https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-f8a1bd8e4a (python-stdlibs-2024.5.15-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-f8a1bd8e4a (python-stdlibs-2024.5.15-1.fc41) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f8a1bd8e4a
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
--- Comment #4 from Michel Lind ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305184
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305184
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297417
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-54a6b8bd84 (rust-cargo-vendor-filterer-0.5.14-1.el9) has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-59f421a1df has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-59f421a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305538
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-80a6f5094a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-80a6f50
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305184
--- Comment #9 from Mithun Veluri ---
[X] Used URL for patch
[X] Remove duplicate license file
Publishing the package now. Thank you for your review Sandro!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297417
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-e128c263ea (rust-cargo-vendor-filterer-0.5.14-1.fc39) has been
pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-7212da0e31 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297700
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-783600f7bb has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305930
--- Comment #4 from Cristian Le ---
Ack, fair point. Then instead it should have a `%py_provides`
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305930
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
(In reply to Cristian Le from comment #2)
> - name os the spec file/srpm should be python-btrfs-backup-ng
Not true if this is primarily an application:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305930
Cristian Le changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@lecris.me
--- Comment #2 from Cr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305930
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305930
Bug ID: 2305930
Summary: Review Request: btrfs-backup-ng - Intelligent
incremental backups for btrfs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Lin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122170
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e5e84f443a (easyloggingpp-9.97.1-6.el10_0) has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e5e84f443a
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882
Bug ID: 2305882
Summary: Review Request: papers - View multipage documents
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264719
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Thank you for a thorough review. I hope I addressed all issues now.
> 1) Sources
I tried to use your suggestion, but the make file hard-except git checkout with
submodules. So the tarball from tag does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305258
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249395
--- Comment #7 from Leo Puvilland ---
Updated to 4.1.
Spec URL: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/raw/master/f/86Box.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/86box/srpm-builds/07920923/86Box-4.1-1.src.rpm
Koji Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-59f421a1df (wolfssl-5.7.0-1.el9) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-59f421a1df
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-783600f7bb (wolfssl-5.7.0-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-783600f7bb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305343
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Bauer ---
libimagevisualresult and libimagevisualresult-data are currently uninstallable.
libimagevisualresult-data is noarch but libimagevisualresult is not.
Since the Requires on each package has %{?_isa}, they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297296
--- Comment #4 from Nieves ---
Spec URL: https://nmontero.fedorapeople.org/tinysparql.spec
SRPM URL: https://nmontero.fedorapeople.org/tinysparql-3.7.3-2.fc41.src.rpm
Description: This is a renaming for the package tracker which is being renam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297297
--- Comment #4 from Nieves ---
Spec URL: https://nmontero.fedorapeople.org/localsearch.spec
SRPM URL: https://nmontero.fedorapeople.org/localsearch-3.7.3-1.fc41.src.rpm
Description: This is a renaming for the package tracker-miners which is be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
https://github.com/yav/monadlib/issues/11
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305673
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304967
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-7212da0e31 (wolfssl-5.7.0-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7212da0e31
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
Andrew Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |COMPLETED
Status|RELEASE_PEN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305343
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Bauer ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524
Bryan Gurney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Bauer ---
Fedora Security gave the recommendation to build with AES-NI, which has been
done.
UPDATED Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kni/wolfssl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07920611-wolfssl/w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305342
--- Comment #17 from Davide Cavalca ---
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/fex-emu/fex-emu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/fex-emu/fex-emu-2408-1.fc42.src.rpm
Changelog:
- drop unneeded %post for binfmt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305184
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305342
--- Comment #16 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! Put up https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1385 to get
the guidelines updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305343
Andrew Bauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zonexpertconsulting@outlook
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Bauer ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #11)
> Technically, this would require additional review:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/
> #_new_crypto_libraries
I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189
--- Comment #34 from Michael Catanzaro ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #33)
> Nice, I think the rich requires are a good solution for this! Or at least
> for the rpm build - for the flatpak build, I don't think they are going to
> h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189
--- Comment #33 from Kalev Lember ---
Nice, I think the rich requires are a good solution for this! Or at least for
the rpm build - for the flatpak build, I don't think they are going to help at
all. For firefox flatpak I think the original so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305673
Frank Dedden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305673
--- Comment #1 from Frank Dedden ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=122160341
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305673
Bug ID: 2305673
Summary: Review Request: ghc-what4 - Solver-agnostic symbolic
values support for issuing queries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Co
52 matches
Mail list logo