https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149953
--- Comment #16 from Alessio ---
New build!
Spec URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/rustrpm/rust-cfonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/rustrpm/rust-cfonts-1.1.2-1.fc39.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223901
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9d8f798760 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208250
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8450c927fc has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8450c92
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224720
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-6dd210335e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224725
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-68d851c8f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225225
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-e964e244fd has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232042
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-118c2c8a66 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217273
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-fb09971da5 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224846
Bug 2224846 depends on bug 2224725, which changed state.
Bug 2224725 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lestrrat-iter - Iterator
tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224725
What|Removed |Adde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224846
Bug 2224846 depends on bug 2224720, which changed state.
Bug 2224720 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-lestrrat-httpcc - HTTP/1.1
Cache-Control Header Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224720
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224720
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225225
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217273
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9978fba777 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232042
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-efd5d8a6fa has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225254
Bug 2225254 depends on bug 2225225, which changed state.
Bug 2225225 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-sacloud-packages - Packages
à usage général pour SAKURA Cloud API Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225225
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217273
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1ac6a6d6ae has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234621
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107910
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107910
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107910
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tiosmod
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235018
Bug ID: 2235018
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-caarlos0-clone-org -
Clone all the repos of a GitHub organization
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235018
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105312913
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
Steve Cossette changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
Steve Cossette changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Gitlab
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
--- Comment #6 from Steve Cossette ---
Good to know! I'll keep an eye on this!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
--- Comment #5 from Tim Semeijn ---
The license has been approved but combines two clauses so it needs to be
submitted to SPDX as a new license. I will work on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1985324
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1985324&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6343056 to 6344304
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #15 from Zephyr Lykos ---
Sorry for the confusion. This should be up to date now:
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/mochaa-rpms/libsv/raw/c743be73f77b2318baad52c5b037367e36d13980/f/libsv.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfrac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232782
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1985323
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1985323&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6317265 to 6344290
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232782
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6344290
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2232782-python-onigu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232782
--- Comment #4 from Maxwell G ---
Spec URL:
https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-onigurumacffi/python-onigurumacffi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gotmax23.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-onigurumacffi/python-onigurumacffi-1.2.0-1.fc38.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232782
--- Comment #3 from Maxwell G ---
Thanks for the review, Benson!
> Unversioned so-files
This is okay. That .so is a Python extension module, not a standard shared
library.
> a) Unresolved symbols are in libpython3.11.so which seems not to b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #14 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
Well I can't see it, neither in the linked spec nor when going to your COPR and
extracting the .spec from the latest build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #13 from Zephyr Lykos ---
(In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #12)
> > %files
> > %license UNLICENSE
> > %doc README.md
> > %{_libdir}/libsv.so.1.0.0
> >
> > %files devel
> > %{_includedir}/sv/
> > %{_libdir}/libsv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107910
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #12 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
> %files
> %license UNLICENSE
> %doc README.md
> %{_libdir}/libsv.so.1.0.0
>
> %files devel
> %{_includedir}/sv/
> %{_libdir}/libsv.so.1
> %{_libdir}/libsv.so
> %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libsv.pc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
--- Comment #11 from Zephyr Lykos ---
This ticket is ready for approval. Further reviews required.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221908
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|2221908 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234867
Bug ID: 2234867
Summary: Review Request: optee_os - OP-TEE firmware for
various ARMv8-A SoCs.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217273
Christian Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227804
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6343726
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2227804-libxeddsa/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227804
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1985293
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1985293&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6235898 to 6343726
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
--- Comment #4 from Tim Semeijn ---
Hello Steve,
Thanks for sharing your intention to be willing to help by becoming a sponsor
on this package, much appreciated!
The license seems to be BSD-4-Clause with some additions. I created a new issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227804
--- Comment #10 from Matthieu Saulnier ---
Thank you for your help :)
Here is the new release.
Spec URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/libxeddsa.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/libxeddsa-2.0.0-4%5e20230824git1140086.fc38.src
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208250
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8450c927fc has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8450c927fc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233787
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #6)
> Makes sense. Let me do an upstream PR and see how it goes.
PR opened: https://github.com/aldanor/qoi-rust/pull/7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232783
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234761
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234760
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/en
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234760
Bug ID: 2234760
Summary: Review Request: rust-enumn - Convert number to enum
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234761
Bug ID: 2234761
Summary: Review Request: rust-four-cc - Newtype wrapper
providing a convenient representation of
four-character-code values
Product: Fedora
Versi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libmms
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
--- Comment #3 from Steve Cossette ---
You can find the Fedora allowed licenses here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
That license is not specifically allowed or denied, it just seems like a custom
variation. It j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228155
Steve Cossette changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||farch...@gmail.com
Doc Type|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223901
--- Comment #11 from Benson Muite ---
Thanks. Updated formatting. Bug will close automatically once imported into
Fedora 38/37.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232743
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232782
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 1985266
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1985266&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6304903 to 6343297
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6343297
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2229170-libmms/fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223901
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-9d8f798760 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9d8f798760
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229170
--- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libmms/libmms.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libmms/libmms-0.6.4-24.fc38.src.rpm
* Fri Aug 25 2023 Dominik Mierze
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173758
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel mod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
68 matches
Mail list logo
