https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299981
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e18ac26804 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302539
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-32ce982a65 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302931
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-51ab913cd1 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302731
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e37c5498ee has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302932
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-44e39b33b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134899
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2f3c96b9c9 (packetdrill-2.0~20220927gitc556afb-10.el10_0) has
been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Steffan ---
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
This s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303812
Jonathan Steffan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303917
Bug ID: 2303917
Summary: Re-Review Request: erlang-riak_core - Distributed
systems infrastructure used by Riak
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134899
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2f3c96b9c9 (packetdrill-2.0~20220927gitc556afb-10.el10_0) has
been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2f3c96b9c9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260380
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8e6b9a3752 (linux-sysinfo-snapshot-3.7.8.2-1.el10_0) has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260380
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8e6b9a3752 (linux-sysinfo-snapshot-3.7.8.2-1.el10_0) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8e6b9a3752
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=041
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d36c02da03 (mlnx-tools-23.07-5.el10_0) has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=041
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d36c02da03 (mlnx-tools-23.07-5.el10_0) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d36c02da03
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #14 from Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160509
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c4b2008a49 (python-cloudpickle-3.0.0-8.el10_0) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c4b2008a49
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184233
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d1448bd183 (veristat-0.3.2-2.el10_0) has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184233
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d1448bd183 (veristat-0.3.2-2.el10_0) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d1448bd183
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160496
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #8 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160496
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c8c3547361 (python-looseversion-1.3.0-8.el10_0) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c8c3547361
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer ---
Thank you for taking the time to perform this review. Good to know Archlinux
packages wolfssl. I may ping the package maintainer to learn why he chose the
build options he did (since there are so many to ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Jonathan Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Michel Lind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303872
Bug ID: 2303872
Summary: Review Request: python-pkg-depgraph -
Packaging-oriented dependency graph library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #6 from Felix Wang ---
Here are some more comments:
1.
> [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/pkgconfig,
> /usr/src/debug, /usr/include, /usr/include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118835
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9b1ce9a1c9 (clifm-1.19-2.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #5 from Felix Wang ---
Well, using configure script will be also fine.
---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118835
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9b1ce9a1c9 (clifm-1.19-2.el10_0) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9b1ce9a1c9
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #4 from Felix Wang ---
> https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/INSTALL#L80
It seems that that line was written 4 years ago, it may be improved a lot
currently.
The wolfssl package in Arch Linux also uses CMake.
https://g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Bauer ---
Ah right. Good catch. I'll change that to GPL-2.0-or-later based on the project
LICENSING statement:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/LICENSING
I very much prefer cmake, but you may have not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
Felix Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||topa...@outlook.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303666
--- Comment #10 from Michal Schmidt ---
With bug 2302846 now resolved, building osu-micro-benchmarks for F40 works, so
here's the Bodhi update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-036956d5ff
The Guidelines require me to file a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258256
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254133
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-19e0ba9d5a (yyjson-0.10.0-2.el10_0) has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303756
Felix Schwarz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302351
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303756
--- Comment #4 from Felix Schwarz ---
> Looks good although I see one small issue - using %pyupi_source w/o name
> parameter is deprecated.
Ah, I did not know this. Thanks for bringing it up. Will be fixed before I push
the package.
Thank y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303756
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258256
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from F
42 matches
Mail list logo