https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181978
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181978
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Suggestions:
1) Always use any "install" or "cp" commands as "install -p" or "cp -p" to
preserve the timestamp.
2) the package google-noto-sans-cjk-subset-fonts-all is not installable.
Looks like either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181978
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Parag A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #25 from Felix Wang ---
Update: I suggest put the bash-completion file into
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions and most packages put them into here,
though I find fzf package put it into /etc/bash_completion.d directory.
ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1954073
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954073&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5711034 to 5715604
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5715604
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2177363-bcunit/fedora-rawhid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
--- Comment #11 from Phil Wyett ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #7)
> Thanks for the updates.
> Can you enable tests?
> No need to package binary examples (though may build and possibly run them
> as smoke tests):
> bcunit-devel.x86
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
--- Comment #10 from Phil Wyett ---
Trigger new Copr build with updated package.
Spec URL:
https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fedora/rawhide/for_review/bcunit/bcunit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181029
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-39a28215e1 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-39a28215e1
See also h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181029
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-77e17cf235 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
--- Comment #9 from Phil Wyett ---
(In reply to Felix Wang from comment #8)
> > Recommends: %{name}-doc = %{version}
>
> The -doc subpackage does not exist in the spec file
Thanks. Removed for next upload.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #50 from Yunying Sun ---
The path for sharing the processed tarball(Source0 in spec) has changed, so I
updated the spec again to use the right one:
Source0:
https://download.01.org/intel-sgx/sgx_repo/rpm_onespec/%{name}-%{version}.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177363
Felix Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||topa...@outlook.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179444
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-dd2e030312 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179201
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-dd2e030312 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
Felix Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||topa...@outlook.com
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179444
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
No, the license of the upstream code must be reflected in the Fedora package:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_basic_policy
In particular:
"The spec file License: field consist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #7 from fedora@gmail.com ---
I added comments and dropped docs in the spec and SRPM.
Would it be possible to just declare the package as Apache-2.0, since the BSD
license is only for some dual-licensed files? Otherwise, I gues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181030
--- Comment #3 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The SRPM was updated to build with the new crc64 package for testing it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181025
--- Comment #5 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The spec and SRPM are updated to exclude docs and add comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181023
--- Comment #5 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The spec and SRPM are updated to exclude docs and add comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
--- Comment #8 from fedora@gmail.com ---
I tested it on a PowerPC G4 system, and it looks like updating to 2.0.0 fixes
the failures. I've proposed it upstream here:
https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/versionize/pull/54
If they agree t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180426
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181025
Bug 2181025 depends on bug 2118751, which changed state.
Bug 2118751 Summary: rust-vm-memory-0.10.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118751
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181023
Bug 2181023 depends on bug 2141389, which changed state.
Bug 2141389 Summary: rust-vmm-sys-util-0.11.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141389
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
Bug 2181038 depends on bug 2141389, which changed state.
Bug 2141389 Summary: rust-vmm-sys-util-0.11.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141389
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182207
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/SpiderLa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182207
Bug ID: 2182207
Summary: Review Request: nginx-mod-modsecurity - ModSecurity v3
nginx connector
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181686
--- Comment #5 from Derek ---
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #2)
>
> Comments reading through the .spec file and source:
>
> 1. Requires: python3-jwt >= 1.6.1
>Requires: python3-cryptography
>
> These are not needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #11 from Jeff Layton ---
The "could not download source" warning is expected at this time. We're going
to want to package v0.8 as the first release, but its tarball is not cut yet.
Once v0.8 is cut we'll update to that version. Thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5714485
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2182151-ktls-utils/fedora-ra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Layton ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5714477
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2182151-ktls-utils/srpm-builds/0571447
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #7 from Jeff Layton ---
The build check seems to be picking up some cached version of the SRPM. Putting
a copy at a new URL:
Spec URL: https://jlayton.fedorapeople.org/ktls-utils/0.7.1/ktls-utils.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jlayton.fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #5)
> The files under the directory get marked as documentation, but I can change
> it.
Ah, then it works, but it still doesn't make sense for Rust -devel packages :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5714338
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2182151-ktls-utils/fedora-rawhide-x86_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Layton ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182165
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://tuba.geopjr.dev/
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5714318
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2182151-ktls-utils/fedora-rawhide-x86_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
Jeff Layton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chuck.le...@oracle.com
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Layton ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182165
Bug ID: 2182165
Summary: Review Request: tuba - Masondon GTK client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #5 from fedora@gmail.com ---
The files under the directory get marked as documentation, but I can change it.
I notified upstream at the link in the first comment. Should I add the BSD
license text to the SRPM directly?
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/oracle/k
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
Bug ID: 2182151
Summary: Review Request: ktls-utils - TLS Handshake agent for
kernel sockets
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
--- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini ---
Meh, the *one* crate where I think "it's a checksum calculator, what can go
wrong, no need to run a scratch build" fails on big-endian arches ...
