https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262825
--- Comment #24 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 11.1.2:
Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/phpunit11.git/plain/phpunit11.spec?id=bc89b076937b71a3f7d6281f95e10e8993cc555d
SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/phpunit1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274950
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274250
--- Comment #6 from Davide Cavalca ---
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/katago/katago.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/katago/katago-1.14.1-1.fc41.src.rpm
Changelog:
- move docs to a -doc subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274250
--- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca ---
> Agreed, afaict it looks for where the binary is, but the code wasn't super
> clear. I'll get an upstream issue filed for this.
Looks like this is by design:
https://github.com/lightvector/KataGo/blob/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274950
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Steffan ---
Okay, I've updated the license and rebuilt. The spec and the src.rpm will match
now.
Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/xrgears.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/xrg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274950
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
The only actual issue remaining is:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274950
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273619
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Err...
> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d
> %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/vdostats
This is the wrong place to install bash completion files. It should be
installed into "%{bash_completions_dir}"
Al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Oh some more spec notes:
> %{_mandir}/man8/vdostats.8.gz
> %{_mandir}/man8/vdodmeventd.8.gz
> %{_mandir}/man8/vdodumpconfig.8.gz
> %{_mandir}/man8/vdoforcerebuild.8.gz
> %{_mandir}/man8/vdoformat.8.gz
> %{_m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Some notes:
> - This is my first Fedora package and as such, I will need a sponsor.
If you haven't got a sponsor yet, let's talk, as I am able to do so.
> - I will be on PTO April 8th through the 19th, del
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275206
Bug ID: 2275206
Summary: Review Request: rust-no-std-net - Rust's std::net...
without the 'std'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254920
--- Comment #5 from Chris Adams ---
Bumped release for spec file cleanups:
Spec URL:
https://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/perl-Net-Async-WebSocket/perl-Net-Async-WebSocket.spec
SRPM URL:
https://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/perl-Net-Async-WebSocket/pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270021
--- Comment #22 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Benson, I really appreciate your review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275196
Bug ID: 2275196
Summary: Review Request:
golang-google-genproto-googleapis-api-serviceusage -
Generated code for Google Cloud client libraries
serviceusage module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275195
Bug ID: 2275195
Summary: Review Request:
golang-google-genproto-googleapis-api-servicemanagemen
t - Generated code for Google Cloud client libraries
servicemanagem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275194
Bug ID: 2275194
Summary: Review Request:
golang-google-genproto-googleapis-api-servicecontrol -
Generated code for Google Cloud client libraries
servicecontrol mod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275193
Bug ID: 2275193
Summary: Review Request:
golang-google-genproto-googleapis-api-apikeys -
Generated code for Google Cloud client libraries
apikeys module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243131
--- Comment #22 from Benson Muite ---
It seems Fedora-review is broken for these as well. Related discussion:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2948
Documentation:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UnownedDirectories/
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274950
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Steffan ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #1)
> - why the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ?
No specific reason, I've just been focused on x86_64. I removed this.
> - why is it built using clang ?
Just have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255715
Tom Rix changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271737
Xavier Delaruelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(benson_muite@emai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535
--- Comment #2 from Bryan Gurney ---
Please disregard the earlier comment; that was a testing error on my part. The
patch in the linked source rpm above works, and builds, and results in a
successful run of fedora-review.
(Interestingly, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268499
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790
--- Comment #10 from Cristian Le ---
Both `yq` should be compatible with each other and compatible with `jq`. No
reason why we can't have both implementations as long as both are prefixed with
`python/go`. Not sure if each one needs to mark th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274720
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790
--- Comment #9 from Dusty Mabe ---
I guess this one won't conflict with the other yq
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467) because this one will be
named `python-yq` at least for the RPM name. Could it be confusing if we have
t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275142
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2220655
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275142
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116405935
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275142
Bug ID: 2275142
Summary: Review Request: rust-typed-builder-macro -
Compile-time type-checked builder derive
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271120
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks! Can you use the URL to upstream license file instead of plain file
name?
Something like this should do it:
"""
# Missing Apache license: https://github.com/danreeves/path-clean/issues/15
Source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272354
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Sorry for the delay.
I just checked, and the patch that was proposed by debian packagers indeed
fixes the test failures.
Can you include it make tests run unconditionally?
Ideally, the license files wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270287
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270287
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271122
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274163
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275096
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116398390
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275096
Bug ID: 2275096
Summary: Review Request: rust-toml-span - Toml parser and
deserializer that preserves span information
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274163
--- Comment #6 from Tomas Tomecek ---
Changed the package to ExclusiveArch to match llama-cpp
(release is not bumped since I'm using %autorelease, but at least build ID is
changing)
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/result
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758472
Aditi Mishra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@linux.ibm.com
--- Comment #31 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270021
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from Be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274163
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Tomecek ---
> No match for argument: python3dist(scikit-build-core[pyproject]) >= 0.5.1
Glad to hear it worked to clean the cache, I struggled with it too.
> I guess this package should not be noarch.
Thanks for br
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271189
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271189
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271189
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-gopkg-telebot3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254920
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok.
Source0 archive (SHA-512
fa9d35f98fced11c7c5f63637d7fc77d52ac5ba44e33dba2df510b470e2c9c440591f537654b9a7e49360ea207c60cae57ea9558460b91ccf4bdba34199d092b)
is original
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254920
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
47 matches
Mail list logo