https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565
--- Comment #8 from Jose Fernandez ---
Fabio, the above spec file is no longer using vendored dependencies.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565
--- Comment #7 from Jose Fernandez ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jfernandez/bpftop/fedora-40-x86_64/07564855-bpftop/bpftop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jfernandez/bpftop/f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275304
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284460
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-67c670c25f has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290391
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283309
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283309
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283309
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the review!
Yes, I'm working on updating snapbox to v0.6 too. I think re-enabling tests
(±bumping v0.5→v0.6) after this is done would be OK. anstyle-svg and snapbox
are released independen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283309
--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2)
> This is reasonable (there are no tests that can run without snapbox, and the
> tests use APIs introduced in snapbox 0.5), but please try to remember to
> re-enable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283309
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290665
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard ---
> The URL field could be https instead of http
Fixed, thanks.
> I don't think you need the rm -rf $RPM_BUILDROOT
I've used the spectemplate that comes with rpmdevtools, it's apparently still
there. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290876
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290876
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290876
Jelle van der Waa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290876
Bug ID: 2290876
Summary: Review Request: cockpit-files - new Fedora package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283517
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290665
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jer...@jcline.org
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283517
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
Oh, I didn't notice. Editing comments is ... weird in bugzilla.
I'll re-run the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|2282977 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282977
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279342
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thank you for the review!
Can't file an unretirement request right now, pagure.io seems to be down ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278709
--- Comment #9 from Fabio Valentini ---
> Test failure is still happening with `mock -r fedora-rawhide-aarch64
> --sources . --spec rust-buddy-alloc.spec --postinstall` - maybe it has
> something to do with being in a VM.
OK, if you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277114
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290871
Kim B. Heino changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262748
--- Comment #5 from Frank Dedden ---
Thanks a lot!
Apparently the package is not building anymore:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118703522, I have noticed
the same with other packages that I am currently working on.
I a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290871
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/FoobarOy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290871
Bug ID: 2290871
Summary: Review Request: foosnapper - Automatic filesystem
snapshooter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254934
--- Comment #9 from Chris Adams ---
Oh yeah, forgot to escape the % when commenting out the original source URL. I
guess that might also break upstream new source monitoring, I'll have to look
at that.
The tests go pretty quickly (a few secon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254934
--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ---
Thanks. All files now have an acceptable license. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
FIX: Escape '%' character in a spec comment at
perl-WWW-Mechanize-Chrome.spec:16.
I'm trying to build the package l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276561
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks!
Petr, do you want to take another look too?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2036695
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2036695&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7434587 to 7553264
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7553264
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279967-openpace/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #7 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Thanks for review, the comments should be fixed. The reported m4 macro is kept
there for some compatibility, as the AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is used only when LT_INIT
is not defined.
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279967
--- Comment #6 from Veronika Hanulíková ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanulik/openpace/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07552883-openpace/openpace.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/vhanu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262825
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7551378
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262825-phpunit11/fedora-raw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262825
--- Comment #26 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 11.2.0:
Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/phpunit11.git/plain/phpunit11.spec?id=15f7cce4525f93bebabd9d25ecb9b3d67427ba55
SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/phpunit1
37 matches
Mail list logo