If the package does not work at all on big-endian archit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181023
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Comments from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181025#c4 also apply
equally to this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
--- Comment #6 from fedora@gmail.com ---
This seems to be failing tests on s390x.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/7825/99197825/build.log
The failing test is the function to check if the algorithm works at all.
Should I ski
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini ---
Ah, that's true ... this situation just leads to code that's "unreachable" by
the compiler:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
#[cfg(not(test))]
fn test() {}
}
It's a bit of a hack though :)
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa ---
For the ctl subpackage
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
Is this actually true? Or can it be installed to control a remote hirte agent?
> - Adjust Source0 to point to /archive/hirte-/hirte-.tar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181025
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
1. Please also add the "/doc/" directory to the list of excluded files instead
of marking it as %doc.
We don't ship any documentation for Rust packages (we also don't run rustdoc,
for example), since th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
--- Comment #12 from Davide Cavalca ---
Other issues from a quick review:
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
fedora@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181039
Bug 2181039 depends on bug 2181020, which changed state.
Bug 2181020 Summary: Review Request: rust-cargo_toml - Cargo.toml struct
definitions for parsing with Serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dav...@cavalca.name
--- Comment #10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181039
Bug 2181039 depends on bug 2181022, which changed state.
Bug 2181022 Summary: Review Request: rust-device_tree - Reads and parses Linux
device tree images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
fedora@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|ASSIGN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
--- Comment #11 from Davide Cavalca ---
Created attachment 1953970
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953970&action=edit
licensecheck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181030
Bug 2181030 depends on bug 2181033, which changed state.
Bug 2181033 Summary: Review Request: rust-versionize_derive - Implements the
Versionize derive proc macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181039
Bug 2181039 depends on bug 2181033, which changed state.
Bug 2181033 Summary: Review Request: rust-versionize_derive - Implements the
Versionize derive proc macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks! One minor problem and one bigger problem remain:
1. I'm not sure if marking directories as %doc even works ...
I would replace this: "%doc %{crate_instdir}/images" with this: "%doc
%{crate_instd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5712616
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-raw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953968
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953968&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5541387 to 5712616
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-versionize_derive
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181022
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
This is not doing what you think it is:
`#[cfg(not(test))]`
This means "include this code only if we're not building tests" (i.e. the code
will not end up in test binaries, but in the actual library).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181020
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
The easiest solution for skipping a file with integration tests is:
$ rm src/firecracker/tests/verify_dependencies.rs
Otherwise, that looks good to me. Feel free to close this ticket as
CLOSED/NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181956
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181028
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-crc64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181028
--- Comment #4 from fedora@gmail.com ---
Sorry, I missed that by only building for Firecracker's supported platforms
(x86_64 and aarch64). The spec and SRPM are updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
Carl George 🤠 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@redhat.com
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181039
Bug 2181039 depends on bug 2181038, which changed state.
Bug 2181038 Summary: Review Request: rust-vm-superio - Emulation for legacy
devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
What|Removed |Ad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181021
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #29 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #28)
> > %{_mandir}/man1/hirtectl.*
>
> Still in agent package and ctl package. :)
Err, main package and ctl package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #28 from Neal Gompa ---
> %{_mandir}/man1/hirtectl.*
Still in agent package and ctl package. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953961
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953961&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5712539 to 5712589
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5712589
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2180450-hirte/fedora-rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181028
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-vm-superio
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #25 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
Spec URL: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/hirte.spec
SRPM URL: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/hirte-0.1.1-2.fc39.src.rpm
Adjusted for the cli in hirte and fixed the built issue from 0.1.1-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #24 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
>> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> Is this actually true? Or can it be installed to control a remote hirte agent?
The CLI talks locally to hirte, so yeah, they need to be both on the sam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #22 from Bernhard Kaindl ---
@ Benson Muite: Sorry for the grammar errors in my long comment: My web browser
started to misbehave and I didn't want to risk losing the full comment, which
is why I sumbmitted the comment in an unfini
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953959
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953959&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5688020 to 5712547
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5712547
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2168112-phpunit10/fedora-rawhide-x86_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181029
--- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #3)
> I've updated this package to re-enable tests by default and skip the broken
> one and to replace the patch with the automatic format.
Great, looks good to me.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168112
--- Comment #27 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 10.0.19
Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/phpunit10.git/plain/phpunit10.spec?id=fd5c418c10739383973fb1cc35c4ec00ab0ec742
SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/phpunit1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181038
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa ---
Also, hirtectl is included in the agent package too. You should probably remove
it from there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180989
--- Comment #21 from Bernhard Kaindl ---
Thanks for the review. About the output from fedora-review:
> uftrace.x86_64: E: shared-library-without-dependency-information
> /usr/lib64/uftrace/libmcount-nop.so
> $ rpmlint -e shared-library-with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Created attachment 1953958
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1953958&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5690816 to 5712539
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5712539
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2180450-hirte/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180450
--- Comment #19 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
Spec URL: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/hirte.spec
SRPM URL: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/hirte-0.1.1-1.fc39.src.rpm
- Update to 0.1.1
- Adjust Source0 to point to /archive/hirte-/hirt
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
