https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117384
--- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen ---
Thanks for the review Jonathan, think you need to sync some email addresses -
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/52213
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #7 from Benson Muite ---
Source URL in spec file still has a dollar sign which should be a percent sign:
https://github.com/namhyung/%{name}/archive/v${version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
should be
https://github.com/namhyung/%{name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177572
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-FLATPAK-2023-06cc4e071f has been pushed to the Fedora 37 Flatpaks stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail b
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
proletarius...@protonmail.com has canceled Package Review
's request for
proletarius...@protonmail.com's needinfo:
Bug 1881803: Review Request: golang-github-emersion-vcard - A Go library to
parse and format vCard.
https://bugzilla.red
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
proletarius...@protonmail.com has canceled Package Review
's request for
proletarius...@protonmail.com's needinfo:
Bug 1881804: Review Request: golang-github-emersion-webdav - A Go library for
WebDAV, CalDAV and CardDAV.
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176170
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-5280183775 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #15 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176171
Bug 2176171 depends on bug 2176170, which changed state.
Bug 2176170 Summary: Review Request: R-docopt - Command-Line Interface
Specification Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176170
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176170
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5701981
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2180989-uftrace/fedora-rawhid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953285
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953285&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5695859 to 5701981
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #4 from Bernhard Kaindl ---
@ Benson Muite: Updated the spec file accordingly:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bkaindl/uftrace/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/05699129-uftrace/uftrace.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175818
--- Comment #32 from Brian J. Murrell ---
I do have a COPR project building this for F37->rawhide if anyone wants early
access on current-release Fedora.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/brianjmurrell/input-leap/
dnf copr enable brian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150511
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/ka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150511
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ---
OK, rust-mutate_once is now imported, which unblocks this. Upstream has nicely
added a LICENSE file in the mean time so I've gone ahead and copied it
downstream as well.
* Thu Mar 23 2023 Kalev Lember - 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150511
Bug 2150511 depends on bug 2150509, which changed state.
Bug 2150509 Summary: Review Request: rust-mutate_once - Interior mutability,
write-once and borrowable as plain &T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
What|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181376
Bug ID: 2181376
Summary: Review Request: chatgpt-gui - ChatGPT-GUI is an
application written using Qt for Python that allows
you to easily talk to Assistant, the AI based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-mutate_once
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181036
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
> The README links to the img file, should I flag it as documentation instead
> of removing it to avoid a broken reference?
That's an option. However, there is zero places where users would actually se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
Oh, that link is super helpful, thanks! I think I agree with your
interpretation. Let me try to get in touch with upstream first before adding
the license text downstream.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/mu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #29 from Steve Cossette ---
One last update updated the Source1 in the spec to point to the temporary
url for the replacement config (That'll be modified later once I have the
distgit).
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #28 from Steve Cossette ---
I submitted a PR to KDE to fix the issue with kauth (The source of the dbus
config problem). For now, after talking with the KDE sig and checking Fedora's
best practices on the subject, I added a source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
* Thu Mar 23 2023 Kalev Lember - 0.1.1-2
- Add missing LICENSE file from upstream
Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-mutate_once.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-mutate_once-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Yes, you can include the upstream license text as a separate source and include
it in the package manually until upstream publishes a new release, i.e.
something like
Source1: https://github.com/kamadak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
No problem, I was just going through review tickets I'm associated with and
updated them all (and made sure none of them were waiting for *me*!)
If I understand correctly, yes, including a copy of the l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150509
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(klem...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(klem...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117384
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|nee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117384
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jonathan@almalinu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117384
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953234
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953234&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5622425 to 5701107
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117384
--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen ---
%doc line corrected.
Spec URL:
https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-influxdb-client/python-influxdb-client.spec
SRPM URL:
https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-influxdb-client/python-influxdb-client-1.36.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/indigo-d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #35 from Steve Traylen ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #34 from Steve Traylen ---
Sorry no its these:
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent-4.3.2-1.el7.src.rpm
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent.spec-4.3.2-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #33 from Steve Traylen ---
Just looked into packaging this for Fedora and then found this - good.
Are these still the review candidates for Fedora:
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent.spec-4.1.1-3
https://vokac.fedorapeopl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #47 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5700735
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1942132-intel-media-driver-f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953231
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953231&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5700638 to 5700735
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #27 from Steve Cossette ---
This is with the latest git of rpmlint:
Rpmlint
---
Checking: kde-inotify-survey-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
kde-inotify-survey-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
kde-inotify-survey-d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #26 from Steve Cossette ---
Okay, so it still shows on the latest release of rpmlint, but I installed the
latest git version and the error seemed to be gone for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5700741
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2173178-kde-inotify-survey/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #24 from Steve Cossette ---
Yeah I went ahead and added it in the spec. Though for now I set it as "*"
because I honestly have no idea where it needs to be allowed to send to, but
that gets rid of the lint error. I updated the spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #45 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5700638
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1942132-intel-media-driver-f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #44 from František Zatloukal ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/intel-media-driver-free/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05700646-intel-media-driver-free/intel-media-driver-free.spec
SRPM:
https://downloa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #23 from Benson Muite ---
A number of Deepin desktop packages have send_interface in their conf files.
