanks for the review! Sure, will do as soon as the repo is created.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116845
Felix Kolwa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fko...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124142
--- Comment #2 from Justin Zobel ---
Haha damn. I have been meaning to add it to Fedora repo for a few months now
and just got around to the review request. Thanks for the time and I'll get in
contact with jonathanspw.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124142
Timothée Floure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
Resolution|---
99 matches
Mail list logo
