https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254883
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2007881
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2007881&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6765362 to 6875367
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254883
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254883
--- Comment #5 from Albert Larsan ---
Spec URL:
https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core.spec
SRPM URL:
https://albertlarsan68.fedorapeople.org/packages/rust-fend-core/rust-fend-core-1.4.1-1.fc40.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238154
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6874216
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2231252-yass/fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2007868
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2007868&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6874118 to 6874216
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #55 from Keyue Hu ---
The source tarball is generated locally (some patch upstreamed but not
available in tag release)
> sha256 cc0e1c6b480b2a4b045285762cfd324297c24550d7f9f15d42f47540d280f31b
> https://github.com/Chilledheart/co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6874118
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2231252-yass/fedora-rawhide-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #53 from Keyue Hu ---
Spec URL: https://wa.letshack.info/yass.spec
SRPM URL: https://wa.letshack.info/yass-1.5.14-2.fc38.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6874104
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2231252-yass/srpm-builds/068
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231252
--- Comment #51 from Keyue Hu ---
There are some several changes since 1.4.7 release such as removal of xxhash,
http-parser and the introducing the tcmalloc dependency.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/Chilledheart/copr-yass/releases/download/1.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-494a8985f9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-494a8985f9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021751
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021751
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dav...@cavalca.na |
|me)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138487
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-64cd168f57 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-64cd168f57
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229349
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e617481013 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e617481013
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138487
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-2e1c103e0c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-2e1c103e0c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223011
Bug 2223011 depends on bug 2223010, which changed state.
Bug 2223010 Summary: Review Request: python-inquirer - Collection of common
interactive command line user interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138487
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138487
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223010
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-inquirer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138487
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-xdfile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Davide Cavalca has canceled Package Review
's request for Benson Muite
's needinfo:
Bug 2121870: Review Request: tsocks - Library for catching network connections,
redirecting them on a SOCKS server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121870
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Flags|needinfo?(be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159052
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dav...@cavalca.na |
|me)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Davide Cavalca has canceled Package Review
's request for Davide Cavalca
's needinfo:
Bug 2159052: Review Request: TE2PE - Primitive TE to PE32 converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159052
--- Comment #3 from Davide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990223
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6873909
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-1990223-python-certauth/srpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990223
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dav...@cavalca.na |
|me)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257186
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-b57906a84a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b57906a84a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211190
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-840cf08157 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257024
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-16a9ae4035 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257062
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-16a9ae4035 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257063
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-16a9ae4035 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247275
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-42ba2c9f2c has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257189
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257189
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3be808720f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3be808720f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247275
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-6f3e9c8768 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257024
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211172
Bug 2211172 depends on bug 2211190, which changed state.
Bug 2211190 Summary: Review Request: rust-dtparse - Dateutil-compatible
timestamp parser for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211190
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211180
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-899954a1f9 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244318
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-989afa382a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3b94820c3b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257189
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-reference-counted-singleton
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257189
--- Comment #7 from Michel Lind ---
Ah, I'll keep it for now since it doesn't matter anyway, and upstream will
hopefully accept the PR soon with or without changes. thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257186
--- Comment #3 from Michel Lind ---
Thank you! confirmed that after dropping the static feature (in rust2rpm.toml)
I can still build rust-selinux against it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257186
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-selinux-sys
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256995
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257307
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257307
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name
CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254883
--- Comment #4 from Michel Lind ---
Yes please - if there's no reason you need the old version, do update with the
latest. If it had been just a patch release I'd review now and ask you to
update before importing, but since it's a minor releas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254665
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5f125688c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254656
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5f125688c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254657
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5f125688c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254660
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5f125688c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254460
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b5f125688c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3b94820c3b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3b94820c3b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/host-spawn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254392
kb1000 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(kaeptmblaubaer100 |
|0...@gmail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
--- Comment #11 from Sergio Basto ---
# autosetup doesn't work with 2 sources
# https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1204
and why not support epel 8 and epel 7 ?
I'm fixing the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||ruff-0.1.11-1.fc40
Resolution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Solovev ---
- [x] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the
distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic
names)
- [x] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Pavel Solovev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/host-spawn.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/host-spawn-1.5.1-1.fc40.src.rpm
Description: Run commands on your host from inside your toolbo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: host-spawn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990223
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dav...@cavalca.na
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990223
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mic...@michel-slm.name
Status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
--- Comment #9 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255654
Pavel Solovev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daron...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
--- Comment #7 from Michel Lind ---
(In reply to blinxen from comment #5)
> I took a small peak at the package and the only issue I found was regarding
> the license field.
> It is missing "0BSD" in the license specification.
> See
> https://d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173758
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2007846
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2007846&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6338636 to 6873418
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173758
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
You are indeed correct. I have updated the license list (same URLs).
I must have missed updating this after updating the package from v0.1.9 to
v0.1.11.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173758
--- Comment #8 from Scott K Logan ---
Upstream has yet to release a new version, so I pulled your patch from the
commit logs.
The package was already building `apriltag_demo` during each build, but I added
an invocation of it to %check as a s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256840
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256840
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2007842
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2007842&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6873341 to 6873373
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6873373
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2246133-remind/fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #18 from Neil Hanlon ---
Spec URL: https://neil.fedorapeople.org/reviews/remind/remind.spec
SRPM URL:
https://neil.fedorapeople.org/reviews/remind/remind-04.02.08-1.fc39.src.rpm
fix build failures
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257092
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h-k...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #5 from blin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2007839
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2007839&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6565170 to 6873341
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6873341
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2246133-remind/fedora-rawhid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246133
--- Comment #15 from Neil Hanlon ---
Spec URL: https://neil.fedorapeople.org/reviews/remind/remind.spec
SRPM URL:
https://neil.fedorapeople.org/reviews/remind/remind-04.02.08-1.fc39.src.rpm
Thanks for the review! I've addressed the comments f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254883
--- Comment #3 from Albert Larsan ---
I do not need 1.3.x, it is just because 1.3.3 was the latest version when I
made the package.
Should I post new SRPM & Specs with the 1.4.x version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257307
Albert Larsan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2254775
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254775
Albert Larsan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2257307
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221418
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Newton ---
also it might be better to convert those patches into sed commands in %prep to
reduce some fragility to updates.
It's pretty straightforward:
sed -i 's|/opt/rocm|%{_prefix}|' Tensile/Common.py
sed -i 's|
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
