https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075108
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |
|om)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Jens Petersen has canceled Package Review
's request for Jens Petersen
's needinfo:
Bug 2075108: Review Request: ghc-linear - Linear Algebra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075108
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587978
--- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7e1332650e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188736
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5853700
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188736
--- Comment #5 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/convertall.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/convertall-0.8.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: With ConvertAll, you can combine the units any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188736
--- Comment #4 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3)
> Comments:
> a) Can python shebang macro
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_interpreter_invocation
> %py3_shebang_fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5853204
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5853194
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
--- Comment #13 from Sandro Mani ---
Spec URL:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas.spec
SRPM URL:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas-44.0-3.fc39.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
--- Comment #12 from Sandro Mani ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039
--- Comment #2 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
> - Package does not use a name that already exists.
> Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tepl
This is for an unretirement.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gitlab.gnome.org/sw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2180562
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039
Bug ID: 2190039
Summary: Review Request: tepl - Text editor product line
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186547
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186546
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189641
--- Comment #5 from Maverick Kaung ---
(In reply to Pavel Solovev from comment #4)
> Ah, and the last thing - on import, remove the `-f` flag from %gometa,
> gobuster is still
> built for i386.
Will do. Thanks for the review.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189641
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Solovev ---
Ah, and the last thing - on import, remove the `-f` flag from %gometa, gobuster
is still
built for i386.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/er
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960185
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960185=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5848169 to 5852553
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5852553
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189641
Pavel Solovev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182151
--- Comment #32 from Jeff Layton ---
Chuck took in the patch to fix the cipher selection to use local preferences.
I've updated the package to what is effectively a 0.9 release candidate, so
that should address another "Fix" :
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985
Bug ID: 2189985
Summary: Review Request: rust-erdtree - Cross-platform
multi-threaded filesystem and disk usage analysis tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189641
Pavel Solovev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189641
--- Comment #2 from Maverick Kaung ---
(In reply to Pavel Solovev from comment #1)
> > golang-github-pin-tftp.spec
> The filename of spec MUST match the name of the package. Rename to
> golang-github-pin-tftp-3.spec
Done. See new build link
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5852236
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960151
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960151=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5679168 to 5852236
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #16 from David Duncan ---
just adding my 2-cents to the move. This looks great and works with the new
method that the upstream project put together. We would have needed a new
review. If you would like a co-maintainer, I am happy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404
--- Comment #6 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu ---
Thanks for the comment Petr
SPEC Url:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/oneapi/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05852072-openvkl/openvkl.spec
SRPM Url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5852118
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960150
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960150=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5851296 to 5852118
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130734
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #13 from Nikola Forró ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05852030-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178256
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #11)
> > Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
>
> Hm, can I use dynamic version here?
>
> Obsoletes: awscli-2 < %{version}-%{release}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #11 from Nikola Forró ---
> Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
Hm, can I use dynamic version here?
Obsoletes: awscli-2 < %{version}-%{release}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa ---
> # provide an upgrade path from awscli-2 (Amazon Linux)
> Provides: awscli-2 = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes is needed here too, otherwise it's not an upgrade path.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5851296
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1960074
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1960074=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5847629 to 5851296
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
--- Comment #16 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu ---
Thank you Miro good catch, could you please try this
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-d9f453c43d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189420
--- Comment #7 from Nikola Forró ---
Ok, I've added a provide.
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/awscli2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05851145-awscli2/awscli2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137117
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|36 |rawhide
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
Ali Erdinc Koroglu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1959986
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1959986=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 5521704 to 5850867
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5850867
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/x86-simd-sort
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176934
--- Comment #13 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu ---
Sure I'll do that, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357
--- Comment #3 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu ---
Hello again, thank you for the comments
SPEC url:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05850854-stats-collect/stats-collect.spec
SRPM url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186902
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
53 matches
Mail list logo