For KDE,
some that do are:
org.kde.kpmcore.helperinterface.conf:
send_interface="org.kde.kpmcore.externalcommand"/>
or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #22 from Steve Cossette ---
I went ahead and uploaded an updated version of the spec with the licensing
breakdown. I'm trying to see about building the latest rpmlint to see what
happens of this error.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #43 from František Zatloukal ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/intel-media-driver-free/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05698894-intel-media-driver-free/intel-media-driver-free.spec
SRPM:
https://downloa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #21 from Benson Muite ---
Thanks for the updates. Can you add a license breakdown in the spec file, see:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/%40fedora-review/fedora-review-2173178-kde-inotify-survey/fedora-rawhide-x8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179633
--- Comment #3 from Yadav Lamichhane ---
Hi Blinxen,
Thank you for your input on this. I will follow all the links you have shared
and try to implement them accordingly.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #20 from Steve Cossette ---
Let me know what you'd like to do in this matter. This specific error occurs on
many kde packages. I've been talking with the kde sig alot, and we're unsure
that's a real issue, as I tested the package (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181036
--- Comment #4 from fedora@gmail.com ---
And similarly, it looks like many of the crates include coverage files. Should
they all be patched?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181036
--- Comment #3 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The README links to the img file, should I flag it as documentation instead of
removing it to avoid a broken reference?
A few of these crates include CODEOWNERS, should they all be patched to exclud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #3)
> It looks like this was done already, but it wasn't published to crates.io:
> https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/versionize_derive/commit/
> 55fccd6001946c47
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
--- Comment #3 from fedora@gmail.com ---
It looks like this was done already, but it wasn't published to crates.io:
https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/versionize_derive/commit/55fccd6001946c47185d0d05b19fef11779ce543
The crate seems to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
Yes, if this crate is only needed to run some tests, dropping it and the tests
that require it would be another valid option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #5 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The actual use of this crate just seems to be for running tests on aarch64, so
another option could be to skip the tests and drop it if that's easier. I can
try a PR first, though.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5698868
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2173178-kde-inotify-survey/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953194
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953194&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5564269 to 5698868
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #17 from Benson Muite ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181036
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Oh, sorry, I missed that you already filed a ticket. The COPR build service is
nice, but it sure adds noise to these tickets ...
If the upstream project doesn't respond, please file a PR to include the
l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
This is unfortunate, but it doesn't absolve us from abiding by the projects
(intended?) license terms.
Since the project looks abandoned, the "best effort" solution that would let us
move forward is pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #16 from Steve Cossette ---
Updated the spec and source:
2) I updated the spec to use the .tar.gz error. It should dodge the .tar.zst
error (No idea why that even showed, but there's a way to avoid it, so)
1) I added the requ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #3 from fedora@gmail.com ---
I noted in the original comment that the project hasn't been active for five
years. Is it enough to just submit a bug about the license? Should the SRPM
add the MIT license file itself if upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
--- Comment #3 from fedora@gmail.com ---
Do you want me to edit the issue linked in the original comment to indicate
that it is a requirement?
Yes, the 0.13 branch is used specifically:
https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker/bl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180843
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-assert-str
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180614
Richard Fontana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rfontana@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2181030
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180843
Paul Whalen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2181030
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181030
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181029
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180843
Paul Whalen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwha...@redhat.com
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181028
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181029
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2181028
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181025
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181023
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2141389
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181023
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Fla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #42 from Neal Gompa ---
Also a new version just came out, can you update to that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
Doc Ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132
--- Comment #41 from Neal Gompa ---
> -DMPEG2_Decode_Supported="no" \
You can turn MPEG2 on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mikel@olasagasti.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
Steve Cossette changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174145
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180614
marcd...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rfontana@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite ---
Is it possible to use upstream url:
https://github.com/namhyung/uftrace
In the source spec file use:
Source:
https://github.com/bernhardkaindl/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #15 from Benson Muite ---
Sorry, there is a signed zst file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #14 from Benson Muite ---
Releases do not seem to have zst file:
https://invent.kde.org/system/kde-inotify-survey/-/releases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
--- Comment #13 from Benson Muite ---
Further issues from fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c):
1)
Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1,
/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kf5/kded,
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
